fix: invalid address #275
fix: invalid address #275
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rodrigopavezi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes focus on enhancing the input validation and error handling of the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant formatAddress
participant Console
Caller->>formatAddress: Call with address
alt Invalid Address
formatAddress->>Console: Log "Address not set" or "Invalid address: <error>"
formatAddress-->>Caller: Return '-'
else Valid Address
formatAddress->>formatAddress: Format address
formatAddress-->>Caller: Return formatted address
end
The sequence diagram illustrates the validation flow for the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/utils/formatAddress.ts (1)
9-9: Optimize validation order for better performanceThe current validation chain could attempt to run
checkAddresson empty strings. Consider reordering checks from cheapest to most expensive.- if (!address || address.length === 0 || !checkAddress(address)) { + if (!address || address.length === 0) { + throw new Error("Address cannot be empty"); + } + if (!checkAddress(address)) { + throw new Error("Invalid address format"); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/utils/formatAddress.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/utils/formatAddress.ts (1)
Line range hint 9-14: Verify the impact on error handling in consuming components
The change in error handling behavior might affect components that use this utility.
…error handling and return a placeholder for invalid input
…details for better debugging
… improve error handling for invalid addresses
… utility for cleaner code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/utils/formatAddress.ts (2)
12-18: Enhance error handling and loggingThe error handling could be improved with more specific error types and structured logging.
Consider these improvements:
try { + // Sanitize input: remove whitespace and ensure lowercase + const sanitizedAddress = address.trim().toLowerCase(); - const checksumAddress = getAddress(address); + const checksumAddress = getAddress(sanitizedAddress); return `${checksumAddress.slice(0, first)}...${checksumAddress.slice(-last)}`; } catch (error) { - console.error("Invalid address: ", error); + // Consider using a proper logging service + console.error("[formatAddress] Invalid Ethereum address", { + address, + error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error) + }); return '-'; }
1-18: Consider broader architectural implicationsWhile the current implementation handles invalid addresses gracefully, consider these architectural improvements:
- Implement proper address validation at the form input level to catch invalid addresses early
- Consider using a shared validation utility across the application
- Use a proper logging service instead of console methods
- Consider implementing an error boundary in React components to handle address formatting errors gracefully
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/utils/formatAddress.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/utils/formatAddress.ts (1)
13-13: Verify viem's getAddress usage across the codebase
Let's ensure consistent address validation across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Address validation is consistently implemented using viem across the codebase
The codebase shows consistent usage of viem's address validation utilities:
getAddress()is used for checksum address formatting informatAddress.tsandprepareRequest.tsisAddress()is used in the shared utilitycheckEthAddress.ts- No conflicting or inconsistent address validation patterns were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other instances of address validation
# to ensure consistent usage of viem's getAddress
# Look for other address validation patterns
rg -t typescript -t javascript "getAddress|isAddress|checkAddress" --no-heading
# Look for potential address validation functions
ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($PARAMS) {
$$$
address
$$$
}'
Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for getAddress usage with ripgrep, fixing the file type flags
rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx}' -t ts -t js "getAddress" -A 2
# Search for address validation patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx}' -t ts -t js "isAddress|checkAddress|validateAddress" -A 2
# Look for files that might contain address-related utilities
fd -e ts -e js -e tsx -e jsx | grep -i "address"
Length of output: 4372
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ters for cleaner implementation
Fixes #274
Changes
fix: Enhance address validation in formatAddress utility to check for empty input
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation