fix(docs): Added a GitHub action for markdown link check. #5997
Conversation
|
Rakavitha Kodhandapani seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
| name: Broken link report | ||
| about: Automated issue template for reporting link checker fails | ||
| title: Failing link check ({{ date | date('dddd, MMMM Do') }}) | ||
| labels: bug, automated issue, link check |
| @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
| name: Check all Markdown links daily | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As the main branch is not v2 in the github repo, this will also require a "dummy" workflow checked in in the main master branch in a follow up PR. check here for an example: https://github.com/SeldonIO/seldon-core/blob/master/.github/workflows/license.yml
| @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
| name: Check all Markdown links daily | |||
|
|
|||
| on: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should we also add manual trigger option and push on v2?
| --- | ||
| name: Broken link report | ||
| about: Automated issue template for reporting link checker fails | ||
| title: Failing link check ({{ date | date('dddd, MMMM Do') }}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this should follow v2 title template: fix(docs): ...
| @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could you explain the logic behind this file for review?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer: