You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
even though the difference is only 0.05 Å - this is not ideal in terms of simulations via PPSTM_simple.py, or the GUI.py, where we are using geometry.in directly within the FHI-aims reading procedure. The shift in the cube file causes shift of the internal coordinates in the PP-AFM precalculations.
Current solution:
The only way around is to use the latest version of PP-AFM and mv geometry.in geometry-aims.in and use ASE to get new geometry.in from any of the xsf files, that PP-AFM produces.
We should find a better (and more automatized) way around it!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could add a way into PPSTM_simple.py and GUI to upload the geometry from npy or xsf files directly in the FHI-aims reading procedure. There also should be some "error proof" check on the way somewhere as on can make a mistake easily.
Problem:
if in FHI-aims control.in one is having:
the cube starting vector is not (0,0,0):
e.g.:
even though the difference is only 0.05 Å - this is not ideal in terms of simulations via PPSTM_simple.py, or the GUI.py, where we are using geometry.in directly within the FHI-aims reading procedure. The shift in the cube file causes shift of the internal coordinates in the PP-AFM precalculations.
Current solution:
The only way around is to use the latest version of PP-AFM and
mv geometry.in geometry-aims.in
and use ASE to get new geometry.in from any of the xsf files, that PP-AFM produces.We should find a better (and more automatized) way around it!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: