mops watch #254
mops watch #254
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily enhancing functionality in the CLI and related modules. Key updates include the addition of a new case in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 25
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
cli/commands/watch/globMoFiles.ts (1)
1-11: Consider usingconstforglobConfigThe
globConfigobject is currently declared withlet. If this configuration is not intended to be reassigned later in the code, it's a good practice to useconstinstead. This helps prevent accidental reassignment and makes the code's intent clearer.Here's the suggested change:
-let globConfig = { +const globConfig = { nocase: true, ignore: [ '**/node_modules/**', '**/.mops/**', '**/.vessel/**', '**/.git/**', ], };cli/parallel.ts (1)
17-17: Consider handling the potentialundefinedcase fromshift()While casting
items.shift()toTworks, it might be safer to handle the potentialundefinedcase explicitly. This would make the code more robust and prevent potential runtime errors if the array becomes empty unexpectedly.Consider updating the line as follows:
-fn(items.shift() as T).then(() => { +const item = items.shift(); +if (item !== undefined) { + fn(item).then(() => { + busyThreads--; + loop(); + }); +} else { + busyThreads--; + loop(); +}This change ensures that
fnis only called with a defined item, and the loop continues correctly even ifitemsbecomes empty unexpectedly.docs/docs/cli/5-toolchain/05-mops-toolchain-bin.md (2)
31-55: Great addition! Consider a minor clarification.The new "Run tool" section is a valuable addition to the documentation. It clearly explains how to use the
mops toolchain bincommand to run various tools and provides consistent examples.To further improve clarity, consider adding a brief explanation of why users might want to run tools this way (e.g., ensuring version consistency across the project).
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
34-34: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
39-39: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
44-44: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
49-49: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
54-54: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
34-34: Add language specifications to code blocksTo improve consistency and enable syntax highlighting, please add language specifications to the following code blocks:
- Line 35: Add
bashafter the opening triple backticks- Line 40: Add
bashafter the opening triple backticks- Line 45: Add
bashafter the opening triple backticks- Line 50: Add
bashafter the opening triple backticks- Line 55: Add
bashafter the opening triple backticksFor example, change:
to:
Also applies to: 39-39, 44-44, 49-49, 54-54
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
34-34: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
cli/commands/watch/parseDfxJson.ts (1)
5-42: LGTM! Consider improving readability.The
DfxConfigtype definition is comprehensive and well-structured. It covers various aspects of a dfx configuration, including canister types and network settings. The use of optional properties is appropriate.To improve readability, consider breaking down the large
canistersproperty into smaller, named types. For example:type CanisterDeclarations = { output: string; node_compatibility: boolean; }; type CanisterFrontend = { entrypoint: string; }; type CanisterRemote = { id: { ic: string; staging: string; }; }; type Canister = { type: 'motoko' | 'assets'; main?: string; specified_id?: string; declarations?: CanisterDeclarations; build?: string[]; frontend?: CanisterFrontend; source?: string[]; remote?: CanisterRemote; }; type DfxConfig = { // ... other properties canisters: { [key: string]: Canister; }; // ... remaining properties };This approach would make the main
DfxConfigtype more concise and easier to understand at a glance.dfx.json (2)
Line range hint
2-2: Consider updating the schema referenceThe
$schemareference is currently pointing to a specific version of the dfx.json schema. With the update to dfx 0.23.0, there might be an updated schema available.Consider checking if there's a new schema version corresponding to dfx 0.23.0 and update the reference if necessary. You can typically find the latest schema in the dfinity/sdk repository or in the official documentation.
Line range hint
1-79: Review new features and best practices for dfx 0.23.0While the existing configuration appears compatible with the new dfx version, there might be new features or best practices introduced in version 0.23.0 that could benefit your project.
I recommend reviewing the dfx 0.23.0 release notes and documentation to identify any new features, optimizations, or best practices that could be applied to your configuration. This could potentially improve your development workflow or canister performance.
Some areas to look out for:
- New canister configuration options
- Improved build or deployment processes
- Enhanced security features
- Performance optimizations
If you find any relevant improvements, consider updating your
dfx.jsonaccordingly.backend/main/registry/getDefaultPackages.mo (1)
40-40: LGTM! Consider future refactoring for maintainability.The addition of the case for dfx version "0.23.0" is correct and consistent with the existing pattern. It appropriately maps to the base package version "0.11.2", which aligns with the previous version.
As this switch statement continues to grow with each new dfx version, consider refactoring this function in the future to improve maintainability. Some options to consider:
- Use a data structure (e.g., a hash map) to store version mappings.
- Implement a more dynamic version comparison logic to reduce the need for explicit case statements.
These refactoring suggestions are not urgent but could be beneficial as the number of versions increases.
cli/commands/test/mmf1.ts (1)
56-58: LGTM! Consider adding type annotation for better type safety.The
getErrorMessages()method is a well-implemented addition to theMMF1class. It efficiently filters and maps theoutputarray to retrieve error messages from failed tests.For improved type safety and code clarity, consider adding a return type annotation:
- getErrorMessages() { + getErrorMessages(): string[] { return this.output.filter(out => out.type === 'fail').map(out => out.message); }cli/cli.ts (1)
396-408: LGTM: New watch command implementation.The
watchcommand is well-implemented with clear options covering various development aspects. It follows the existing pattern in the file and includes proper config file checking.Suggestions for potential improvements:
- Consider adding a
--verboseoption for more detailed output, similar to other commands.- The
--deployoption might benefit from additional parameters (e.g., network selection) to provide more control over the deployment process.Would you like me to provide an example of how to implement these suggestions?
cli/commands/watch/generator.ts (4)
44-81: Consider Adding Timeout Handling for Long-Running ProcessesThe
run()method executes external commands that could potentially hang or take an excessive amount of time. Implementing a timeout mechanism can prevent the application from waiting indefinitely.You can add a timeout option to the
execFilecall:await promisify(execFile)('dfx', ['generate', canister], { cwd: rootDir, signal, + timeout: 60000, // timeout after 60 seconds }).catch((error) => {
11-11: Type Annotation Consistency for Class PropertiesThe class properties
verbose,canisters, anderrorCheckerhave type annotations in some places but not others. For consistency and readability, consider adding explicit type annotations to all class properties.Apply this diff:
export class Generator { - verbose = false; - canisters: Record<string, string> = {}; + verbose: boolean = false; + canisters: Record<string, string>; status: 'pending' | 'running' | 'syntax-error' | 'error' | 'success' = 'pending'; errorChecker: ErrorChecker;And in the constructor, since
canistersis being passed in:constructor({ verbose, canisters, errorChecker }: { verbose: boolean; canisters: Record<string, string>; errorChecker: ErrorChecker }) { this.verbose = verbose; - this.canisters = canisters; + this.canisters = { ...canisters }; this.errorChecker = errorChecker; }Also applies to: 21-24
58-58: Use Descriptive Variable Names for ReadabilityThe variable
rootDirindicates the root directory, but in the context ofparallelexecution, it might be clearer to rename it toprojectRootorworkspaceRootfor better clarity.Consider renaming:
- let rootDir = getRootDir(); + const projectRoot = getRootDir();And update its usage accordingly.
33-42: Handle Potential Race Conditions inabortCurrent()When aborting current operations, there might be race conditions if
this.currentRuncompletes beforeabortCurrent()is called. Ensure that the method handles such cases gracefully.Consider adding checks or using synchronization mechanisms to handle potential race conditions.
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (1)
138-138: Simplify complex expression for better readability.The use of nested ternary operators and function calls within a single line can make the code difficult to read and understand. Consider breaking down the expression into smaller, descriptive variables.
Refactored code:
- let count = (this.status === 'running' ? get : chalk.bold[this.errors.length > 0 ? 'redBright' : 'green'])(this.errors.length || this.success); + let value = this.errors.length || this.success; + let color = this.errors.length > 0 ? 'redBright' : 'green'; + let count = this.status === 'running' + ? get(value) + : chalk.bold[color](value.toString());
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
- backend/main/registry/getDefaultPackages.mo (1 hunks)
- cli/cli.ts (2 hunks)
- cli/commands/test/mmf1.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/test/reporters/silent-reporter.ts (2 hunks)
- cli/commands/test/test.ts (5 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/error-checker.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/generator.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/globMoFiles.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/parseDfxJson.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/tester.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/warning-checker.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/watch.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/parallel.ts (2 hunks)
- dfx.json (1 hunks)
- docs/docs/cli/5-toolchain/05-mops-toolchain-bin.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/docs/cli/5-toolchain/05-mops-toolchain-bin.md
34-34: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
39-39: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
44-44: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
49-49: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
54-54: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
cli/parallel.ts (1)
1-1: Excellent use of generics to improve type safety!The updated function signature with generics (
<T>) and explicit typing for thefnparameter significantly enhances type checking and makes the function more robust. This change improves code quality and reduces the potential for type-related errors.cli/commands/watch/parseDfxJson.ts (2)
44-51: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider improving error handling, performance, and readability.
The
getMotokoCanistersfunction is functional but could benefit from some improvements:
- Error Handling: Add try-catch blocks for JSON parsing and file reading operations.
- Performance: Consider using asynchronous file operations for better performance in larger projects.
- Readability: Break down the complex one-liner into multiple steps for better readability.
Here's a suggested refactor:
import { promises as fs } from 'node:fs'; export async function getMotokoCanisters(): Promise<Record<string, string>> { const dfxJsonPath = path.resolve(getRootDir(), 'dfx.json'); try { await fs.access(dfxJsonPath); } catch { return {}; } try { const dfxJsonContent = await fs.readFile(dfxJsonPath, 'utf8'); const dfxJson = JSON.parse(dfxJsonContent) as DfxConfig; return Object.entries(dfxJson.canisters) .filter(([_, canister]) => canister.type === 'motoko') .reduce((acc, [name, canister]) => { acc[name] = canister.main ?? ''; return acc; }, {} as Record<string, string>); } catch (error) { console.error(`Error reading or parsing dfx.json: ${error}`); return {}; } }This refactored version:
- Uses asynchronous file operations
- Adds error handling for file reading and JSON parsing
- Improves readability by breaking down the operations
- Returns a Promise, so the function should be used with
awaitor.then()Let's verify the usage of this function in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of getMotokoCanisters function # Test: Search for getMotokoCanisters usage rg --type typescript "getMotokoCanisters\(\)"
1-3: LGTM! Consider verifying the custom import.The import statements look good. The use of 'node:' prefix for built-in modules is a good practice.
Let's verify the custom import:
cli/commands/test/mmf1.ts (1)
56-58: Update documentation and tests for the new method.The
getErrorMessages()method is a valuable addition to theMMF1class. To ensure its proper integration and usage:
- Update the class documentation to mention this new method and its purpose.
- Add unit tests to verify the behavior of
getErrorMessages()with various scenarios (e.g., no errors, multiple errors).- Consider updating any existing documentation or README files that describe the
MMF1class functionality.To verify the impact and usage of this new method, you can run the following script:
cli/cli.ts (2)
28-28: LGTM: New import statement for the watch command.The import statement for the
watchfunction is correctly placed and follows the existing pattern in the file.
28-28: Summary: New watch command successfully integrated.The changes to
cli/cli.tsare focused and well-implemented:
- A new import for the
watchfunction has been added.- The
watchcommand has been successfully integrated into the CLI, following the existing patterns and best practices.These changes enhance the CLI's functionality without disrupting the existing structure. The new
watchcommand provides valuable development workflow improvements for Motoko projects.Also applies to: 396-408
cli/commands/test/reporters/silent-reporter.ts (2)
24-26: Ensure Correct Aggregation of Total FilesIn the
addFilesmethod,this.totalis set tofiles.length. IfaddFilescan be called multiple times, this could overwrite the existing total. Ensure thatthis.totalaccurately reflects the cumulative total of files.Suggested Verification:
If
addFilesmay be called multiple times, consider accumulating the total:addFiles(files: string[]) { - this.total = files.length; + this.total += files.length; }If
addFilesis called only once per instance, this change is unnecessary.
54-54: Confirm Progress Callback InvocationThe call to
this.onProgress();ensures that progress updates occur after each test run. This is appropriate and helps keep any progress indicators in sync.cli/commands/watch/generator.ts (1)
27-31: Ensurereset()Method Resets All Relevant StateThe
reset()method resetsstatus,success, anderrors, but it might also need to reset other state properties likeabortedorcontrollersto ensure the generator returns to a clean state.Run the following script to check for other properties that may need resetting:
cli/commands/test/test.ts (1)
130-130: Update function signature to include 'signal' parameterThe function signature of
testWithReporternow includes the optionalsignalparameter to support cancellation, which is a good addition for controlling test execution.
| import {globSync} from 'glob'; | ||
|
|
||
| let globConfig = { | ||
| nocase: true, | ||
| ignore: [ | ||
| '**/node_modules/**', | ||
| '**/.mops/**', | ||
| '**/.vessel/**', | ||
| '**/.git/**', | ||
| ], | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export function globMoFiles(rootDir : string) { | ||
| // return globSync('{src,test?(s)}/**/*.mo', {cwd: rootDir, ...globConfig}); | ||
| return globSync('src/**/*.mo', {cwd: rootDir, ...globConfig}); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling and file-level documentation
The file structure and purpose are clear, but there are two areas that could be improved:
- Error Handling: Consider adding try-catch block to handle potential errors from
globSync. - Documentation: Adding a file-level comment explaining the purpose and usage of this module would be beneficial.
Here's a suggested implementation incorporating these improvements:
/**
* This module provides functionality to glob Motoko (.mo) files in a given directory.
* It uses the `glob` package and ignores common directories like node_modules, .mops, etc.
*/
import {globSync} from 'glob';
const globConfig = {
nocase: true,
ignore: [
'**/node_modules/**',
'**/.mops/**',
'**/.vessel/**',
'**/.git/**',
],
};
export function globMoFiles(rootDir: string): string[] {
try {
return globSync('src/**/*.mo', {cwd: rootDir, ...globConfig});
} catch (error) {
console.error(`Error globbing .mo files: ${error.message}`);
return [];
}
}This implementation adds error handling and includes a file-level comment explaining the module's purpose.
| export function globMoFiles(rootDir : string) { | ||
| // return globSync('{src,test?(s)}/**/*.mo', {cwd: rootDir, ...globConfig}); | ||
| return globSync('src/**/*.mo', {cwd: rootDir, ...globConfig}); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Include test directory in glob pattern
The test directory contains .mo files that are currently excluded by the glob pattern. To ensure all relevant .mo files are captured, update the glob pattern to include the test directory.
- Change the glob pattern to
'src/**/*.{mo,test/**/*.mo}'to include thetestdirectory.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding explicit return type and clarify test directory inclusion
The globMoFiles function looks good, but there are two points to consider:
- Adding an explicit return type would improve type safety and code readability.
- There's a commented-out line that includes test directories. It might be worth discussing whether these should be included or not.
Here's a suggested modification with an explicit return type:
export function globMoFiles(rootDir: string): string[] {
// return globSync('{src,test?(s)}/**/*.mo', {cwd: rootDir, ...globConfig});
return globSync('src/**/*.mo', {cwd: rootDir, ...globConfig});
}Regarding the inclusion of test directories, let's check if there are .mo files in test directories:
This will help determine if including test directories in the glob pattern is necessary.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for .mo files in test directories
fd -e mo -t f . test tests | wc -l
Length of output: 91
| @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ | |||
| "packtool": "mops sources" | |||
| } | |||
| }, | |||
| "dfx": "0.22.0", | |||
| "dfx": "0.23.0", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
dfx Command is Missing in Development Environment
The dfx command was not found in the development environment. However, it is referenced in multiple scripts and configuration files throughout the codebase, indicating that it is required for the project.
package.jsonscripts referencedfx.- Numerous files in the codebase utilize
dfx.
Please ensure that dfx is properly installed and accessible in your PATH.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify dfx version update and check compatibility
The dfx version has been updated from 0.22.0 to 0.23.0. This minor version update may introduce new features or changes that could affect your project.
Please confirm that this update is intentional and that you have reviewed the changelog for version 0.23.0 to ensure compatibility with your project. You can find the changelog at: https://github.com/dfinity/sdk/releases
To verify the installed dfx version, you can run:
If the output matches 0.23.0, then the update has been successfully applied to your development environment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
dfx --version
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for 'dfx' references in package.json scripts
fd "dfx" --type f --extension json | xargs grep '"scripts"'
# Search for any local 'dfx' binaries or installation scripts
fd "dfx" --type f
# Search the entire repository for 'dfx' usage
rg "dfx"
Length of output: 18180
| flushOnError = true; | ||
| errorOutput = ''; | ||
| onProgress = () => {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to Avoid Redundant Default Values
The properties flushOnError and onProgress are assigned default values both in their declarations and in the constructor parameters. This redundancy can be eliminated to improve code clarity.
Suggested Refactor:
Option 1—Remove default values from property declarations:
- flushOnError = true;
- errorOutput = '';
- onProgress = () => {};
constructor(flushOnError = true, onProgress = () => {}) {
this.flushOnError = flushOnError;
this.onProgress = onProgress;
+ this.errorOutput = '';
}Option 2—Keep defaults in property declarations and adjust constructor parameters:
constructor(flushOnError?: boolean, onProgress?: () => void) {
if (flushOnError !== undefined) {
this.flushOnError = flushOnError;
}
if (onProgress !== undefined) {
this.onProgress = onProgress;
}
}Also applies to: 19-22
| console.log(chalk.red('✖'), absToRel(file)); | ||
| mmf.flush('fail'); | ||
| console.log('-'.repeat(50)); | ||
| let output = `${chalk.red('✖'), absToRel(file)}\n${mmf.getErrorMessages().join('\n')}\n${'-'.repeat(50)}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix Incorrect Use of Comma Operator in Template Literal
At line 44, the use of the comma operator within the template literal results in only the last expression being included. This means chalk.red('✖') is not output as intended.
Suggested Fix:
Replace the comma with a + operator or properly format the template literal:
-let output = `${chalk.red('✖'), absToRel(file)}\n${mmf.getErrorMessages().join('\n')}\n${'-'.repeat(50)}`;
+let output = `${chalk.red('✖')} ${absToRel(file)}\n${mmf.getErrorMessages().join('\n')}\n${'-'.repeat(50)}`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let output = `${chalk.red('✖'), absToRel(file)}\n${mmf.getErrorMessages().join('\n')}\n${'-'.repeat(50)}`; | |
| let output = `${chalk.red('✖')} ${absToRel(file)}\n${mmf.getErrorMessages().join('\n')}\n${'-'.repeat(50)}`; |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let output = ''; | ||
| output += `Warnings: ${chalk.bold[this.warnings.length ? 'yellowBright' : 'green'](this.warnings.length)}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the usage of Chalk methods for styling
The current syntax for styling the warning count uses array notation, which is not the standard usage of the Chalk library. Chalk methods should be chained to apply multiple styles.
Instead of using chalk.bold[style](text), you should chain the methods like chalk.bold.style(text).
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- output += `Warnings: ${chalk.bold[this.warnings.length ? 'yellowBright' : 'green'](this.warnings.length)}`;
+ output += `Warnings: ${this.warnings.length ? chalk.bold.yellowBright(this.warnings.length) : chalk.bold.green(this.warnings.length)}`;This ensures the correct styling is applied to the warning count.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| output += `Warnings: ${chalk.bold[this.warnings.length ? 'yellowBright' : 'green'](this.warnings.length)}`; | |
| output += `Warnings: ${this.warnings.length ? chalk.bold.yellowBright(this.warnings.length) : chalk.bold.green(this.warnings.length)}`; |
| let {signal} = controller; | ||
| this.controllers.set(file, controller); | ||
|
|
||
| let {stderr} = await promisify(exec)(`${mocPath} --check ${deps.join(' ')} ${file}`, {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prevent shell injection by using execFile instead of exec
Constructing shell commands by concatenating variables can introduce security risks due to shell injection vulnerabilities. Using execFile allows you to pass command arguments as an array, mitigating this risk.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
- let {stderr} = await promisify(exec)(\`${mocPath} --check \${deps.join(' ')} \${file}\`, {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {
+ import {execFile} from 'node:child_process';
+
+ let args = ['--check', ...deps, file];
+ let {stderr} = await promisify(execFile)(mocPath, args, {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {This refactors the code to use execFile, passing the command and its arguments separately, which enhances security by avoiding shell interpretation of the command string.
Don't forget to adjust the import statement at the top of the file:
- import {exec} from 'node:child_process';
+ import {execFile} from 'node:child_process';Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts
Outdated
| await promisify(exec)(`dfx canister create ${canister}`, {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => { | ||
| if (error.code === 'ABORT_ERR') { | ||
| return {stderr: ''}; | ||
| } | ||
| throw error; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sanitize shell command inputs to prevent command injection vulnerabilities.
Interpolating variables directly into shell commands can expose the application to command injection attacks if the variables contain malicious input. Ensure that the canister variable is properly validated or use safer methods to execute commands.
Consider using execFile to pass command arguments as an array, which avoids shell interpretation:
For the dfx canister create command:
- await promisify(exec)(`dfx canister create ${canister}`, {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {
+ await promisify(execFile)('dfx', ['canister', 'create', canister], {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {For the dfx build command:
- await promisify(exec)(`dfx build ${canister}`, {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {
+ await promisify(execFile)('dfx', ['build', canister], {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {For the dfx canister install command:
- await promisify(exec)(`dfx canister install --mode=auto ${canister}`, {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {
+ await promisify(execFile)('dfx', ['canister', 'install', '--mode=auto', canister], {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => {Also applies to: 107-113, 116-121
|
|
||
| // create canisters (sequentially to avoid DFX errors) | ||
| let resolve : (() => void) | undefined; | ||
| this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => resolve = res); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid assignment within expressions for improved clarity.
Assigning a variable within an expression can make the code less readable and harder to maintain. It's recommended to perform assignments outside of expressions.
Apply this diff to make the assignment explicit:
- this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => resolve = res);
+ this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => {
+ resolve = res;
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => resolve = res); | |
| this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => { | |
| resolve = res; | |
| }); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
| if (signal?.aborted) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure child processes are terminated when signal is aborted
While checking signal?.aborted and returning early prevents further code execution, any spawned child processes (e.g., buildProc, proc) will continue to run in the background. This could lead to unwanted resource consumption or conflicts.
To address this, consider adding an event listener to the signal that terminates any running child processes when the signal is aborted. Here's how you might modify the code:
// Example for handling buildProc in Wasi mode
let buildProc = spawn(mocPath, [`-o=${wasmFile}`, '-wasi-system-api', ...mocArgs]);
+ if (signal) {
+ signal.addEventListener('abort', () => {
+ buildProc.kill();
+ });
+ }
pipeMMF(buildProc, mmf).then(async () => {
// existing code...Repeat similar logic for other child processes like proc in the interpreter and replica modes. This ensures that all subprocesses are properly terminated when an abort signal is received.
Also applies to: 289-291, 309-311, 330-332
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cli/commands/sources.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-48: Consider improving error handling and code structureWhile the function works as intended, there are a few areas where it could be improved:
Error Handling: The function uses several file system operations (e.g.,
fs.existsSync) without explicit error handling. Consider wrapping these in try-catch blocks to gracefully handle potential errors.Code Structure: The function is quite long and handles multiple concerns. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions for better maintainability. For example, you could create separate functions for handling different dependency types.
Async/Sync Mix: The function mixes synchronous and asynchronous operations. Consider using async versions of file system operations (like
fs.promises.accessinstead offs.existsSync) for consistency and to potentially improve performance.Here's a sketch of how you might refactor this:
import { promises as fs } from 'node:fs'; async function handleLocalDependency(name: string, version: string, cwd: string) { // ... logic for local dependencies } async function handleGithubDependency(name: string, version: string, cwd: string) { // ... logic for GitHub dependencies } async function handleMopsDependency(name: string, version: string, cwd: string) { // ... logic for mops dependencies } export async function sources({conflicts = 'ignore' as 'warning' | 'error' | 'ignore', cwd = process.cwd()} = {}) { if (!await checkConfigFile()) { return []; } let resolvedPackages = await resolvePackages({conflicts}); const results = await Promise.all(Object.entries(resolvedPackages).map(async ([name, version]) => { const depType = getDependencyType(version); try { switch(depType) { case 'local': return await handleLocalDependency(name, version, cwd); case 'github': return await handleGithubDependency(name, version, cwd); case 'mops': return await handleMopsDependency(name, version, cwd); default: return null; } } catch (error) { console.error(`Error processing dependency ${name}: ${error.message}`); return null; } })); return results.filter(x => x != null); }This refactored version separates concerns, uses async/await consistently, and includes basic error handling. You'd need to implement the individual handler functions, but this structure should be more maintainable.
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (1)
30-34: Consider resetting all relevant properties in theresetmethod.The
resetmethod reinitializes some of the deployment state properties. However, it might be beneficial to reset all relevant properties for consistency. For example, consider resetting theabortedproperty here as well.cli/cli.ts (1)
399-411: LGTM: Newwatchcommand implementation.The
watchcommand is well-structured and follows the existing pattern in the file. It provides a comprehensive set of options for Motoko development tasks.Suggestion: Consider adding a network option or check, especially for the deployment functionality (
-doption). This would ensure consistency with other network-dependent operations in the CLI.You might want to add a network-related option or check, similar to other commands that involve deployment. For example:
.option('-n, --network <network>', 'Specify the network for deployment (e.g., local, ic)')And in the action:
if (options.deploy) { const network = options.network || getNetwork(); // Use the network in the watch function }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- cli/cli.ts (4 hunks)
- cli/commands/sources.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/test/reporters/silent-reporter.ts (2 hunks)
- cli/commands/test/test.ts (5 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/error-checker.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/generator.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/warning-checker.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- cli/commands/test/test.ts
- cli/commands/watch/error-checker.ts
- cli/commands/watch/generator.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
cli/commands/sources.ts (1)
48-48: Approve: Good addition of null filteringThe addition of
.filter(x => x != null)is a good improvement. It ensures that the function only returns valid entries, increasing the robustness of the code.cli/commands/watch/warning-checker.ts (5)
1-21: LGTM: Imports and class properties are well-definedThe imports are appropriate for the functionality of the
WarningCheckerclass, and the class properties are well-defined with proper types. This provides a solid foundation for the class implementation.
23-27: LGTM: Constructor is properly implementedThe constructor correctly initializes the class properties with the provided arguments. The use of object destructuring in the parameter makes the code clean and easy to understand.
29-32: LGTM: Reset method is correctly implementedThe
resetmethod properly reinitializes thestatusto 'pending' and clears thewarningsarray. This is essential for maintaining the correct state of theWarningCheckerinstance.
34-43: LGTM: abortCurrent method is correctly implementedThe
abortCurrentmethod properly handles the abortion of all controllers and waits for the current run to complete. The previous issue regarding checking for undefinedthis.currentRunhas been addressed, asawait undefinedis a no-op in JavaScript and won't cause an error.
1-133: Overall, excellent implementation with minor adjustments neededThe
WarningCheckerclass is well-implemented and addresses most of the concerns raised in previous reviews. The code is clean, well-structured, and follows good practices. There are just two minor issues to address:
- The use of template literals in the
replacemethod in therunmethod (lines 88-89).- The incorrect use of Chalk methods in the
getOutputmethod (line 127).Once these small adjustments are made, the implementation will be fully optimized and ready for use.
Great job on this implementation!
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (7)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports cover necessary Node.js modules, third-party libraries, and custom project modules required for the
Deployerclass functionality.
11-21: LGTM: Well-defined class properties.The
Deployerclass properties are comprehensive, covering deployment status, canisters, error tracking, and control mechanisms. The use of TypeScript types enhances code clarity and type safety.
23-28: LGTM: Concise and clear constructor.The constructor efficiently initializes the
Deployerinstance using object destructuring for clean parameter handling.
36-45: LGTM: Effective abort mechanism.The
abortCurrentmethod provides a robust mechanism to cancel ongoing deployments. It properly manages theabortedflag, cancels all active controllers, and ensures the current run completes before resetting the state.
96-134: LGTM: Efficient parallel installation of canisters.The parallel installation of canisters using the number of CPU cores is an efficient approach. The consistent use of AbortController and error handling for aborted operations ensures robust control over the deployment process.
136-154: LGTM: Informative and well-formatted output.The
getOutputmethod provides clear and informative status messages with effective use of color coding. It comprehensively handles different deployment status cases, enhancing the user experience.
1-155: Overall, excellent implementation of theDeployerclass.The
Deployerclass provides a robust and comprehensive solution for managing canister deployments. It effectively handles various aspects of the deployment process, including error checking, parallel installations, and abort mechanisms. The code is well-structured, uses TypeScript types effectively, and includes informative output formatting.While there are a few minor suggestions for improvement (e.g., in the
resetmethod and DFX check), the overall implementation is of high quality and should serve its purpose well.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
cli/cli.ts (2)
29-29: LGTM: Import statement forwatchfunction.The import statement for the
watchfunction is correctly placed and follows the existing pattern in the file. It suggests a well-organized file structure for the newwatchcommand.
399-412: LGTM: Excellent integration of thewatchcommand.The new
watchcommand is well-integrated into the existing CLI structure. It follows the established patterns for command implementation, including the use ofcheckConfigFile(true). The placement at the end of the command definitions, just beforeprogram.parse(), is appropriate and consistent with the file's organization.cli/commands/test/reporters/silent-reporter.ts (4)
8-14: Class Properties Initialized AppropriatelyThe class properties are initialized with default values, enhancing code clarity and ensuring predictable behavior.
24-25:addFilesMethod Correctly Updates TotalThe
addFilesmethod properly updates thetotalproperty based on the number of files, which is essential for progress tracking.
44-44: Template Literal Constructs Output CorrectlyThe
outputstring is correctly constructed using template literals, ensuring that error messages are formatted as intended.
54-54:onProgressCallback Invoked ProperlyThe
onProgresscallback is called appropriately after each test run, which facilitates real-time progress updates.
| async run(onProgress : () => void) { | ||
| await this.abortCurrent(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (this.errorChecker.status === 'error') { | ||
| this.status = 'syntax-error'; | ||
| onProgress(); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.status = 'running'; | ||
| onProgress(); | ||
|
|
||
| let rootDir = getRootDir(); | ||
| let mocPath = getMocPath(); | ||
| let deps = await sources({cwd: rootDir}); | ||
|
|
||
| let paths = [...Object.values(this.canisters)]; | ||
| if (!paths.length) { | ||
| paths = globMoFiles(rootDir); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.currentRun = parallel(os.cpus().length, paths, async (file) => { | ||
| let controller = new AbortController(); | ||
| let {signal} = controller; | ||
| this.controllers.set(file, controller); | ||
|
|
||
| let {stderr} = await promisify(execFile)(mocPath, ['--check', ...deps.flatMap(x => x.split(' ')), file], {cwd: rootDir, signal}).catch((error) => { | ||
| if (error.code === 'ABORT_ERR') { | ||
| return {stderr: ''}; | ||
| } | ||
| throw error; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (stderr) { | ||
| stderr.split('\n').forEach((line) => { | ||
| // ignore deps warnings | ||
| if (line.startsWith('.mops/')) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| else if (line.includes(': warning [')) { | ||
| // better formatting | ||
| let str = line | ||
| .replace(': warning [', `: ${chalk.yellow('warning')} [`) | ||
| .replace(/unused field (\w+)/, `unused field ${chalk.bold('$1')}`) | ||
| .replace(/unused identifier (\w+)/, `unused identifier ${chalk.bold('$1')}`) | ||
| .trim(); | ||
| this.warnings.push(str); | ||
| } | ||
| else if (line.startsWith(' ') && this.warnings.length) { | ||
| this.warnings[this.warnings.length - 1] += '\n ' + line; | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| // console.log('UNKNOWN WARNING', line); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| onProgress(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.controllers.delete(file); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| await this.currentRun; | ||
|
|
||
| if (!this.aborted) { | ||
| this.status = this.warnings.length ? 'error' : 'success'; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| onProgress(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall implementation looks good, but there's a minor issue to address
The run method is well-implemented and covers all the necessary steps for checking warnings. The use of execFile instead of exec is a good security practice. However, there's still an issue with the use of template literals in the replace method.
On lines 88-89, the use of template literals with $1 won't work as expected. To fix this, replace these lines with:
.replace(/unused field (\w+)/, (_, p1) => `unused field ${chalk.bold(p1)}`)
.replace(/unused identifier (\w+)/, (_, p1) => `unused identifier ${chalk.bold(p1)}`)This change ensures that the captured group is correctly passed to the chalk.bold function.
| getOutput() : string { | ||
| if (this.status === 'pending') { | ||
| return `Warnings: ${chalk.gray('(pending)')}`; | ||
| } | ||
| if (this.status === 'running') { | ||
| return `Warnings: ${chalk.gray('(running)')}`; | ||
| } | ||
| if (this.status === 'syntax-error') { | ||
| return `Warnings: ${chalk.gray('(errors)')}`; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let output = ''; | ||
| output += `Warnings: ${chalk.bold[this.warnings.length ? 'yellowBright' : 'green'](this.warnings.length)}`; | ||
| if (this.verbose && this.warnings.length) { | ||
| output += `\n ${this.warnings.join('\n ')}`; | ||
| } | ||
| return output; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
getOutput method needs a minor adjustment
The getOutput method is well-structured and provides appropriate output based on the current status. However, there's still an issue with the use of Chalk methods.
On line 127, the use of array notation with Chalk is incorrect. Replace this line with:
output += `Warnings: ${this.warnings.length ? chalk.bold.yellowBright(this.warnings.length) : chalk.bold.green(this.warnings.length)}`;This change ensures that the Chalk methods are used correctly to apply the desired styling.
| async run(onProgress : () => void) { | ||
| await this.abortCurrent(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (this.errorChecker.status === 'error') { | ||
| this.status = 'syntax-error'; | ||
| onProgress(); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (Object.keys(this.canisters).length === 0) { | ||
| this.status = 'success'; | ||
| onProgress(); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let rootDir = getRootDir(); | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| execSync('dfx ping', {cwd: rootDir}); | ||
| } | ||
| catch (error) { | ||
| this.status = 'dfx-error'; | ||
| onProgress(); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an asynchronous approach for the DFX check.
The initial checks and verifications in the run method are thorough. However, the DFX check uses execSync, which could potentially block the event loop. Consider using an asynchronous approach, such as promisify(execFile), to maintain consistency with the rest of the method and avoid potential performance issues.
Example:
try {
await promisify(execFile)('dfx', ['ping'], { cwd: rootDir });
} catch (error) {
this.status = 'dfx-error';
onProgress();
return;
}| // create canisters (sequentially to avoid DFX errors) | ||
| let resolve : (() => void) | undefined; | ||
| this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => resolve = res); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid assignment within expressions for improved clarity.
The assignment within the Promise constructor can make the code less readable. Consider separating the assignment for better clarity.
Apply this diff to make the assignment explicit:
- this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => resolve = res);
+ this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => {
+ resolve = res;
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // create canisters (sequentially to avoid DFX errors) | |
| let resolve : (() => void) | undefined; | |
| this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => resolve = res); | |
| // create canisters (sequentially to avoid DFX errors) | |
| let resolve : (() => void) | undefined; | |
| this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => { | |
| resolve = res; | |
| }); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
| if (this.flushOnError) { | ||
| console.log(output); | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| this.errorOutput = `${this.errorOutput}\n${output}`.trim(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor Error Output Accumulation for Efficiency
Accumulating error messages using string concatenation may become inefficient with a large number of errors. Consider using an array to collect error messages and join them when needed.
Apply this refactor to improve performance and maintainability:
- else {
- this.errorOutput = `${this.errorOutput}\n${output}`.trim();
- }
+ else {
+ if (!this.errorOutputArray) {
+ this.errorOutputArray = [];
+ }
+ this.errorOutputArray.push(output);
+ }Then, when you need to access the accumulated error output:
getErrorOutput() {
return this.errorOutputArray.join('\n');
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
docs/docs/00-introduction.md (4)
16-20: Clear explanation of Mops as a package managerThe description effectively communicates Mops' role as a package manager for Motoko. The examples of adding and updating dependencies are concise and demonstrate the simplicity of using Mops.
To further enhance this section, consider adding a brief explanation of what a package manager does for those who might be new to the concept. For example:
Mops simplifies dependency management for your Motoko projects. You can easily: - Add dependencies: `mops add <package>` - Update dependencies: `mops update <package>`This addition would provide context for newcomers while maintaining the section's brevity.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~16-~16: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...ick-start). ## What is Mops? ### Mops is a package manager for Motoko Add depen...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
22-27: Informative section on Mops as an on-chain package registryThis section effectively highlights a unique feature of Mops - its on-chain package registry. The information about packages being hosted on the Internet Computer blockchain adds credibility and may be of interest to developers concerned about package availability and persistence.
However, there's a small typo in the heading:
- ### Mops is on on-chain package registry for Motoko + ### Mops is an on-chain package registry for MotokoThe link to mops.one is a valuable addition, allowing users to easily discover available Motoko packages.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~22-~22: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...y asmops update <package>. ### Mops is on on-chain package registry for Motoko...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...mops update `. ### Mops is on on-chain package registry for Motoko All ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
36-38: Informative section on Mops as a toolchain managerThis section effectively introduces another key functionality of Mops - its role as a toolchain manager. The mention of specific tools (
moc,pocket-ic, andwasmtime) provides concrete examples of what Mops can manage, which is helpful for users.To enhance this section further, consider adding a brief explanation of why toolchain management is important. For example:
### Mops is a toolchain manager for Motoko [`mops toolchain`](/cli/toolchain) helps you install and manage the Motoko toolchain, ensuring you always have the right versions of essential tools like `moc`, `pocket-ic`, and `wasmtime`. This simplifies setup and helps maintain consistency across your development environment.This addition would provide context for the importance of toolchain management, especially for those new to Motoko development.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~36-~36: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ... package](https://mops.one/bench). ### Mops is a toolchain manager for Motoko [`mo...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[grammar] ~36-~36: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...age](https://mops.one/bench). ### Mops is a toolchain manager for Motoko [`mops ...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
40-42: Strong conclusion highlighting Mops' essential natureThis section effectively positions Mops as an indispensable tool for Motoko developers. The description of the
mops watchcommand succinctly captures its wide-ranging capabilities, from syntax checking to canister deployment.To make this section even more impactful, consider restructuring it slightly:
### Mops streamlines your Motoko development workflow The [`mops watch`](/cli/mops-watch) command is a powerful feature that: - Checks for syntax errors - Shows warnings - Runs tests - Generates declarations - Deploys canisters All of this happens automatically each time you make changes to your code, significantly speeding up your development process.This restructuring emphasizes the automation aspect and clearly lists out the benefits, making it easier for readers to grasp the value of using Mops in their development workflow.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~40-~40: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...,pocket-icandwasmtime. ### Mops is an essential tool for Motoko developers...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
docs/docs/cli/4-dev/01-mops-watch.md (3)
11-13: Add language specifier to the code blockTo improve syntax highlighting and adhere to Markdown best practices, please add a language specifier to the code block. For shell commands, you can use
bashorsh.-``` +```bash mops watch<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 11-11: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `22-64`: **Add language specifiers to all code blocks in the Options section** To improve syntax highlighting and consistency throughout the document, please add language specifiers to all code blocks in the Options section. For shell commands, you can use `bash` or `sh`. Apply this change to all code blocks in the Options section: ```diff -``` +```bash mops watch [option]<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 30-30: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 38-38: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 46-46: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 54-54: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 62-62: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `66-88`: **Add language specifiers to all code blocks in the Examples section** To maintain consistency with the previous sections and improve syntax highlighting, please add language specifiers to all code blocks in the Examples section. For shell commands, use `bash` or `sh`. Apply this change to all code blocks in the Examples section: ```diff -``` +```bash mops watch [options]<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 70-70: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 76-76: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 82-82: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 86-86: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>cli/commands/watch/parseDfxJson.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `1-42`: **LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.** The import statements and the `DfxConfig` type definition are well-structured and comprehensive. The type accurately represents the structure of a `dfx.json` file, including optional properties where appropriate. Consider adding JSDoc comments to the `DfxConfig` type and its properties for better documentation. This will improve code readability and provide better IDE support. For example: ```typescript /** * Represents the structure of a dfx.json configuration file. */ type DfxConfig = { /** The schema URL for the configuration file */ $schema: string; /** The version of the configuration format */ version: number; /** Canister configurations */ canisters: { [key: string]: { /** The type of the canister */ type: 'motoko' | 'assets'; /** The main entry point for the canister */ main?: string; // ... (add comments for other properties) }; }; // ... (add comments for other top-level properties) };
52-64: LGTM! Consider consistent naming and preparing for async operations.The
getMotokoCanistersandgetMotokoCanistersWithDeclarationsfunctions are well-implemented, using functional programming concepts effectively. They correctly handle undefinedmainproperties and provide a clear interface for retrieving Motoko canister information.Consider the following minor improvements:
Consistent naming: The variable
dfxJsoncould be renamed todfxConfigfor consistency with the type nameDfxConfig.Prepare for async: If
readDfxJsonis updated to be asynchronous as suggested earlier, these functions should also become async. Here's how you might structure them:export async function getMotokoCanisters(): Promise<Record<string, string>> { const dfxConfig = await readDfxJson(); return Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(dfxConfig.canisters) .filter(([_, canister]) => canister.type === 'motoko') .map(([name, canister]) => [name, canister.main ?? ''])); } export async function getMotokoCanistersWithDeclarations(): Promise<Record<string, string>> { const dfxConfig = await readDfxJson(); return Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(dfxConfig.canisters) .filter(([_, canister]) => canister.type === 'motoko' && canister.declarations) .map(([name, canister]) => [name, canister.main ?? ''])); }These changes will make the code more consistent and future-proof if asynchronous operations are introduced.
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (2)
136-154: LGTM: Informative output method with good use of color.The
getOutputmethod provides clear and informative status messages for different deployment states. The use ofchalkfor colored output enhances console readability.Minor suggestion: Consider simplifying the ternary operator in the
countvariable assignment for improved readability. For example:let count = this.status === 'running' ? get(this.errors.length || this.success) : chalk.bold[this.errors.length > 0 ? 'redBright' : 'green'](this.errors.length || this.success);
78-78: Improve readability by avoiding assignment within expressions.To enhance code clarity and maintainability, it's recommended to perform assignments outside of expressions. Consider refactoring this line as follows:
- this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => resolve = res); + this.currentRun = new Promise<void>((res) => { + resolve = res; + });This change makes the assignment more explicit and easier to understand.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
cli/commands/replica.ts (1)
155-158: Consider refactoring repeated abort checksThe checks for
if (signal?.aborted) { return; }are repeated multiple times after asynchronous operations. To improve code maintainability and adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider refactoring these checks into a helper function or integrating the abort logic within your customspawnAsyncfunction.For example, you could modify the
spawnAsyncfunction to handle aborts internally:function spawnAsync(command: string, args: string[], options: SpawnOptions & {signal?: AbortSignal}): Promise<{ stdout: string; stderr: string; }> { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { if (options.signal?.aborted) { return resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '' }); } // ... rest of the implementation }); }Alternatively, create a helper method:
private isAborted(signal?: AbortSignal): boolean { return signal?.aborted ?? false; } // Usage: if (this.isAborted(signal)) { return; }Also applies to: 166-168, 194-197, 200-203
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cli/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- cli/commands/replica.ts (4 hunks)
- cli/commands/test/test.ts (10 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/parseDfxJson.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/watch/watch.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/package.json (1 hunks)
- dfx.json (2 hunks)
- dfx.schema.json (1 hunks)
- docs/docs/00-introduction.md (1 hunks)
- docs/docs/cli/4-dev/01-mops-watch.md (1 hunks)
- docs/docs/cli/4-dev/category.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/docs/cli/4-dev/category.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- cli/commands/test/test.ts
- cli/commands/watch/watch.ts
- dfx.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/docs/00-introduction.md
[grammar] ~16-~16: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...ick-start). ## What is Mops? ### Mops is a package manager for Motoko Add depen...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[grammar] ~22-~22: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...y asmops update <package>. ### Mops is on on-chain package registry for Motoko...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...mops update `. ### Mops is on on-chain package registry for Motoko All ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~28-~28: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...mops.one](https://mops.one/). ### Mops is a test runner for Motoko Mops comes wi...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[style] ~32-~32: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...` package](https://mops.one/test). ### Mops is a benchmarking tool for Motoko Mops...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[grammar] ~32-~32: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...kage](https://mops.one/test). ### Mops is a benchmarking tool for Motoko Mops co...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[style] ~36-~36: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ... package](https://mops.one/bench). ### Mops is a toolchain manager for Motoko [`mo...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[grammar] ~36-~36: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...age](https://mops.one/bench). ### Mops is a toolchain manager for Motoko [`mops ...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[grammar] ~40-~40: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...,pocket-icandwasmtime. ### Mops is an essential tool for Motoko developers...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/docs/cli/4-dev/01-mops-watch.md
11-11: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
30-30: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
46-46: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
54-54: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
62-62: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
70-70: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
76-76: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
82-82: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
86-86: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
docs/docs/00-introduction.md (3)
8-12: Excellent introduction to Mops!The new introduction effectively communicates Mops' purpose and value proposition. It succinctly presents Mops as a comprehensive solution for Motoko development, emphasizing its role in empowering and simplifying the developer experience. This sets a clear expectation for readers and encourages them to explore further.
28-34: Well-structured sections on test runner and benchmarking toolThese sections effectively communicate additional functionalities of Mops beyond package management. The information about the test runner and benchmarking tool is clear and concise. The mentions of compatibility with specific packages (
testandbench) and adherence to the Mops Message Format provide valuable context for users.The inclusion of links to the CLI documentation for both the test runner and benchmarking tool is particularly helpful, allowing users to easily access more detailed information if needed.
These additions contribute to presenting Mops as a comprehensive tool for Motoko development.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~28-~28: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...mops.one](https://mops.one/). ### Mops is a test runner for Motoko Mops comes wi...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[style] ~32-~32: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...` package](https://mops.one/test). ### Mops is a benchmarking tool for Motoko Mops...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[grammar] ~32-~32: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...kage](https://mops.one/test). ### Mops is a benchmarking tool for Motoko Mops co...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
Line range hint
1-42: Excellent improvements to the Mops introduction documentationThe changes made to this file significantly enhance the quality and comprehensiveness of the Mops introduction. The document now provides a clear, well-structured overview of Mops' capabilities, positioning it as a comprehensive solution for Motoko development.
Key improvements include:
- A more impactful introduction that clearly states Mops' purpose and value proposition.
- Well-defined sections that highlight various functionalities of Mops (package manager, on-chain registry, test runner, benchmarking tool, and toolchain manager).
- Practical examples and links to further documentation, enhancing usability.
- A strong conclusion that emphasizes Mops' role in streamlining the development workflow.
These changes will greatly assist both new and experienced Motoko developers in understanding the benefits and capabilities of Mops. The minor suggestions provided in the review comments can further refine this already excellent documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~16-~16: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...ick-start). ## What is Mops? ### Mops is a package manager for Motoko Add depen...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[grammar] ~22-~22: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...y asmops update <package>. ### Mops is on on-chain package registry for Motoko...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...mops update `. ### Mops is on on-chain package registry for Motoko All ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~28-~28: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...mops.one](https://mops.one/). ### Mops is a test runner for Motoko Mops comes wi...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[style] ~32-~32: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...` package](https://mops.one/test). ### Mops is a benchmarking tool for Motoko Mops...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[grammar] ~32-~32: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...kage](https://mops.one/test). ### Mops is a benchmarking tool for Motoko Mops co...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[style] ~36-~36: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ... package](https://mops.one/bench). ### Mops is a toolchain manager for Motoko [`mo...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[grammar] ~36-~36: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...age](https://mops.one/bench). ### Mops is a toolchain manager for Motoko [`mops ...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
[grammar] ~40-~40: Did you mean “are” or “were”?
Context: ...,pocket-icandwasmtime. ### Mops is an essential tool for Motoko developers...(SENT_START_NNS_IS)
docs/docs/cli/4-dev/01-mops-watch.md (1)
1-88: Overall document structure and content look goodThe document provides a comprehensive and well-structured overview of the
mops watchcommand. The content is informative, easy to follow, and covers all necessary aspects of the command's usage.Great job on creating this documentation! Once the minor formatting suggestions are implemented, this will be an excellent resource for users of the
mops watchcommand.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
11-11: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
30-30: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
46-46: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
54-54: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
62-62: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
70-70: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
76-76: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
82-82: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
86-86: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
cli/package.json (1)
96-96: LGTM! Consider verifying Node.js compatibility.Updating
@types/nodefrom 22.5.4 to 22.7.4 is a good practice to keep dependencies current. This minor version update likely introduces new features or non-breaking changes.Please ensure this update is compatible with the project's Node.js version. You can verify this by checking the
enginesfield in thepackage.jsonfile.Would you like me to fetch and summarize the changelog for
@types/nodebetween versions 22.5.4 and 22.7.4 to check for any significant changes?✅ Verification successful
@types/node Update Verified
Updating
@types/nodefrom 22.5.4 to 22.7.4 is compatible with the project's Node.js requirement of >=18.0.0. No compatibility issues detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the required Node.js version and compare it with the updated @types/node version. # Get the required Node.js version required_node_version=$(jq -r '.engines.node' cli/package.json) echo "Required Node.js version: $required_node_version" echo "Updated @types/node version: 22.7.4" # Note: Further compatibility checks might require manual review of the @types/node changelog.Length of output: 234
cli/commands/watch/deployer.ts (6)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports cover necessary Node.js built-ins, external libraries, and local modules required for the
Deployerclass functionality. The use ofchalkfor colored console output is a good practice for CLI tools.
