Skip to content

Conversation

@DennisOSRM
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

This PR seems to be stale. Is it still relevant?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 9, 2025
@TheMarex
Copy link
Member

TheMarex commented Jan 9, 2026

Have you benchmarked this? If I remember correctly the (technically) incorrect initialization actually yields better result for the particular use-case because there is such a high spatial correlation between node IDs in the graph that it is close to sequential. The MSB part will be basically fixed and most of the entropy comes from the LSB part. With random initialization the LSB part will have duplicates, so we are creating more collisions with the same amount of bits.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Jan 10, 2026
@DennisOSRM
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Have you benchmarked this? If I remember correctly the (technically) incorrect initialization actually yields better result for the particular use-case because there is such a high spatial correlation between node IDs in the graph that it is close to sequential. The MSB part will be basically fixed and most of the entropy comes from the LSB part. With random initialization the LSB part will have duplicates, so we are creating more collisions with the same amount of bits.

Now that you mention that, it rings a bell. Let me dig into my files if I can rediscover the benchmarks from way back when.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants