Skip to content

Conversation

@SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor

@SimonCropp SimonCropp commented Apr 27, 2025

No description provided.

@Hawxy Hawxy merged commit ed44fc3 into JasperFx:master Apr 27, 2025
1 check passed
@SimonCropp SimonCropp deleted the avoid-multiple-calls-to-enumerable.Count-in-ShouldHaveTheSameElementKeysAs branch April 27, 2025 10:21
peggy-quartech pushed a commit to bcgov/PSSG-SPDBT that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
Updated [Alba](git://github.com/JasperFx/alba) from 8.2.0 to 8.2.1.

<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>

_Sourced from [Alba's
releases](git://github.com/JasperFx/alba/releases)._

## 8.2.1

## Bug Fixes

* Remove redundant type constraint T: class on IUrlEpxression.Json
method by @​thuijer in JasperFx/alba#200

## Internal Changes 

* Fix some documentation typos by @​Hawxy in
JasperFx/alba#187
* exclude *.received.* since they are a temp file used by Verify by
@​SimonCropp in JasperFx/alba#188
* Simplify snapshot testing by @​SimonCropp in
JasperFx/alba#189
* add link to Verify.AspNetCore by @​SimonCropp in
JasperFx/alba#190
* use well known header properties by @​SimonCropp in
JasperFx/alba#191
* cleanup HttpRequestBody by @​SimonCropp in
JasperFx/alba#193
* make Snapshot Testing reflect recent verify changes by @​SimonCropp in
JasperFx/alba#192
* avoid redundant stream to array allocation in AssertionContext by
@​SimonCropp in JasperFx/alba#194
* avoid multiple calls to enumerable.Count in
ShouldHaveTheSameElementKeysAs by @​SimonCropp in
JasperFx/alba#195
* avoid duplicate dictionary lookup in NoHeaderValueAssertion by
@​SimonCropp in JasperFx/alba#196

## New Contributors
* @​thuijer made their first contribution in
JasperFx/alba#200

**Full Changelog**:
JasperFx/alba@v8.2.0...v8.2.1

Commits viewable in [compare
view](git://github.com/JasperFx/alba/compare/v8.2.0...v8.2.1).
</details>

[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=Alba&package-manager=nuget&previous-version=8.2.0&new-version=8.2.1)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)


</details>

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants