Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[spark] Stop checking if volume to mount in k8s exists locally #148

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

nemacysts
Copy link
Member

It's entirely possible (and not an error) to create a podspec that contains paths to volume-mount that do not exist wherever service_configuration_lib is being invoked from.

As long as we ensure that we don't double-add things (which is only a problem due to the way that the env var keys are constructed here), skipping the existence check should be fine.

It's entirely possible (and not an error) to create a podspec that
contains paths to volume-mount that do not exist wherever
service_configuration_lib is being invoked from.

As long as we ensure that we don't double-add things (which is only a
problem due to the way that the env var keys are constructed here),
skipping the existence check should be fine.
@nemacysts
Copy link
Member Author

I think

**_get_k8s_docker_volumes_conf(volumes),
is the only place where we might run an executor with these files missing - but the container runtime should be fine with that: it'll simply create empty folders on-host rather than crash

(if we want to avoid that, I can update just that callsite to check for file existence)

@nemacysts nemacysts requested a review from jsleight September 9, 2024 21:34
@nemacysts nemacysts changed the title Stop checking if volume to mount in k8s exists locally [spark] Stop checking if volume to mount in k8s exists locally Sep 9, 2024
@nemacysts nemacysts merged commit 8c896ae into master Sep 10, 2024
1 check passed
nemacysts added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants