-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Add PR description template #566
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
ElectricTariff results documentation corrections [v0.56.3]
4 patches
add note to install gcc via homebrew to the REopt documentation page that explains how to do GHP runs
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Outdated
| - [ ] Any new packages have been added to the [compat] section of Project.toml | ||
| - [ ] REopt version number is updated in Project.toml and CHANGELOG.md if merging into master (do this right before or right after merging) | ||
| - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added. These tests should compare against expected values that are calculated independently of running REopt. Tests should also include garbage collection (see other tests for examples). | ||
| - [ ] Any new REopt outputs have been added to the corresponding Django model in the REopt API |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggest: inputs, outputs, or endpoints
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added "required inputs", but inputs with defaults don't need to be added to the API. It's just the outputs that will cause django errors if they aren't added.
adfarth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hdunham maybe just double check that all of the failed tests are from hitting the rate limit on the PVWatts API. Otherwise, looks good!
Yeah it is that. This PR doesn't change any of the actual REopt code so I'm not worried about tests. |
No description provided.