Skip to content

Conversation

tjirab
Copy link
Contributor

@tjirab tjirab commented Oct 17, 2025

There's a duplicate document reference in the readme.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Removed the Quickstart: Building a Video AI app example from the Examples section.
    • Standardized formatting in the roadmap sections for improved consistency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Walkthrough

README.md documentation updated to remove the "Quickstart: Building a Video AI app" entry from the Examples section and standardize the "And others." bullet formatting across multiple sections (We'd like to add support for, Open Platform, Roadmap).

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
README.md
Removed "Quickstart: Building a Video AI app" entry from Examples section; standardized "And others." bullet markers from dashes to standard Markdown bullets across multiple sections

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

The quickstart fades, a demo erased—
dashes yield to bullets, neat, retraced.
Documentation breathes its placid sigh,
order settles where the examples die.
Small perfections bloom in README's grace. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "Remove duplicate docs ref" directly relates to the primary change in the changeset—the removal of the "Quickstart: Building a Video AI app" entry from the Examples section of the README. The title clearly conveys the main action and intent, which aligns with the branch name "fix/20251017_readme-dupe" indicating a duplicate removal. While the changeset also includes standardization of formatting for "And others" items, the removal of the duplicate reference appears to be the primary objective. The title is specific enough that a teammate scanning the history would understand the core change without ambiguity.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc032bf and 8e1014a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: unit / Ruff & mypy
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

124-124: Verify the scope of this fix against the PR title.

Line 124 shows a formatting change (* And others), which appears to standardize bullet formatting. However, the PR title "fix: Remove duplicate docs ref" and the AI summary indicate that a "Quickstart: Building a Video AI app" entry was removed from the Examples section. Since removed code is not displayed in the diff, please clarify:

  1. Was the "Quickstart: Building a Video AI app" entry actually a duplicate reference (e.g., appeared in both Examples and Docs sections)?
  2. If so, where exactly did it appear before removal?
  3. Does removing it eliminate all redundancy as intended?

This verification ensures the fix addresses the intended duplication issue.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant