feat: Add Advanced Filtering Options to Invoice Dashboard and Improve Balance Check #270
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces comprehensive improvements to the invoice dashboard's filtering and payment processing capabilities. The changes span multiple components, including Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
shared/components/dropdown.svelte (2)
5-9: Consider making the CheckIcon color configurable.The SVG icon's stroke color is hardcoded to white, which might not work well with different background colors or themes.
- <path d="M11.6666 3.5L5.24992 9.91667L2.33325 7" stroke="white" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"/> + <path d="M11.6666 3.5L5.24992 9.91667L2.33325 7" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"/>
186-192: Enhance touch targets for mobile devices.The current padding might be too small for comfortable touch interaction on mobile devices. Consider increasing the padding for better mobile usability.
.dropdown-item { display: flex; align-items: center; - padding: 4px 8px; + padding: 8px 12px; cursor: pointer; transition: background-color 0.2s; justify-content: space-between; }shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (1)
30-40: Good approach to toggling the checked state of each option.
This approach directly maps over the options array, promoting immutability. However, consider whether using a dedicated store or industrial state-management library might further optimize performance for large option lists.packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (1)
184-209: Fetching requests and populating network options.
This code block systematically builds thenetworkOptionsarray from the unique networks in the fetched requests. As a future enhancement, consider lazy-fetching if the list becomes large.shared/components/input.svelte (1)
125-127: Positioning of input-icon using absolute coordinates.
Works fine for typical designs. Consider media queries if you foresee smaller screens needing different alignment.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte(2 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte(9 hunks)shared/components/dropdown.svelte(8 hunks)shared/components/input.svelte(3 hunks)shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (3)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:236-247
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T04:03:25.560Z
Learning: In the `checkApproval` function of `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte` (TypeScript/Svelte code), remember that the `ETH_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT` payment network ID does not require approval because Ether payments do not need ERC20 approvals.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, mapping payment network IDs to their respective approval functions in the `checkApproval` function is acceptable and can improve readability and maintainability.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, prefer using `if`/`else if` structures over mapping in the `checkApproval` function for better readability.
🔇 Additional comments (20)
shared/components/dropdown.svelte (1)
Line range hint 13-17: Verify integration with all filter types.
The component needs to support Type (IN/OUT), Status, and Chain filters as mentioned in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
The previous commands failed because of file type issues. Let's try a broader search to find relevant files and their contents.
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as there's sufficient evidence to verify the dropdown component's integration with all required filter types.
The dropdown component fully supports all required filter types.
The implementation shows proper integration with:
- Type filters (IN/OUT) in
view-requests.sveltewithtxTypeOptions - Status filters in
view-requests.sveltewithstatusOptionsandtype="status" - Chain/Network filters with
type="network"in the searchable dropdown component
The component is being used correctly in the Invoice Dashboard with all the necessary filter types mentioned in the PR objectives.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the dropdown component usage with all required filter types
# Search for dropdown usage with different filter types
rg -A 5 "dropdown.*type.*status|chain" --type svelte
# Search for filter type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type: "checkbox"'
Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for dropdown component usage in all files
rg -l "dropdown"
# Then search for specific filter types usage
rg -A 5 "type.*status|chain|IN|OUT"
# Search for files containing both dropdown and filter references
rg -l "dropdown.*filter|filter.*dropdown"
Length of output: 44035
shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (4)
8-14: Exported props look well-defined.
The props (config, options, onchange, etc.) are clearly typed, improving readability and maintainability.
51-56: Slot usage for the icon is clean and consistent.
Allowing the user to conditionally pass an icon is a good design pattern.
98-109: Network/transaction/status sub-components are well-delineated.
The logic that dynamically renders a NetworkIcon, TxType, or StatusLabel is clear and maintainable. This modular approach helps keep the component flexible.
208-222: Checkbox styling approach is well-structured.
The custom styling for checked vs. unchecked states, along with a dynamic CheckIcon, looks polished. Great job using CSS classes for toggling states.
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (8)
20-20: Import of SearchableDropdownCheckbox appears correct.
No issues identified.
110-117: Initialization of filter states.
Defining arrays for selected networks, status, and transaction types is appropriate. This provides a clear foundation for multi-filtering.
418-418: Search input line reset.
Resetting the currentPage to 1 whenever the search input changes is a good UX decision, ensuring that updated results start from the first page.
455-486: Ensuring persistent filter states on data reload.
Restoring the selectedNetworks after reloading is user-friendly. Great job preserving user context.
493-504: handleNetworkSelection.
The logic that reloads requests when filters are emptied ensures consistent behavior. The loading state management is also nicely implemented.
506-514: TxType/Status selection.
Straightforward approach to assigning new filter arrays, followed by resetting pagination. This is consistent with the network selection pattern.
558-567: Search input integration.
Using an Input component with an icon slot for the search icon is a well-structured approach. This provides a clean UI.
578-610: Dropdown controls for advanced filtering.
The arrangement of three SearchableDropdownCheckbox components for status, transaction type, and chain is logical. Handling the columns with a separate Dropdown helps maintain a consistent UI. Good job.
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (2)
375-446: Robust checkApproval function.
Great job validating the presence of addresses, signers, network alignment, and payment requirements. The fallback returns (false) are carefully handled for unsupported or invalid scenarios.
542-609: Improved checkBalance function.
Your multi-step checks (correct network, token presence, etc.) are thorough. The usage of getBalance from wagmi ensures reliable fetch. Logging partial failures is beneficial for debugging.
shared/components/input.svelte (5)
39-49: Checkbox block structure.
Nicely labeled and uses Svelte's two-way binding for checked. The approach is concise.
51-69: Conditional icon slot is usefully placed.
The wrapper .text-input-wrapper with optional icon slot styling is a neat approach, clarifying which UI elements are visible.
118-121: text-input-wrapper styling block
The dedicated class for positioning is a good practice. It simplifies potential future layout modifications.
151-152: Padding for .text-input.has-icon
This anticipates the space needed for the icon, preventing overlap. Looks good.
155-157: Using accent-color in checkbox-input
This ensures a consistent color scheme in modern browsers. Good choice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
shared/components/dropdown.svelte (1)
5-9: Consider making the CheckIcon stroke color configurableThe SVG icon uses a hardcoded white stroke color which might not be suitable for all background colors. Consider making it configurable through CSS variables.
- <path d="M11.6666 3.5L5.24992 9.91667L2.33325 7" stroke="white" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"/> + <path d="M11.6666 3.5L5.24992 9.91667L2.33325 7" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"/>shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (4)
8-14: Add TypeScript type safety for propsThe props are typed but could benefit from stricter type definitions.
Consider creating an enum for the
typeprop and a proper interface for the options:export enum DropdownType { Network = "network", Transaction = "transaction", Status = "status" } export interface DropdownOption { value: string; checked?: boolean; } export let type: DropdownType = DropdownType.Network; export let options: DropdownOption[] = [];
27-29: Optimize search implementationThe current search implementation re-filters on every render.
Consider debouncing the search to improve performance:
import { debounce } from 'lodash-es'; let debouncedSearch = debounce((term: string) => { filteredOptions = options.filter((option) => option.value.toLowerCase().includes(term.toLowerCase()) ); }, 300); $: searchTerm && debouncedSearch(searchTerm);
216-227: Improve dropdown menu positioning and responsivenessThe current positioning might cause issues on mobile devices or when near viewport edges.
Consider adding these improvements:
.dropdown-menu { z-index: 1200; position: absolute; width: fit-content; min-width: 100%; top: 55px; background-color: white; border-radius: 8px; + max-width: calc(100vw - 2rem); + @media (max-width: 640px) { + position: fixed; + left: 1rem; + right: 1rem; + width: auto; + } box-shadow: 0 1px 3px 0 rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1), 0 1px 2px -1px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1); }
172-179: Review z-index managementThe z-index values (200 for overlay, 1200 for dropdown) seem arbitrary and could conflict with other components.
Consider implementing a z-index management system:
- Create a shared constants file with z-index values
- Document the z-index hierarchy
- Use lower values if possible (e.g., 1-10 range)
Example constants file:
export const Z_INDEX = { overlay: 5, dropdown: 6, // ... other values } as const;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
shared/components/dropdown.svelte(9 hunks)shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
shared/components/dropdown.svelte (6)
41-76: Well-implemented keyboard navigation!
The keyboard navigation implementation follows accessibility best practices with proper event handling and focus management.
117-124: Good accessibility implementation on the dropdown button
The button implementation includes all necessary ARIA attributes and proper keyboard event handling.
141-154: Add missing keyboard interaction support for checkbox items
The checkbox items still need proper keyboard interaction support for accessibility.
<li
class="dropdown-item"
class:selected={option.checked}
class:focused={index === focusedIndex}
on:click={() => selectOption(option.value, option.checked)}
role="option"
aria-selected={option.checked}
- tabindex="-1"
+ tabindex="0"
+ on:keydown={(e) => {
+ if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') {
+ e.preventDefault();
+ selectOption(option.value, option.checked);
+ }
+ }}
>Line range hint 219-236: Good responsive design implementation
The dropdown menu styling handles varying content lengths well with appropriate max-width and scrolling behavior.
252-264: Add focus styles for keyboard navigation
The custom checkbox still needs focus styles for better keyboard navigation visibility.
+.dropdown-item:focus-visible {
+ outline: 2px solid var(--mainColor);
+ outline-offset: -2px;
+ border-radius: 4px;
+}267-273: Good focus state implementation
The focus state styling provides clear visual feedback while maintaining consistency with hover states.
|
Inconsistent placeholder text: "Filter by Status" vs "Type" Instead of "Filter By", can you add a Filter icon for all three filters? |
|
Does the Type filter appear only on the All tab? Or does it appear on the Pay and Get Paid tabs too? The Type filter must not conflict with the Pay and Get Paid tabs. How we achieve this is debatable. Before I suggest possible solutions I want to know if you've already thought of this and resolved it in some way. |
The only problem is with the Transaction Type, even that is not a problem because when you go to Pay, and filter by IN transactions, it will not show anything, because you are in the Pay tab |
EDIT: Let's fix (1) in this PR. I'll make a new issue for (2) so we can fix it later - given the time constraints of wanting to deploy to Production today. EDIT2: Issue to fix (2) created ✅ #272 |
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…183-request-invoicing-improve-filtering-on-invoice-dashboard
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (1)
386-388: Use console.info for informational messages.Since this is an informational message about a valid state, use
console.infoinstead ofconsole.log.- console.log("Payment already completed, skipping approval check"); + console.info("Payment already completed, skipping approval check");packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (3)
502-523: Consider consolidating filter handlersWhile the current implementation is correct, consider consolidating the three similar handlers into a single generic handler to reduce code duplication.
-const handleNetworkSelection = async (networks: string[]) => { - selectedNetworks = networks; - currentPage = 1; - if (networks.length === 0 && selectedNetworks.length > 0) { - loading = true; - try { - await getRequests(account!, requestNetwork!); - } finally { - loading = false; - } - } -}; - -const handleTxTypeSelection = (types: string[]) => { - selectedTxTypes = types; - currentPage = 1; -}; - -const handleStatusSelection = (statuses: string[]) => { - selectedStatuses = statuses; - currentPage = 1; -}; +type FilterType = 'network' | 'txType' | 'status'; + +const handleFilterSelection = async (values: string[], type: FilterType) => { + const filterMap = { + network: selectedNetworks, + txType: selectedTxTypes, + status: selectedStatuses + }; + + filterMap[type] = values; + currentPage = 1; + + if (type === 'network' && values.length === 0 && selectedNetworks.length > 0) { + loading = true; + try { + await getRequests(account!, requestNetwork!); + } finally { + loading = false; + } + } +};
567-619: LGTM: Filter UI implementation matches requirementsThe implementation of the filter UI components is clean and consistent. However, as noted in the PR comments, consider making the placeholder text consistent across all filters.
- placeholder="Filter by Status" + placeholder="Status"
272-294: Consider extracting filter predicates for better readabilityWhile the filtering logic is correct, consider extracting the filter predicates into separate functions for better readability and maintainability.
-$: filteredRequests = requests?.filter((request) => { - const terms = searchQuery.toLowerCase(); - const network = request.currencyInfo.network; - const txType = signer === request.payer?.value ? "OUT" : "IN"; - const status = checkStatus(request).toLowerCase(); - - const networkMatch = - selectedNetworks.length === 0 || - (network && selectedNetworks.includes(network)); - - const txTypeMatch = - selectedTxTypes.length === 0 || selectedTxTypes.includes(txType); - - const statusMatch = - selectedStatuses.length === 0 || selectedStatuses.includes(status); +const matchesNetwork = (request: Types.IRequestDataWithEvents) => { + const network = request.currencyInfo.network; + return selectedNetworks.length === 0 || (network && selectedNetworks.includes(network)); +}; + +const matchesTxType = (request: Types.IRequestDataWithEvents) => { + const txType = signer === request.payer?.value ? "OUT" : "IN"; + return selectedTxTypes.length === 0 || selectedTxTypes.includes(txType); +}; + +const matchesStatus = (request: Types.IRequestDataWithEvents) => { + const status = checkStatus(request).toLowerCase(); + return selectedStatuses.length === 0 || selectedStatuses.includes(status); +}; + +const matchesTab = (request: Types.IRequestDataWithEvents) => { + return currentTab === "All" || + (currentTab === "Get Paid" && request.payee?.value?.toLowerCase() === signer?.toLowerCase()) || + (currentTab === "Pay" && request.payer?.value?.toLowerCase() === signer?.toLowerCase()); +}; + +$: filteredRequests = requests?.filter((request) => { + const terms = searchQuery.toLowerCase(); + + if (!matchesNetwork(request) || !matchesTxType(request) || + !matchesStatus(request) || !matchesTab(request)) { + return false; + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte(1 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte(11 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (3)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:236-247
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T04:03:25.560Z
Learning: In the `checkApproval` function of `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte` (TypeScript/Svelte code), remember that the `ETH_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT` payment network ID does not require approval because Ether payments do not need ERC20 approvals.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, mapping payment network IDs to their respective approval functions in the `checkApproval` function is acceptable and can improve readability and maintainability.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, prefer using `if`/`else if` structures over mapping in the `checkApproval` function for better readability.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (6)
444-444: Use console.error for general error handling.
For consistency with error handling patterns, use console.error instead of console.log.
- console.log("General approval check error:", error);
+ console.error("General approval check error:", error);392-394: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use console.error for payment currency validation.
For consistency with error handling patterns, use console.error instead of console.log.
- console.log("Invalid payment currency:", paymentCurrencies[0]);
+ console.error("Invalid payment currency:", paymentCurrencies[0]);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
403-406: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use console.error for network mismatch.
For consistency with error handling patterns, use console.error instead of console.log.
- console.log("Wrong network:", {
+ console.error("Wrong network:", {
current: `0x${chainId.toString(16)}`,
expected: expectedChainId,
});Likely invalid or redundant comment.
414-421: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify ERC20_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT approval check.
The current implementation has redundant error handling with both .catch() and try/catch. Simplify it to use a single error handling approach.
try {
- return await hasErc20Approval(requestData!, address!, signer).catch(
- () => false
- );
+ return await hasErc20Approval(requestData!, address!, signer);
} catch {
- console.log("ERC20_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT approval check failed");
+ console.error("ERC20_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT approval check failed");
return false;
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
428-439: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY approval check.
Similar to the previous comment, simplify the error handling approach and use console.error.
try {
return await hasErc20ApprovalForProxyConversion(
requestData!,
address!,
paymentCurrencies[0]?.address,
signer,
requestData.expectedAmount
- ).catch(() => false);
+ );
} catch {
- console.log("ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY approval check failed");
+ console.error("ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY approval check failed");
return false;
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
377-381: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use console.error for dependency validation failures.
For better debugging and consistency with error handling patterns, use console.error instead of console.log for reporting missing dependencies.
- console.log("Missing dependencies:", {
+ console.error("Missing required arguments for approval check:", {
network: paymentNetworkExtension?.id,
address,
signer: !!signer,
});⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, mapping payment network IDs to their respective approval functions in the `checkApproval` function is acceptable and can improve readability and maintainability.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:236-247
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T04:03:25.560Z
Learning: In the `checkApproval` function of `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte` (TypeScript/Svelte code), remember that the `ETH_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT` payment network ID does not require approval because Ether payments do not need ERC20 approvals.
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (2)
20-20: LGTM: Well-structured state management for filters
The new state variables and options are properly initialized with clear types and default values, following Svelte's best practices.
Also applies to: 110-129
466-487: LGTM: Robust error handling implementation
The error handling for decryption is comprehensive, with proper user feedback via toast notifications and appropriate loading state management. The preservation of network selection during requests is a nice touch for UX.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (2)
502-513: Add error handling for network refresh operation.While the network selection handler includes proper loading state management, it should handle potential errors during the refresh operation.
const handleNetworkSelection = async (networks: string[]) => { selectedNetworks = networks; currentPage = 1; if (networks.length === 0 && selectedNetworks.length > 0) { loading = true; try { await getRequests(account!, requestNetwork!); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to refresh requests:', error); + toast.error('Failed to refresh the request list'); } finally { loading = false; } } };
272-294: Consider refactoring filter logic for better maintainability.The current implementation works correctly but could be more maintainable. Consider extracting filter conditions into separate functions.
$: filteredRequests = requests?.filter((request) => { const terms = searchQuery.toLowerCase(); const network = request.currencyInfo.network; const txType = signer === request.payer?.value ? "OUT" : "IN"; const status = checkStatus(request).toLowerCase(); - const networkMatch = - selectedNetworks.length === 0 || - (network && selectedNetworks.includes(network)); - - const txTypeMatch = - selectedTxTypes.length === 0 || selectedTxTypes.includes(txType); - - const statusMatch = - selectedStatuses.length === 0 || selectedStatuses.includes(status); + const matchesNetwork = (network: string | undefined) => + selectedNetworks.length === 0 || + (network && selectedNetworks.includes(network)); + + const matchesTxType = (type: string) => + selectedTxTypes.length === 0 || selectedTxTypes.includes(type); + + const matchesStatus = (status: string) => + selectedStatuses.length === 0 || selectedStatuses.includes(status); if ( - networkMatch && - txTypeMatch && - statusMatch && + matchesNetwork(network) && + matchesTxType(txType) && + matchesStatus(status) && (currentTab === "All" || (currentTab === "Get Paid" && request.payee?.value?.toLowerCase() === signer?.toLowerCase()) || (currentTab === "Pay" && request.payer?.value?.toLowerCase() === signer?.toLowerCase())) ) {shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (3)
8-14: Consider enhancing type safetyThe options type could be more strictly defined using a discriminated union based on the
typeprop to ensure type-specific values are valid.type BaseOption = { checked?: boolean }; type NetworkOption = BaseOption & { value: string }; // Add network-specific values type TransactionOption = BaseOption & { value: 'IN' | 'OUT' }; type StatusOption = BaseOption & { value: 'PENDING' | 'COMPLETED' | 'CANCELED' }; export let options: NetworkOption[] | TransactionOption[] | StatusOption[] = [];
43-78: Enhance keyboard navigation accessibilityWhile the keyboard navigation is well-implemented, consider these improvements:
- Add Home/End key support to jump to first/last options
- Add Page Up/Down support for faster scrolling
function handleKeydown(event: KeyboardEvent) { // ... existing code ... switch (event.key) { + case "Home": + event.preventDefault(); + focusedIndex = 0; + break; + case "End": + event.preventDefault(); + focusedIndex = filteredOptions.length - 1; + break; + case "PageUp": + event.preventDefault(); + focusedIndex = Math.max(focusedIndex - 5, 0); + break; + case "PageDown": + event.preventDefault(); + focusedIndex = Math.min(focusedIndex + 5, filteredOptions.length - 1); + break; // ... existing cases ... } }
180-180: Review z-index managementThe z-index values (200 for overlay, 1200 for dropdown) are quite high and could potentially conflict with other UI elements. Consider implementing a z-index management system with lower values.
.dropdown-overlay { - z-index: 200; + z-index: 20; } .dropdown-menu { - z-index: 1200; + z-index: 21; }Also applies to: 219-219
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (2)
Line range hint
529-559: Consider enhancing type safety and code organization.The balance checking logic is well-implemented, but could benefit from:
- Type definitions for the payment currencies
- Extraction of the balance checking logic into separate functions for better maintainability
+ type PaymentCurrency = { + type: string; + address?: string; + symbol?: string; + }; + + async function checkERC20Balance( + address: string, + currency: PaymentCurrency, + chainId: number + ) { + const balance = await getBalance(wagmiConfig, { + address, + token: currency.address as `0x${string}`, + chainId, + }); + return { + formatted: balance.formatted, + hasEnough: balance.value >= BigInt(request.expectedAmount), + }; + } + + async function checkNativeBalance( + address: string, + chainId: number + ) { + const balance = await getBalance(wagmiConfig, { + address, + chainId, + }); + return { + formatted: balance.formatted, + hasEnough: balance.value >= BigInt(request.expectedAmount), + }; + } + async function checkBalance() { try { if (!address || !paymentCurrencies[0] || !network) { console.error("Missing required parameters for balance check:", { address, paymentCurrency: paymentCurrencies[0], network, }); return; } const invoiceNetworkId = Number(getNetworkIdFromNetworkName(network)); if (account.chainId !== invoiceNetworkId) { hasEnoughBalance = false; console.log("Wrong network - balance check skipped"); return; } + const result = paymentCurrencies[0]?.type === Types.RequestLogic.CURRENCY.ERC20 + ? await checkERC20Balance(address, paymentCurrencies[0], invoiceNetworkId) + : await checkNativeBalance(address, invoiceNetworkId); + + userBalance = result.formatted; + hasEnoughBalance = result.hasEnough; - if (paymentCurrencies[0]?.type === Types.RequestLogic.CURRENCY.ERC20) { - const balance = await getBalance(wagmiConfig, { - address, - token: paymentCurrencies[0].address as `0x${string}`, - chainId: invoiceNetworkId, - }); - userBalance = balance.formatted; - hasEnoughBalance = balance.value >= BigInt(request.expectedAmount); - } else { - const balance = await getBalance(wagmiConfig, { - address, - chainId: invoiceNetworkId, - }); - userBalance = balance.formatted; - hasEnoughBalance = balance.value >= BigInt(request.expectedAmount); - } } catch (err) { console.error("Error checking balance:", err); hasEnoughBalance = false; userBalance = "0"; } }
Line range hint
1-24: Consider implementing a dedicated payment service.The component currently handles complex payment logic directly. Consider extracting the payment-related functionality (approval checks, balance checks, and payment processing) into a dedicated service class. This would:
- Improve separation of concerns
- Make the component more maintainable
- Make the payment logic reusable
- Facilitate easier testing
Example structure:
// services/PaymentService.ts export class PaymentService { constructor( private wagmiConfig: any, private currencyManager: any ) {} async checkApproval(/* ... */) { /* ... */ } async checkBalance(/* ... */) { /* ... */ } async processPayment(/* ... */) { /* ... */ } } // invoice-view.svelte const paymentService = new PaymentService(wagmiConfig, currencyManager);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte(2 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte(11 hunks)shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (3)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:236-247
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T04:03:25.560Z
Learning: In the `checkApproval` function of `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte` (TypeScript/Svelte code), remember that the `ETH_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT` payment network ID does not require approval because Ether payments do not need ERC20 approvals.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, mapping payment network IDs to their respective approval functions in the `checkApproval` function is acceptable and can improve readability and maintainability.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, prefer using `if`/`else if` structures over mapping in the `checkApproval` function for better readability.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (4)
20-20: Well-structured state management for filters!
The initialization of filter states and options is clean and follows best practices. The separation between static options (status, transaction types) and dynamic options (networks) is appropriate.
Also applies to: 110-129
567-618: Clean implementation of filter UI components!
The filter UI implementation is well-structured with:
- Appropriate use of SearchableDropdownCheckbox for each filter type
- Consistent configuration across filters
- Smart disabling of search for transaction type filter
464-496: Robust error handling and state preservation!
The improvements to loadRequests are valuable:
- Preserves network selection during refresh, preventing UI jumps
- Provides clear error feedback for decryption failures
- Properly manages loading states
1209-1218: Clean and consistent styling!
The new styles for filter controls maintain consistency with the existing design while providing proper spacing and alignment.
shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (3)
16-20: Fix potential XSS vulnerability
Using {@html} with template literals could potentially lead to XSS attacks if the CheckIcon content is ever dynamically generated.
130-169: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve dropdown menu accessibility
Consider these accessibility enhancements:
- Add
aria-controlsto connect the button with the dropdown menu - Add announcements for the number of filtered options
- Improve focus management when opening/closing the dropdown
<button
type="button"
on:click={toggleDropdown}
on:keydown={handleKeydown}
class="dropdown-button"
aria-haspopup="listbox"
aria-expanded={isOpen}
+ aria-controls="dropdown-menu"
>
{#if isOpen}
- <div class="dropdown-menu" role="listbox" tabindex="-1">
+ <div
+ id="dropdown-menu"
+ class="dropdown-menu"
+ role="listbox"
+ tabindex="-1"
+ aria-label={`${filteredOptions.length} options available`}
+ >Likely invalid or redundant comment.
12-12: Verify filter type implementations
Let's verify that all filter types are properly implemented and used consistently across the Invoice Dashboard.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the component usage.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
Filter types are correctly implemented and used
The component's filter types are properly implemented and used in the Invoice Dashboard:
- The "status" type is used with status options (paid, partially paid, accepted, etc.)
- The "transaction" type is used with IN/OUT transaction types
- The "network" type is used with blockchain network options
All filter types are consistently used and properly bound to their respective filter handlers (handleStatusSelection, handleTxTypeSelection, handleNetworkSelection).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of filter types across the codebase
# Search for component usage with different filter types
echo "Checking filter type implementations..."
rg -A 5 "searchable-checkbox-dropdown"
# Check for any hardcoded filter values that should match the type prop
echo "Checking for hardcoded filter values..."
rg -g '!*.test.*' -g '!*.spec.*' '"(network|transaction|status)".*type='
Length of output: 1062
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the component usage in view-requests.svelte
echo "Checking component usage in view-requests.svelte..."
cat "packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte"
# Search for any other files that might use this component
echo -e "\nChecking for other component usages..."
fd -e svelte -x grep -l "searchable-checkbox-dropdown"
Length of output: 35959
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (3)
43-78: Enhance keyboard navigation implementationThe keyboard navigation implementation is good but could be improved for better accessibility:
- The focused item should be automatically scrolled into view
- Home/End keys are not handled
- Tab navigation between options is not prevented
function handleKeydown(event: KeyboardEvent) { if (!isOpen) { if ( event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " " || event.key === "ArrowDown" ) { event.preventDefault(); isOpen = true; } return; } switch (event.key) { + case "Tab": + event.preventDefault(); + break; + case "Home": + event.preventDefault(); + focusedIndex = 0; + break; + case "End": + event.preventDefault(); + focusedIndex = filteredOptions.length - 1; + break; case "ArrowDown": event.preventDefault(); focusedIndex = Math.min(focusedIndex + 1, filteredOptions.length - 1); + scrollIntoView(focusedIndex); break; case "ArrowUp": event.preventDefault(); focusedIndex = Math.max(focusedIndex - 1, 0); + scrollIntoView(focusedIndex); break; // ... rest of the code ... } } +function scrollIntoView(index: number) { + const element = dropdownContainer?.querySelector( + `.dropdown-item:nth-child(${index + 1})` + ); + element?.scrollIntoView({ block: "nearest" }); +}
130-131: Improve dropdown menu accessibilityThe dropdown menu's accessibility can be enhanced with additional ARIA attributes and keyboard interaction improvements.
- <div class="dropdown-menu" role="listbox" tabindex="-1"> + <div + class="dropdown-menu" + role="listbox" + tabindex="-1" + aria-multiselectable="true" + aria-label={`${placeholder} options`} + aria-activedescendant={focusedIndex >= 0 ? `option-${focusedIndex}` : undefined} + >
143-151: Enhance list item accessibilityList items need unique IDs and better ARIA labeling for screen readers.
<li class="dropdown-item" class:selected={option.checked} class:focused={index === focusedIndex} on:click={() => selectOption(option.value)} role="option" aria-selected={option.checked} - tabindex="-1" + id={`option-${index}`} + aria-label={`${option.value} ${option.checked ? 'selected' : ''}`} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (4)
16-20: Fix potential XSS vulnerability
Using {@html} with template literals could potentially lead to XSS attacks if the CheckIcon content is ever dynamically generated or comes from user input.
1-304: Overall implementation looks good!
The searchable checkbox dropdown component is well-implemented with proper TypeScript types, event handling, and styling. While there are some opportunities for accessibility improvements and security considerations, the core functionality is solid and aligns well with the PR objectives of adding advanced filtering options to the Invoice Dashboard.
219-229: Consider z-index stacking context
The dropdown menu uses a high z-index value (1200) which might cause issues with other overlays or modals in the application.
Let's check for potential z-index conflicts:
207-210: Ensure focus visibility meets WCAG standards
The focus outline uses a custom color from CSS variables. Ensure that the outline has sufficient contrast for accessibility.
Let's check the color contrast ratio:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (2)
589-620: Consider improving mobile responsiveness of filter controlsThe filter controls implementation is clean and functional. However, the current CSS might cause overflow issues on mobile devices.
Consider adding a media query for better mobile layout:
.dropdown-controls { display: flex; align-items: center; margin-left: auto; gap: 8px; + @media only screen and (max-width: 880px) { + margin-left: 0; + flex-wrap: wrap; + } }Also applies to: 1217-1226
466-498: Enhance error message for better user feedbackWhile the error handling is generally good, the error message could be more informative for users.
Consider enhancing the error message:
- toast.error("Failed to enable decryption."); + toast.error("Failed to enable decryption", { + description: "Please ensure you're connected to the correct network and try again.", + duration: 5000 + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte(2 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (3)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, mapping payment network IDs to their respective approval functions in the `checkApproval` function is acceptable and can improve readability and maintainability.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:236-247
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T04:03:25.560Z
Learning: In the `checkApproval` function of `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte` (TypeScript/Svelte code), remember that the `ETH_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT` payment network ID does not require approval because Ether payments do not need ERC20 approvals.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, prefer using `if`/`else if` structures over mapping in the `checkApproval` function for better readability.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (3)
110-129: LGTM: Well-structured filter state management
The implementation of filter state variables and options is clean and comprehensive, covering all necessary request states and transaction types.
504-525: LGTM: Robust filter handlers with proper error handling
The filter handler implementations are well-designed with:
- Proper error handling for network selection
- Consistent pagination reset
- Selection preservation during network reloads
272-294: Test coverage needed for request filtering logic
The filtering logic implementation looks good, but it requires test coverage to ensure reliability.
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (4)
Line range hint 530-566: LGTM! Well-structured balance checking logic.
The implementation correctly handles:
- Parameter validation with proper error logging
- Network validation before balance check
- Different token types (ERC20 and native)
- Error cases with appropriate fallback values
378-382:
Use console.error for error conditions.
The missing arguments check should use console.error instead of console.log as this represents an error condition.
- console.log("Missing required arguments for approval check:", {
+ console.error("Missing required arguments for approval check:", {⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:236-247
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T04:03:25.560Z
Learning: In the `checkApproval` function of `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte` (TypeScript/Svelte code), remember that the `ETH_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT` payment network ID does not require approval because Ether payments do not need ERC20 approvals.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, mapping payment network IDs to their respective approval functions in the `checkApproval` function is acceptable and can improve readability and maintainability.
411-418: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify error handling in ERC20_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT approval check.
The .catch(() => false) pattern is redundant since the outer try-catch already handles errors. Consider using a try-catch block for better error handling and logging.
if (
paymentNetworkExtension.id ===
Types.Extension.PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID.ERC20_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT
) {
- return await hasErc20Approval(requestData!, address!, signer).catch(
- () => false
- );
+ try {
+ return await hasErc20Approval(requestData!, address!, signer);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("ERC20_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT approval check failed:", error);
+ return false;
+ }
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
420-431: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify error handling in ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY approval check.
Similar to the previous issue, the error handling can be improved using a try-catch block.
if (
paymentNetworkExtension.id ===
Types.Extension.PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID.ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY
) {
+ try {
return await hasErc20ApprovalForProxyConversion(
requestData!,
address!,
paymentCurrencies[0]?.address,
signer,
requestData.expectedAmount
- ).catch(() => false);
+ );
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY approval check failed:", error);
+ return false;
+ }
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (1)
386-391: Consider using console.info instead of console.log.
“Payment already completed” is informational and not an error condition, so you might use console.info or console.debug for clarity.shared/components/dropdown.svelte (3)
5-9: Use a standalone Svelte component for icons for better maintainability.
While this inline SVG is concise, you could consider factoring out the CheckIcon into a dedicated Svelte component for improved reusability and clarity.
41-76: Potentially break down key-handling logic.
The handleKeydown function covers multiple cases, which is great. However, consider modularizing it or removing repeated conditions for improved readability and maintainability.
138-154: Well-implemented checkbox dropdown.
The structure is accessible, especially with the role="option" and aria-selected. Consider adding keyboard event handlers for improved accessibility.shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (2)
43-79: Good keyboard navigation support with minor improvements
Thank you for providing keyboard accessibility (Arrow Up/Down, Enter, Escape). As a minor enhancement, consider allowing Tab/Shift+Tab to move focus in and out of the dropdown seamlessly, rather than necessarily closing it.
133-140: Add ARIA label for search input
To further improve accessibility, consider providing an ARIA label or an associated label for the search field.Here’s an example of how you could add an ARIA label in the Input component usage:
<Input placeholder={searchPlaceholder} value={searchTerm} handleInput={handleSearchInput} + aria-label="Search dropdown options" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte(2 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte(9 hunks)shared/components/dropdown.svelte(9 hunks)shared/components/input.svelte(3 hunks)shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (3)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, mapping payment network IDs to their respective approval functions in the `checkApproval` function is acceptable and can improve readability and maintainability.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:236-247
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T04:03:25.560Z
Learning: In the `checkApproval` function of `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte` (TypeScript/Svelte code), remember that the `ETH_FEE_PROXY_CONTRACT` payment network ID does not require approval because Ether payments do not need ERC20 approvals.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#141
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In `packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte`, prefer using `if`/`else if` structures over mapping in the `checkApproval` function for better readability.
🔇 Additional comments (48)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/dashboard/invoice-view.svelte (8)
376-385: Use console.error for missing arguments.
This error condition should be logged via console.error rather than console.log for consistency with error-level logging.
392-397: No issues found.
The error handling for invalid payment currency looks good.
398-402: No issues found.
Chain ID conversion logic appears correct.
403-410: No issues found.
The network mismatch check is appropriate and uses console.error for the error condition.
415-417: Remove redundant catch in hasErc20Approval call.
Consider removing the .catch(() => false) pattern and relying solely on the surrounding try-catch for error handling.
424-430: Remove redundant catch in hasErc20ApprovalForProxyConversion call.
Similar to the above, the .catch(() => false) pattern is unnecessary within a try-catch block.
435-437: No issues found.
General error logging is handled properly here.
532-532: No issues found.
It’s correct to log missing parameters as an error for clarity and debugging.
shared/components/dropdown.svelte (17)
22-23: Ensure synchronization between props & local state.
If the parent updates the options array, ensure that localOptions remains in sync; consider using a reactive statement if changes to props need to be immediately reflected.
27-32: Toggle logic confirmed.
The mapping approach to toggle the checked state is straightforward and clear.
81-81: Reset logic seems correct.
Resetting the focus index helps ensure a consistent user experience when closing the dropdown.
108-108: Nice overlay approach.
Using a lightweight overlay and clicking it to close the dropdown is a clean solution for handling outside clicks.
117-124: Keyboard accessibility on the trigger is handled properly.
You’re already using the handleKeydown on the button. Good job ensuring this is accessible.
160-160: Nitpick: Minimally changed line.
No issues found.
184-184: Fit-content usage.
Using width: fit-content can cause layout variations in certain parent containers. Keep an eye on cross-browser compatibility.
200-203: Ensuring adequate button width & layout.
These changes appear minor but can enhance responsive layout for various screen sizes.
208-208: Improved focus indication.
Setting box-shadow is an excellent way to communicate focus states.
219-220: Expanding the dropdown for long option labels.
Using min-width:100% encourages consistent sizing; be sure to test with narrower containers.
233-236: Proper vertical scroll for extensive item sets.
Limiting height to 200px with overflow-y ensures the UI remains navigable.
239-245: Spacing improvements in .dropdown-item.
Spacing and transitions look user-friendly.
248-249: Hover state is aligned with standard patterns.
No issues found here.
252-259: Compact and consistent checkbox styling.
Works nicely for a custom checkbox design.
262-264: Visual feedback for checked items.
Helpful for distinguishing selected states.
267-268: Focus color usage.
Applying a background highlight on focus is good for keyboard navigation.
271-272: No external outline for focus.
Matches the custom highlight approach. Ensure it meets accessibility contrast requirements.
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (14)
20-20: SearchableDropdownCheckbox import is well-introduced.
Bringing in the new filtering component aligns with the PR’s objectives to enhance filtering capabilities.
110-112: Initializing network filter arrays.
Storing selectedNetworks and networkOptions is straightforward. Ensure reactivity if these props depend on external changes.
113-118: Transaction type filtering.
Using dedicated arrays for selectedTxTypes is clear and maintainable.
119-130: Status filter arrays are well-structured.
Comprehensive status list covers the typical request states.
200-204: Sorted requests logic.
Retaining the .map() return is consistent, but ensure no unintentional data mutation.
[approve]
205-216: Unique networks creation.
Using a set is an efficient approach to avoid duplicates.
467-467: Preserving network selection.
Good strategy to store the user’s previous network filters across refreshes.
468-497: Enhanced decryption toggling with error handling.
The nested try/catch ensures that errors are caught before continuing. This is well-handled.
504-525: Filter change handlers.
Resetting current page after filter changes ensures no confusion if the last page becomes out of range.
569-577: Search input logic.
Well-structured to handle user input changes. Debouncing is recommended for performance, but you already have a debouncedUpdate onMount.
578-611: Decryption toggle and dropdown usage.
Enabling or disabling decryption on the fly is a nice user-facing feature. The chain, type, and status filters align with the PR's advanced filtering objective.
614-620: Checkbox-based column selection.
Allows users to customize displayed columns. This is well done for a flexible UI.
1029-1029: Spacing for search-wrapper.
This minor UI tweak helps separate filters from the table visually.
1217-1226: Filter container layout.
Aligning the dropdown controls on the right side is a good pattern for a filter row. The switch-wrapper for spacing is straightforward.
shared/components/input.svelte (6)
39-49: Checkbox label usage is user-friendly.
Associating the label with the checkbox is a solid pattern. This helps screen readers link the control with its text.
51-69: Icon slot usage for text input is flexible.
This approach is a neat solution to optionally show an icon. Good job making the input more versatile.
118-121: Wrapper ensures correct positioning.
The .text-input-wrapper provides a distinct container for both text and icon.
125-127: Absolute positioning for .input-icon.
Setting transform: translateY(-50%) vertically centers the icon correctly.
151-152: Padding shift for icon alignment.
The .text-input.has-icon class ensures text does not overlap the icon.
155-157: Native checkbox styling.
Using accent-color is a clean approach, but test across all major browsers for consistent visuals.
shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte (3)
16-20: Note on potential XSS with raw HTML
This was already discussed in a previous review comment. Using {@html} for an inline SVG is generally fine if it’s truly static, but if any untrusted content is ever introduced, it could become an XSS vector.
152-166: Verify fallback handling for unknown networks
When type="network," the component displays network icons by passing {option.value} into . Verify that there is a fallback for unknown or unsupported networks.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of getNetworkIcon to see how it handles unknown networks.
Unknown networks are properly handled with a fallback icon
The getNetworkIcon function has a proper fallback mechanism. It returns an Unknown icon component when the network is not found in the predefined list of supported networks (icons[network] || Unknown). This is then safely handled in the network-icon.svelte component which only renders if an icon is available.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search the codebase for references to <NetworkIcon> to verify
# whether there's any fallback mechanism for unknown networks.
rg -A 5 $'NetworkIcon'
Length of output: 2293
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of getNetworkIcon
ast-grep --pattern 'export const getNetworkIcon = $_'
Length of output: 1300
104-109: Confirm availability of config to avoid runtime errors
The code references config.colors.main and config.colors.secondary. If config is undefined or missing the colors property, this could trigger errors. Make sure that config is always provided or has sensible defaults.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the component's script section and any default configuration to verify how the config is handled.
Let me check for the IConfig interface definition and any default configurations in the codebase.
Let me check the shared utils config to see the default configuration implementation.
Config usage is properly handled with defaults and type safety
The component is safe from runtime errors because:
- The
configprop is properly typed withIConfiginterface which requires the colors property - A default configuration exists in shared utils with the required color values
- Other components in the codebase follow the pattern of falling back to the default config when needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for any usage of config and ensure defaults exist.
# We'll check for references to config in the codebase.
rg -A 3 $'config\.'
Length of output: 10665
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the script section in the searchable-checkbox-dropdown component
ast-grep --pattern 'script lang="ts">
$$$
</script>' shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte
# Also check for any default config or prop definitions
rg -A 5 "export let config" shared/components/searchable-checkbox-dropdown.svelte
Length of output: 534
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for IConfig interface definition
rg -A 5 "interface IConfig"
# Look for any default configurations
rg -A 5 "defaultConfig|DEFAULT_CONFIG"
Length of output: 5327
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the default config implementation in shared utils
rg -A 10 "export const config" shared/utils/config.ts
Length of output: 219
sstefdev
deleted the
183-request-invoicing-improve-filtering-on-invoice-dashboard
branch
Fixes #183
Problem
Users requested the ability to hide voided or canceled requests from the Invoice Dashboard and introduced filters for better usability:
Changes:
Screen.Recording.2024-12-18.at.18.04.31.mov
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style