Skip to content

BVP cleanup - #4405

Merged
AayushSabharwal merged 2 commits into
SciML:masterfrom
SebastianM-C:smc/bvp_cleanup
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

BVP cleanup#4405
AayushSabharwal merged 2 commits into
SciML:masterfrom
SebastianM-C:smc/bvp_cleanup

Conversation

@SebastianM-C

@SebastianM-C SebastianM-C commented Mar 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a bug in the BVP interpolation and I added some tests
that were using the internals of BVP solvers. That is no longer needed.

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

See also SciML/BoundaryValueDiffEq.jl#452
The tests should pass once that merges (and it's released).

The discrepancy between the interpolation
methods is fixed by
SciML/BoundaryValueDiffEq.jl#452
for the BVP case the solution is more precise at default tolerances
@SebastianM-C

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@AayushSabharwal can you take a look at this one too? It should clean up the workarounds for some old interpolation bug that was fixed

@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@AayushSabharwal
AayushSabharwal merged commit 6cc90cb into SciML:master Aug 7, 2026
81 of 92 checks passed
@SebastianM-C
SebastianM-C deleted the smc/bvp_cleanup branch August 7, 2026 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants