Test: src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts #3192
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive test suite for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 369-369: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 369-369: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (1)
1-390: Overall implementation looks good!The test suite is well-structured with comprehensive coverage of various scenarios. The suggested improvements around type safety and test organization will further enhance the code quality, but the current implementation is solid and ready for review.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 369-369: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 64-64: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 99-99: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
[error] 369-369: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[error] 463-465: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
(lint/complexity/noForEach)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[warning] 463-463: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
[error] 11-11: Formatter would have printed the following content: isAuthenticated: boolean; user?: { id: string; role: string; };
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (3)
1-7: Imports look well-structured.All essential dependencies are clearly declared, and the use of type imports from Fastify, Mercurius, and local modules aligns with best practices.
10-44: Good approach to mocking the context.Your
CurrentClientandTestContextinterfaces, along with thedrizzleClientmock, create a well-organized test environment. They effectively capture the fields needed for testing without polluting the global namespace.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] 11-11: Formatter would have printed the following content: isAuthenticated: boolean; user?: { id: string; role: string; };
183-378: Impressive test coverage and organization.Your nested
describeblocks for “Authentication,” “Authorization,” and “Error Handling” thoroughly validate critical scenarios. This well-structured approach makes it easy to locate specific tests. Keep it up!
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[error] 3-10: Some named imports are only used as types.
This import is only used as a type.
Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the compilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Add inline type keywords.
(lint/style/useImportType)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[warning] 3-3: Some named imports are only used as types.
[error] 3-3: Formatter would have printed the following content: Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the compilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (2)
58-98: LGTM! Well-structured helper functions.The helper functions
createMockUserandcreateMockContextare well-implemented, improving code reusability and maintainability.
175-459: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suites are well-organized and cover all critical scenarios:
- Authentication checks
- Authorization rules
- Error handling
- Edge cases including concurrent access
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3192 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 41.34% 41.34%
=================================================
Files 455 455
Lines 33647 33647
Branches 515 515
=================================================
Hits 13911 13911
Misses 19736 19736 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (3)
90-168: Refine the return type of the resolver.Using
typeof Useras the return type is confusing in TypeScript, especially ifUseris an interface rather than a constructor. Matching the function’s actual return withPromise<User | null>is clearer.-export const resolveCreator = async ( - ... -): Promise<typeof User | null> => { +export const resolveCreator = async ( + ... +): Promise<User | null> => { ... - return existingUser as unknown as typeof User; + return existingUser as User; }
152-153: Improve type safety in database operations.Explicitly typing the
wherecallback’s parameters avoidsany-like behavior and improves clarity. This change also aligns with a previous internal recommendation.-where: (userFields) => eq(userFields.id, parent.creatorId || ""), +where: ( + userFields: { id: string }, + { eq }: { eq: (field: string, value: string) => boolean } +) => eq(userFields.id, parent.creatorId || ""),
170-341: Tests are well-structured and comprehensive!Your test organization, descriptive
itblocks, and coverage of authentication, authorization, and edge cases effectively validate the resolver’s behavior. No issues found here.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (1)
90-94: Return a more direct user type instead oftypeof User.
Usingtypeof Usercan be confusing. ReturningPromise<User | null>orPromise<UserWithMemberships | null>is clearer and more idiomatic:-): Promise<typeof User | null> => { +): Promise<User | null> => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const resolveCreator = async ( parent: OrganizationParent, _args: Record<string, never>, ctx: ResolverContext, ): Promise<User | null> => { // Function implementation... }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[error] 41-41: Interface 'UserWithMemberships' incorrectly extends interface. Types of property 'role' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '"administrator" | "regular"'.
[error] 115-115: Type '(membershipFields: { organizationId: string; }, { eq }: { eq: (a: string, b: string) => boolean; }) => boolean' is not assignable to type 'SQL | ((fields: { createdAt: PgColumn<...>; ...}, operators: { ... }) ...'. Types of parameters 'membershipFields' and 'fields' are incompatible.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (5)
1-40: No significant issues identified.
These initial imports and basic type definitions appear consistent and aligned with standard project patterns.
49-55: Add an explicit return type tocreateMockUser.
This mirrors a past review comment advising more robust type inference.
57-88: No major concerns noted.
Your context creation function appears well-structured and ready for testing.
120-168: No additional issues found in the resolver logic.
The error handling, user role checks, and final return appear consistent with the intended functionality.
170-340: Test blocks look thorough.
The coverage of authentication, authorization, error handling, and edge cases is well-structured.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[warning] 12-12: Formatter would have printed the following content: isAuthenticated: boolean; should be formatted correctly.
[warning] 20-20: Formatter would have printed the following content: currentClient: CurrentClient; should be formatted correctly.
[warning] 37-37: Formatter would have printed the following content: id: string; should be formatted correctly.
[warning] 42-42: Formatter would have printed the following content: role: 'administrator' | 'regular' | 'member'; should be formatted correctly.
[warning] 49-49: Formatter would have printed the following content: role: 'administrator' | 'regular' | 'member'; should be formatted correctly.
[warning] 61-61: Formatter would have printed the following content: currentClient: { isAuthenticated: true, user: { id: 'user-123', role: 'member' } }; should be formatted correctly.
[error] 93-93: Some errors were emitted while running checks. Found 1 error.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (3)
49-91: LGTM! Well-structured helper functions.The helper functions are well-implemented with proper type safety and comprehensive mock objects.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 49-49: Formatter would have printed the following content: role: 'administrator' | 'regular' | 'member'; should be formatted correctly.
[warning] 61-61: Formatter would have printed the following content: currentClient: { isAuthenticated: true, user: { id: 'user-123', role: 'member' } }; should be formatted correctly.
172-342: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suites are well-organized and cover all important scenarios including:
- Authentication checks
- Authorization rules
- Error handling
- Edge cases
11-17: Fix formatting issues in interface definitions.The pipeline reports formatting issues in the interface definitions. Run the formatter to fix the spacing and semicolon placement.
Also applies to: 19-34, 36-47
❌ Verification inconclusive
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Run the project's formatter npm run formatLength of output: 239
Action Required: Resolve Formatting Issues in Interface Definitions
The output indicates that there’s no formatting script available in the project (i.e. the "npm run format" command is missing from package.json). This means the automated formatting check cannot be applied as described. Please consider one of the following actions:
- Add a formatting script (for instance, using Prettier) to the project's package.json. For example:
"format": "prettier --write ."- Or, manually apply the required formatting fixes (spacing, semicolon placements, etc.) to the interface definitions (specifically at lines 11–17, 19–34, and 36–47).
These steps ensure that the formatting issues noted by the pipeline are addressed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 12-12: Formatter would have printed the following content: isAuthenticated: boolean; should be formatted correctly.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (4)
1-7: Useimport typefor type-only imports.For better type safety and bundle optimization, use
import typefor imports that are only used as types.-import type { FastifyInstance, FastifyReply } from "fastify"; -import type { MercuriusContext } from "mercurius"; -import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; -import type { GraphQLContext } from "../../../../src/graphql/context"; -import type { User } from "../../../../src/graphql/types/User/User"; -import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "../../../../src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError"; +import type { FastifyInstance, FastifyReply } from "fastify"; +import type { MercuriusContext } from "mercurius"; +import type { MockedFunction } from "vitest"; +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; +import type { GraphQLContext } from "../../../../src/graphql/context"; +import type { User } from "../../../../src/graphql/types/User/User"; +import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "../../../../src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError";
108-112: Enhance error messages for better debugging.Add descriptive messages to error objects to improve the debugging experience.
throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", + message: "User must be authenticated to access organization creator information", }, }); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", + message: "Current user not found in the database", }, }); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthorized_action", + message: "User must be a system or organization administrator to access creator information", }, }); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unexpected", + message: `Creator with ID ${parent.creatorId} not found for organization ${parent.id}`, }, });Also applies to: 136-140, 151-155, 171-175
178-178: Improve type casting safety in resolver return.The type casting
as unknown as typeof Usercould be simplified.- return existingUser as unknown as typeof User; + return existingUser as User;
181-351: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite effectively covers:
- Authentication scenarios
- Authorization rules
- Error handling
- Edge cases
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@palisadoes The check_type_errors step is failing in the pipeline, but it runs fine on my local system. Do you have any insights on what might be causing this difference?" |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
The errors are self explanatory |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (6)
1-8: All imports look well-structured with type-only usage.You're correctly importing types separately and avoiding unnecessary runtime imports. Good adherence to best practices here!
11-17: Unify user role type with your strict union.Currently,
user?: { role: string }doesn’t align with your"administrator" | "regular" | "member"union used elsewhere. For consistent type safety, unify these definitions.
36-39: OrganizationParent interface looks consistent.This straightforward approach for
idandcreatorIdaids clarity in distinguishing organizations with and without creators.
52-63: Explicit return type is well-defined.Your
createMockUserfunction is correctly typed, which helps maintain clarity in tests. Good job!
138-145: Validate membership usage.You only check the first entry of
organizationMembershipsWhereMember. If multiple memberships exist for the same org, consider filtering them by organization ID or verifying them all to ensure the correct role is used.
176-346: Comprehensive test coverage.The suite covers authentication, authorization, error handling, and edge cases effectively. Great approach!
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (4)
1-6: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Optimize imports using
import type.For better type safety and bundle optimization, use
import typefor type-only imports.-import type { FastifyInstance, FastifyReply } from "fastify"; -import type { MercuriusContext } from "mercurius"; -import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; -import type { GraphQLContext } from "../../../../src/graphql/context"; +import { eq } from "drizzle-orm"; +import type { FastifyInstance, FastifyReply } from "fastify"; +import type { MercuriusContext } from "mercurius"; +import type { GraphQLContext } from "../../../../src/graphql/context"; +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; +import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "../../../../src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError";
180-185: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Improve type casting safety in mock context.
Replace unsafe type casting with
satisfiesoperator for better type safety.- } as unknown as FastifyInstance, + } satisfies Partial<FastifyInstance>, reply: { code: vi.fn(), send: vi.fn(), header: vi.fn(), - } as unknown as FastifyReply, + } satisfies Partial<FastifyReply>,
196-200: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Enhance error messages for better debugging.
Add descriptive messages to error objects to improve debugging experience.
throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", + message: "User must be authenticated to access organization creator information", }, }); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", + message: "Current user not found in the database", }, }); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthorized_action", + message: "User must be a system or organization administrator to access creator information", }, }); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unexpected", + message: `Creator with ID ${parent.creatorId} not found for organization ${parent.id}`, }, });Also applies to: 224-228, 239-243, 259-263
407-408: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider renaming the nested "Edge Cases" suite.
There is already a higher-level "Edge Cases" describe block. Using the same name again might lead to confusion when reading test results.
-describe("Edge Cases", () => { +describe("Additional Edge Cases", () => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
drizzle_migrations/meta/_journal.json(1 hunks)test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
drizzle_migrations/meta/_journal.json (1)
1-13: LGTM!The changes only involve whitespace formatting and don't affect functionality.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@palisadoes My test file issue is resolved, but I accidentally committed two unnecessary files. I have deleted them now, but sensitive files still appear in the workflow and test failed because of i deleted the files can make a new PR with fresh? |
|
@palisadoes Please Close this PR. I'm creating a new one from scratch. Sorry for the inconvenience. |
|
You can close your own PRs |
Okay thanks |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Test Implementation and Code Quality Enhancement
Issue Number:
Fixes #3071
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No documentation update required as this is a test implementation.
Summary
Implementation of unit tests for the organization creator field resolver
Coverage of authentication and authorization scenarios
Testing of edge cases and error handling
Proper typing of test context objects to improve code quality
Implementation of mocking strategies for database interactions
These tests ensure the robust functionality of the venue creator resolver while maintaining high code quality standards.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the [contributing guide](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Let me know if you need any modifications! 🚀
Summary by CodeRabbit