11-21: LGTM: Well-structured class definition with comprehensive properties.The
Deployerclass is well-defined with properties covering various aspects of deployment management. The use of TypeScript for type definitions and union types for status enhances code clarity and maintainability.
23-28: LGTM: Clear and concise constructor.The constructor is well-implemented, using object destructuring for clear parameter passing and properly initializing all necessary properties of the class.
30-34: LGTM: Effective reset method.The
resetmethod efficiently reinitializes the deployment state, which is crucial for managing the deployment lifecycle.
36-45: LGTM: Well-implemented abort functionality.The
abortCurrentmethod effectively usesAbortControllerto cancel ongoing processes, ensures completion of current operations, and properly resets the state. This is a robust implementation for handling deployment cancellation.
47-134: LGTM: Comprehensive and well-structured run method.The
runmethod effectively orchestrates the deployment process, including error checking, sequential canister creation, and parallel installation. The use ofpromisify(execFile)for executing commands is a safe practice. The method handles various scenarios and provides good error handling and progress updates.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 78-78: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
dfx.schema.json (1)
1-1228: Overall, the dfx.schema.json is well-structured but has room for improvementThe dfx.schema.json file provides a comprehensive and detailed schema for configuring the DFX environment. It covers a wide range of options and is generally well-organized. However, there are several areas where it could be improved:
- Consistency in nullability: Some properties allow null values where it might not be necessary or desirable (e.g., "dfx" and "version" properties).
- Deprecated definitions: The ConfigDefaultsBootstrap definition is marked as removed but is still present in the schema.
- Default values: Some default values, like the log level for ConfigDefaultsCanisterHttp, might benefit from reconsideration.
- Structural simplification: The TechStack definition could be simplified to reduce redundancy.
Addressing these points would enhance the clarity, consistency, and maintainability of the schema. Consider reviewing and updating these areas to improve the overall quality of the configuration schema.
cli/commands/replica.ts (2)
149-153: Review error handling for aborted processesIn the catch blocks at lines 149-153 and 160-164, the code checks for
error.code === 'ABORT_ERR'to handle aborted operations. However, when a process is terminated due to an abort signal, the error may not have a code of'ABORT_ERR'. Instead, the error is typically an instance ofAbortErroror may not include thecodeproperty.Please verify that the error handling correctly detects when an operation has been aborted. You may need to adjust the condition to check
error.name === 'AbortError'or useerror instanceof AbortError.Also applies to: 160-164
130-130: Method signature update is appropriateThe addition of the optional
signalparameter to thedeploymethod enhances the ability to abort deployments gracefully. The method remains backward-compatible due to the parameter being optional.
| function readDfxJson() : DfxConfig | Record<string, never> { | ||
| let dfxJsonPath = path.resolve(getRootDir(), 'dfx.json'); | ||
| if (!existsSync(dfxJsonPath)) { | ||
| return {}; | ||
| } | ||
| return JSON.parse(readFileSync(dfxJsonPath, 'utf8')) as DfxConfig; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving error handling and using asynchronous file reading.
The readDfxJson function is well-structured, but there are a few areas for improvement:
-
Error Handling: The function doesn't handle JSON parsing errors. Consider wrapping the
JSON.parsecall in a try-catch block to handle potential parsing errors gracefully. -
Asynchronous Operation: For better performance, especially with larger files or in high-concurrency scenarios, consider using asynchronous file reading.
Here's a suggested implementation that addresses these points:
import { promises as fs } from 'node:fs';
async function readDfxJson(): Promise<DfxConfig | Record<string, never>> {
const dfxJsonPath = path.resolve(getRootDir(), 'dfx.json');
try {
const data = await fs.readFile(dfxJsonPath, 'utf8');
return JSON.parse(data) as DfxConfig;
} catch (error) {
if (error.code === 'ENOENT') {
return {};
}
console.error(`Error reading dfx.json: ${error.message}`);
throw error;
}
}This implementation uses asynchronous file reading, handles both file not found and JSON parsing errors, and provides more informative error logging.
| try { | ||
| execSync('dfx ping', {cwd: rootDir}); | ||
| } | ||
| catch (error) { | ||
| this.status = 'dfx-error'; | ||
| onProgress(); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an asynchronous approach for the DFX check.
The current implementation uses execSync for the DFX check, which could potentially block the event loop. Consider using an asynchronous approach to maintain consistency with the rest of the method and avoid potential performance issues.
Example:
try {
await promisify(execFile)('dfx', ['ping'], { cwd: rootDir });
} catch (error) {
this.status = 'dfx-error';
onProgress();
return;
}| "ConfigDefaultsBootstrap": { | ||
| "title": "Bootstrap Server Configuration", | ||
| "description": "The bootstrap command has been removed. All of these fields are ignored.", | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "ip": { | ||
| "description": "Specifies the IP address that the bootstrap server listens on. Defaults to 127.0.0.1.", | ||
| "default": "127.0.0.1", | ||
| "type": "string", | ||
| "format": "ip" | ||
| }, | ||
| "port": { | ||
| "description": "Specifies the port number that the bootstrap server listens on. Defaults to 8081.", | ||
| "default": 8081, | ||
| "type": "integer", | ||
| "format": "uint16", | ||
| "minimum": 0.0 | ||
| }, | ||
| "timeout": { | ||
| "description": "Specifies the maximum number of seconds that the bootstrap server will wait for upstream requests to complete. Defaults to 30.", | ||
| "default": 30, | ||
| "type": "integer", | ||
| "format": "uint64", | ||
| "minimum": 0.0 | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove deprecated ConfigDefaultsBootstrap definition
The ConfigDefaultsBootstrap definition is marked as removed in the description, but it's still present in the schema. This can lead to confusion for users. Consider removing this entire definition if it's no longer used.
Remove the entire ConfigDefaultsBootstrap definition (lines 662-688) if it's no longer in use.
| "TechStack": { | ||
| "title": "Tech Stack", | ||
| "description": "The tech stack used to build a canister.", | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "cdk": { | ||
| "title": "cdk", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "object", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ], | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "language": { | ||
| "title": "language", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "object", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ], | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "lib": { | ||
| "title": "lib", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "object", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ], | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "other": { | ||
| "title": "other", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "object", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ], | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "tool": { | ||
| "title": "tool", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "object", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ], | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the TechStack definition structure
The TechStack definition uses a repetitive structure for its properties (cdk, language, lib, other, tool). This could be simplified by defining a common schema for these properties and reusing it.
Consider refactoring the TechStack definition as follows:
"TechStack": {
"title": "Tech Stack",
"description": "The tech stack used to build a canister.",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"cdk": { "$ref": "#/definitions/TechStackComponent" },
"language": { "$ref": "#/definitions/TechStackComponent" },
"lib": { "$ref": "#/definitions/TechStackComponent" },
"other": { "$ref": "#/definitions/TechStackComponent" },
"tool": { "$ref": "#/definitions/TechStackComponent" }
}
},
"TechStackComponent": {
"type": ["object", "null"],
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}This approach reduces redundancy and makes the schema more maintainable.
| "dfx": { | ||
| "title": "dfx version", | ||
| "description": "Pins the dfx version for this project.", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "string", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing null as a valid type for the "dfx" property
The "dfx" property, which specifies the DFX version for the project, currently allows null values. This might lead to ambiguity in version specification. Consider making this a required string field to ensure that a valid DFX version is always specified.
"dfx": {
"title": "dfx version",
"description": "Pins the dfx version for this project.",
"type": [
- "string",
- "null"
+ "string"
]
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "dfx": { | |
| "title": "dfx version", | |
| "description": "Pins the dfx version for this project.", | |
| "type": [ | |
| "string", | |
| "null" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "dfx": { | |
| "title": "dfx version", | |
| "description": "Pins the dfx version for this project.", | |
| "type": [ | |
| "string" | |
| ] | |
| }, |
| "title": "Logging Level", | ||
| "description": "The logging level of the adapter.", | ||
| "default": "error", | ||
| "allOf": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "$ref": "#/definitions/HttpAdapterLogLevel" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider the default log level for ConfigDefaultsCanisterHttp
The default log level for the HTTP Adapter is set to "error". This might be too restrictive for debugging purposes, especially during development. Consider setting a more verbose default log level, such as "info", to provide more useful information by default.
