Skip to content

Bump actions/setup-dotnet from 3 to 4 #684

Bump actions/setup-dotnet from 3 to 4

Bump actions/setup-dotnet from 3 to 4 #684

Triggered via push December 7, 2023 04:10
Status Success
Total duration 9m 59s
Artifacts 1
This run and associated checks have been archived and are scheduled for deletion. Learn more about checks retention

dotnet-core.yml

on: push
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

10 warnings
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Query/QuerySyntaxHelperDatabaseTests.cs#L29
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Parameters/ParameterTests.cs#L34
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L33
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L49
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L53
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L60
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L75
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L82
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L115
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)
build: Tests/FAnsiTests/Server/ConnectionStringKeywordAccumulatorTests.cs#L93
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, StringAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2048.md)

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
artifact Expired
123 KB