feat(rocBLAS): add FFM test sets

[TorreZuk]

Motivation

This pull request introduces new FFM test categories and integrates them into the test configuration for both hipBLAS and rocBLAS projects. The main goal is to support FFM pipelines, with specific timeouts and test patterns, as well as to update the XML test runner configuration. The most important changes are summarized below.

Test category additions and configuration:

• Added new ffm-quick and ffm-full test categories to both hipblas and rocblas test_categories.yaml files, including descriptions, test patterns, exclusions, and labels for each category. These are intended for FFM runs.

• Set category-specific timeouts for ffm-quick and ffm-full (2 hours each) in the execution_settings sections of both projects to enforce FFM runner time budgets.

rocBLAS test runner and category updates:

• Updated rocblas test categories to indicate that the rtest-driver is enabled, which means test patterns and exclusions are not used for most categories. Also added *known_bug* as a placeholder pattern and exclusion for consistency.

Test runner integration:

• Updated rocblas/rtest.xml to define new test sets for ctest_ffm-quick and ctest_ffm-full, specifying the corresponding YAML files and filters to be used during the test runs.

JIRA ID: AIROCBLAS-1269

[TorreZuk]

@JeniferC99 this closely matches your PR for hipblas, still not clear if runner for hipblas is desired but test sets can added as if ignored are fine. rocblas now uses rtest-driver so xml file driven runs

[therock-pr-bot]

❌ PR Check — Action Required

Check	Status	Details
🌿 Branch Name	✅ Pass	—
📝 PR Title/Description	❌ Fail	Error: Title does not follow Conventional Commits style. Expected: start with a valid type (feat, fix, docs, …). Desired format: type(optional-scope): short description
⛔ Forbidden Files	✅ Pass	—
🧪 Unit Test	✅ Pass	PR does not contain code files — Unit Test auto-passed
🔎 pre-commit	✅ Pass	—
🚫 Draft PR	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
🚩 Feature Flag	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
📊 Code Coverage	🔜 To Be Enabled	—

⚠️ 1 policy check(s) failed. Please address the issues above before this PR can be Reviewed.

🚫 Please fix the failed policies

• ❌ PR Title/Description

The Not ready to Review label was added to this PR. Once all policies pass, the label is removed automatically.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

[therock-pr-bot]

🚫 Please fix the failed policies before requesting reviews.

The following policy checks failed:

• ❌ PR Title/Description

The Not ready to Review label has been added to this PR.
Once all policies pass, the label will be removed automatically.

[evedovelli]

LGTM

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (76.84%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #9376      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    64.69%   64.68%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         2685     2685              
  Lines       422637   422637              
  Branches     62808    62808              
===========================================
- Hits        273416   273376      -40     
- Misses      128551   128593      +42     
+ Partials     20670    20668       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
TensileLite	35.05% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
hipBLAS	90.62% <ø> (-0.19%)	⬇️
hipBLASLt	34.69% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
hipCUB	82.68% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
hipDNN	86.03% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
hipFFT	50.88% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
hipRAND	76.12% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
hipSOLVER	69.18% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
hipSPARSE	86.10% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
rocBLAS	47.92% <ø> (ø)
rocFFT	46.82% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
rocRAND	57.03% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
rocSOLVER	76.84% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
rocSPARSE	72.37% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a
rocThrust	91.36% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 13d842a

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[TorreZuk]

@JeniferC99 can you review, and what is your co_author string for me to add on merge?
I thought I asked github to add a dropdown feature for this but can't find it.