-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
GroupBy aggregate fix #803
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cd3747f
small QoL improvement to the value/type check of DataColumnImpl
Jolanrensen 3037a97
small fix for two failing tests in #713, where in implodeImpl a tempo…
Jolanrensen 23046d8
small fix for one failing test in #713, where GroupBy.aggregate { thi…
Jolanrensen e4a3af5
Merge branch 'master' into implodeFix
Jolanrensen 1d2c7f9
Merge branch 'refs/heads/implodeFix' into groupByAggregateFix
Jolanrensen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a little bit worried about this expression with 6 ? - what if something goes wrong and will be null, I could not explain myself the logic, should we handle the alternative (or common alternative)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what the
?:
is for at the end. We try to createDataFrame<Type1>
fromAggregateInternalDsl<Type1>
. However, in theory, any KType can be supplied by the user. KTypes likeGroupByReceiverImpl<Type1>
,DataFrame<Type1>
(which would both still work), but unfortunately also KTypes likeCompletelyCustomType
without arguments. So in cases where this type argument cannot be fetched, we default toDataFrame<*>
with the?:
.