Skip to content

Add new LogicalDetectionData message to SensorData #440

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2021

Conversation

pmai
Copy link
Contributor

@pmai pmai commented Nov 5, 2020

LogicalDetectionData provides feature data in the virtual cartesian
sensor coordinate system and is therefore suitable for fusion at the
feature data level, whereas FeatureData is not.

Signed-off-by: Pierre R. Mai [email protected]

This PR coming from the SETLevel4To5 project is partly related to #367, and tackles the issue that the current FeatureData interface is strictly limited to one physical detector/sensor, since the coordinate system is spherical. This makes it more or less impossible to transport fusioned data, which must necessarily reside in one common coordinate system. The naming also tries to align with DIS 23150 (further alignment might also recommend renaming of FeatureData, which is however not included in this PR so as to remain backward compatible for now).

  • My code and comments follow the style guidelines and contributors guidelines of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • New and existing unit tests / travis ci pass locally with my changes.

@pmai pmai added FeatureRequest Proposals which enhance the interface or add additional features. SensorModeling The Group in the ASAM development project working on sensor modeling topics. labels Nov 5, 2020
@pmai pmai added this to the V3.3.0 milestone Nov 5, 2020
@pmai pmai added the ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this MR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. label Nov 25, 2020
@pmai
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmai commented Nov 25, 2020

Since no one chimed in until now, marking it as ready for CCB review. However more involvement from sensor modeling group would probably be good (I've posted this PR by order of the SET Level project, where it comes from the sensor modeling side of things).

@kmeids
Copy link

kmeids commented Dec 9, 2020

Output from CCB meeting - 09.12.2020
Actions:

  1. @kmeids to address it in the next SensorModeling WG meeting and to give feedback to Pierre. (contact persons as well: @PhRosenberger Clemens Linnhoff)
  2. Align with @pmai and add the "Documentation" tag as a next step.

@kmeids kmeids removed the ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this MR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. label Dec 9, 2020
Copy link

@kmeids kmeids left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing major, just some minor linguistic/comments update

@kmeids kmeids assigned pmai and PhRosenberger and unassigned pmai Jan 28, 2021
Copy link

@kmeids kmeids left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing one comment update for sensor_id

@kmeids kmeids added ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this MR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. ReadyToMerge This PR has been approved to merge and will be merged by a member of the CCB. and removed ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this MR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. labels Jan 29, 2021
Copy link

@kmeids kmeids left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved during the CCB meeting 03.02.2021

@kmeids
Copy link

kmeids commented Feb 3, 2021

Results from CCB meeting 03.02.2021
Actions:

  1. @pmai to merge.

@PhRosenberger PhRosenberger force-pushed the feature/logical-detection-data branch from c3f135c to 657aa49 Compare February 3, 2021 10:33
LogicalDetectionData provides feature data in the virtual cartesian
sensor coordinate system and is therefore suitable for fusion at the
feature data level, whereas FeatureData is not.

Signed-off-by: Pierre R. Mai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rosenberger, Philipp <[email protected]>
@pmai pmai force-pushed the feature/logical-detection-data branch from 657aa49 to ed8433b Compare February 3, 2021 13:48
Signed-off-by: Rosenberger, Philipp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pierre R. Mai <[email protected]>
@pmai pmai force-pushed the feature/logical-detection-data branch from ed8433b to c3c1df6 Compare February 3, 2021 13:51
@pmai pmai merged commit 970ce90 into master Feb 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FeatureRequest Proposals which enhance the interface or add additional features. ReadyToMerge This PR has been approved to merge and will be merged by a member of the CCB. SensorModeling The Group in the ASAM development project working on sensor modeling topics.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants