Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0] [MIG] stock_picking_report_valued_sale_mrp: Migration to 16.0 #356

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aitoreizmendi
Copy link

Standard migration

chienandalu and others added 18 commits December 10, 2024 10:52
We want to consider backordered moves even if they're cancelled but not
cancelled moves from cancelled orders, that must be filtered. Otherwise,
they pullute the amounts computation.
Update/direct assignation should be used instead.
odoo.tools.convert.ParseError: "Element '<xpath expr="//tr[@t-foreach='o.move_line_ids']">' cannot be located in parent view
When the recordset comes from multiple picking we could get a wrong
calculation of the mrp lines in the report when the conditions of same
component for the same order line would apply. So for every picking we
have to compute the kits valuations independently.

TT33076
… in stock.move

It was a related field in v13, but now it's only on the picking, so
let's access to it in the code.

TT50285
@aitoreizmendi aitoreizmendi force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_picking_report_valued_sale_mrp branch 3 times, most recently from 1c14313 to af6cea0 Compare December 10, 2024 10:22
@aitoreizmendi aitoreizmendi force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_picking_report_valued_sale_mrp branch from af6cea0 to bb4053c Compare December 10, 2024 16:43
Copy link
Contributor

@RodrigoBM RodrigoBM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aitoreizmendi aitoreizmendi marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants