Revert "feat: [rocBLAS] expand supported ctest options"

[amd-chiranjeevi]

Reverts #8984

[therock-pr-bot]

❌ PR Check — Action Required

Check	Status	Details
🌿 Branch Name	✅ Pass	—
📝 PR Title/Description	❌ Fail	Error: Title does not follow Conventional Commits style. Expected: start with a valid type (feat, fix, docs, …). Desired format: type(optional-scope): short description ─── Error: PR description must reference a JIRA ID, ISSUE ID, or a GitHub closing keyword. Expected: include a JIRA ID / ISSUE ID line (separator : or -, or omitted; value may be a JIRA key, a number with/without #, or a link), OR a closing keyword + issue reference. Accepted examples: • JIRA ID : TESTAUTO-6039 • JIRA ID - #330 • JIRA ID #330 • ISSUE ID : TESTUTO-3334 • ISSUE ID #3334 • ISSUE ID - TESTAUTO-3433 • ISSUE ID : https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/1234 • Closes #10 • Fixes octo-org/octo-repo#100 • Resolves: #123 • #123 • https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/123 Current: no valid JIRA/ISSUE/closing-keyword reference found
⛔ Forbidden Files	✅ Pass	—
🧪 Unit Test	✅ Pass	—
🔎 pre-commit	✅ Pass	—
🚫 Draft PR	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
🚩 Feature Flag	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
📊 Code Coverage	🔜 To Be Enabled	—

⚠️ 1 policy check(s) failed. Please address the issues above before this PR can be Reviewed.

🚫 Please fix the failed policies

• ❌ PR Title/Description

The Not ready to Review label was added to this PR. Once all policies pass, the label is removed automatically.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

[therock-pr-bot]

🚫 Please fix the failed policies before requesting reviews.

The following policy checks failed:

• ❌ PR Title/Description

The Not ready to Review label has been added to this PR.
Once all policies pass, the label will be removed automatically.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (76.84%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #9394   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    64.60%   64.60%           
========================================
  Files         2687     2687           
  Lines       423266   423266           
  Branches     62933    62933           
========================================
  Hits        273438   273438           
  Misses      129156   129156           
  Partials     20672    20672           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
TensileLite	34.72% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipBLAS	90.81% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipBLASLt	34.69% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipCUB	82.68% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipDNN	86.03% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipFFT	50.88% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipRAND	76.12% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipSOLVER	69.18% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
hipSPARSE	86.10% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
rocBLAS	47.92% <ø> (ø)
rocFFT	46.82% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
rocRAND	57.03% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
rocSOLVER	76.84% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
rocSPARSE	72.37% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25
rocThrust	91.36% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 7f54a25

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.