Skip to content

Conversation

@zhenfeizhang
Copy link
Contributor

@zhenfeizhang zhenfeizhang commented Jul 29, 2025

  • remove Orion/Hyrax/BiKZG
  • remove Mersenne31
  • add whir for babybear/goldilocks
  • unify sumcheck kernals (maybe)

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @zhenfeizhang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a significant codebase reduction by systematically removing several Polynomial Commitment Schemes and their underlying infrastructure. The changes aim to streamline the project by eliminating unused components and simplifying existing ones, while also updating the system to support future PCS additions.

Highlights

  • Polynomial Commitment Scheme (PCS) Cleanup: I have completely removed the Orion and Hyrax Polynomial Commitment Schemes from the codebase, including their implementations, configurations, and all associated tests. This significantly reduces the overall code footprint.
  • KZG Scheme Simplification: The BiKZG (Bivariate KZG) scheme has been replaced with UniKZG (Univariate KZG). This involved deleting all BiKZG-specific code and streamlining the UniKZG implementation by removing now-unused structures like HyperKZGAggregatedEvals.
  • Dependency Pruning: The tree crate, along with its entire directory, has been removed as it is no longer a dependency. Additionally, gf2, serdes_derive, and config_macros have been pruned from the workspace and relevant files where their functionality is no longer needed.
  • PCS Type Evolution: The PolynomialCommitmentType enum has been updated to reflect the removal of deprecated PCS types (Hyrax, Orion, FRI) and to introduce WHIR, paving the way for future PCS integrations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to reduce the codebase size by removing several cryptographic schemes, including Orion, Hyrax, and BiKZG. The changes primarily consist of deleting files and code related to these schemes, which is consistent with the PR's goal. My review has identified one critical issue in the root Cargo.toml where the config_macros crate is removed from the workspace members, which will likely break the build as it is still in use. This needs to be addressed to ensure the project compiles successfully.

"arith/polynomials",
"bin", # binary executables
"circuit",
"config_macros", # proc macros used to declare a new config, this has to a separate crate due to rust compilation issues
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The config_macros crate is removed from the workspace members, but it appears to be still in use in other parts of the codebase (e.g., in gkr/src/gkr_configs.rs). This will likely cause the build to fail because path dependencies to non-workspace members are not resolved correctly. Please consider re-adding config_macros to the workspace members.

A similar issue might exist for serdes_derive (removed on line 18) if it's still in use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants