Accommodate JEDI GeoVals name changes (Oct24) #191
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rtodling
added
bugfix
0 diff structural
mathomp4
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This updates various GeoVals falling the Oct 2024 JEDI variable name change code sprint.
This also includes a fix in setupbend - changes introduced PR #117 broke the old (NCEP) mode of running GPSRO - that is, not using the currently used fix from Ron Errico, Hui Shan and Nikki Prive.
Furthermore, the operationally-named class for OMPS-LP from NPP has been added to gsi.rc.tmpl and gsi_sens.rc.tmpl - eventually I would like to remove the r21c class that's been added to allow running x0050. No x-experiment should be posting to R/M21C input data; it becomes confusing.