"log_level": {
"title": "Logging Level",
"description": "The logging level of the adapter.",
- "default": "error",
+ "default": "info",
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/HttpAdapterLogLevel"
}
]
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "title": "Logging Level", | |
| "description": "The logging level of the adapter.", | |
| "default": "error", | |
| "allOf": [ | |
| { | |
| "$ref": "#/definitions/HttpAdapterLogLevel" | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| "title": "Logging Level", | |
| "description": "The logging level of the adapter.", | |
| "default": "info", | |
| "allOf": [ | |
| { | |
| "$ref": "#/definitions/HttpAdapterLogLevel" | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| } |
| "visibility": { | ||
| "title": "Visibility", | ||
| "default": "public", | ||
| "allOf": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "$ref": "#/definitions/MetadataVisibility" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the "visibility" property definition in CanisterMetadataSection
The "visibility" property in CanisterMetadataSection uses an "allOf" construct with a single reference, which is unnecessarily complex. This can be simplified to directly reference the MetadataVisibility definition.
"visibility": {
"title": "Visibility",
"default": "public",
- "allOf": [
- {
- "$ref": "#/definitions/MetadataVisibility"
- }
- ]
+ "$ref": "#/definitions/MetadataVisibility"
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "visibility": { | |
| "title": "Visibility", | |
| "default": "public", | |
| "allOf": [ | |
| { | |
| "$ref": "#/definitions/MetadataVisibility" | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| "visibility": { | |
| "title": "Visibility", | |
| "default": "public", | |
| "$ref": "#/definitions/MetadataVisibility" | |
| } |
| "version": { | ||
| "description": "Used to keep track of dfx.json versions.", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "integer", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ], | ||
| "format": "uint32", | ||
| "minimum": 0.0 | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider the type and nullability of the "version" property
The "version" property, used to track dfx.json versions, is currently defined as a nullable uint32. This has two potential issues:
- Allowing null might lead to ambiguity in version tracking.
- Using uint32 might be limiting for future use, especially if you need to support semantic versioning.
Consider making this a required field and using a string type to allow for more flexible versioning schemes.
"version": {
"description": "Used to keep track of dfx.json versions.",
"type": [
- "integer",
- "null"
+ "string"
],
- "format": "uint32",
- "minimum": 0.0
+ "pattern": "^[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+$"
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "version": { | |
| "description": "Used to keep track of dfx.json versions.", | |
| "type": [ | |
| "integer", | |
| "null" | |
| ], | |
| "format": "uint32", | |
| "minimum": 0.0 | |
| } | |
| "version": { | |
| "description": "Used to keep track of dfx.json versions.", | |
| "type": [ | |
| "string" | |
| ], | |
| "pattern": "^[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+$" | |
| } |
| "bindings": { | ||
| "title": "Languages to generate", | ||
| "description": "A list of languages to generate type declarations. Supported options are 'js', 'ts', 'did', 'mo'. Default is ['js', 'ts', 'did'].", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "array", | ||
| "null" | ||
| ], | ||
| "items": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider allowing null for the "bindings" property in CanisterDeclarationsConfig
The "bindings" property in CanisterDeclarationsConfig allows null values. This might lead to ambiguity in configuration. Consider making this an empty array by default instead of allowing null.
"bindings": {
"title": "Languages to generate",
"description": "A list of languages to generate type declarations. Supported options are 'js', 'ts', 'did', 'mo'. Default is ['js', 'ts', 'did'].",
"type": [
- "array",
- "null"
+ "array"
],
+ "default": ["js", "ts", "did"],
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "bindings": { | |
| "title": "Languages to generate", | |
| "description": "A list of languages to generate type declarations. Supported options are 'js', 'ts', 'did', 'mo'. Default is ['js', 'ts', 'did'].", | |
| "type": [ | |
| "array", | |
| "null" | |
| ], | |
| "items": { | |
| "type": "string" | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "bindings": { | |
| "title": "Languages to generate", | |
| "description": "A list of languages to generate type declarations. Supported options are 'js', 'ts', 'did', 'mo'. Default is ['js', 'ts', 'did'].", | |
| "type": [ | |
| "array" | |
| ], | |
| "default": ["js", "ts", "did"], | |
| "items": { | |
| "type": "string" | |
| } | |
| }, |
cli/commands/replica.ts
Outdated
| @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import {ChildProcessWithoutNullStreams, execSync, spawn} from 'node:child_proces | |||
| import path from 'node:path'; | |||
| import fs from 'node:fs'; | |||
| import {PassThrough} from 'node:stream'; | |||
| import {promisify} from 'node:util'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect usage of promisify with spawn function
The child_process.spawn function does not follow the standard Node.js callback style and returns a ChildProcess instance, not a function that accepts a callback. Therefore, using promisify on spawn will not work as expected. This issue affects the import at line 6 and the usages at lines 148-154 and 159-165. Instead, consider creating a custom Promise-based wrapper around spawn to handle asynchronous execution and error handling properly.
To fix this, remove the import of promisify and implement a custom helper function:
-import {promisify} from 'node:util';
...
+import {SpawnOptions} from 'node:child_process';
+function spawnAsync(command: string, args: string[], options: SpawnOptions & {signal?: AbortSignal}): Promise<{ stdout: string; stderr: string; }> {
+ return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+ const child = spawn(command, args, options);
+ let stdout = '';
+ let stderr = '';
+ if (child.stdout) {
+ child.stdout.on('data', (data) => {
+ stdout += data.toString();
+ });
+ }
+ if (child.stderr) {
+ child.stderr.on('data', (data) => {
+ stderr += data.toString();
+ });
+ }
+ child.on('close', (code) => {
+ if (code === 0) {
+ resolve({ stdout, stderr });
+ } else {
+ const error = new Error(`Command failed with exit code ${code}: ${stderr}`);
+ (error as any).code = code;
+ reject(error);
+ }
+ });
+ child.on('error', (error) => {
+ reject(error);
+ });
+ if (options.signal) {
+ options.signal.addEventListener('abort', () => {
+ child.kill();
+ });
+ }
+ });
+}
...
- await promisify(spawn)('dfx', ['deploy', name, '--mode', 'reinstall', '--yes', '--identity', 'anonymous'], {cwd: this.dir, signal, stdio: this.verbose ? 'pipe' : ['pipe', 'ignore', 'pipe']}).catch((error) => {
+ await spawnAsync('dfx', ['deploy', name, '--mode', 'reinstall', '--yes', '--identity', 'anonymous'], {cwd: this.dir, signal, stdio: this.verbose ? 'pipe' : ['pipe', 'ignore', 'pipe']}).catch((error) => {
if (error.code === 'ABORT_ERR') {
return {stderr: ''};
}
throw error;
});
...
- await promisify(spawn)('dfx', ['ledger', 'fabricate-cycles', '--canister', name, '--t', '100'], {cwd: this.dir, signal, stdio: this.verbose ? 'pipe' : ['pipe', 'ignore', 'pipe']}).catch((error) => {
+ await spawnAsync('dfx', ['ledger', 'fabricate-cycles', '--canister', name, '--t', '100'], {cwd: this.dir, signal, stdio: this.verbose ? 'pipe' : ['pipe', 'ignore', 'pipe']}).catch((error) => {
if (error.code === 'ABORT_ERR') {
return {stderr: ''};
}
throw error;
});Also applies to: 148-154, 159-165
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cli/commands/sync.ts (1)
53-54: Approve refactoring with a suggestion for error handlingThe refactoring of
mocPathinitialization improves code organization and maintainability. Using the importedgetMocPathfunction ensures consistency across the codebase.However, consider adding error handling for cases where
getMocPathmight fail to return a valid path. This would make the code more robust.Consider adding a check for the validity of
mocPath:let mocPath = getMocPath(); if (!mocPath) { throw new Error('Failed to get Motoko compiler path'); }Also applies to: 64-64
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- cli/check-requirements.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/bench.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/sync.ts (3 hunks)
- cli/helpers/get-moc-path.ts (1 hunks)
- cli/helpers/get-moc-version.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
cli/check-requirements.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-13: LGTM for unchanged partsThe overall structure and logic of the
checkRequirementsfunction remain sound. The function correctly handles:
- Reading the configuration
- Resolving packages
- Checking moc version requirements for each package
- Comparing installed and required versions
The error reporting in the
_checkfunction is also well-implemented, providing clear and informative output.Also applies to: 15-55
14-14: Clarify the impact of passingfalsetogetMocVersion()The change from
getMocVersion()togetMocVersion(false)might alter the behavior of how themocVersionis determined when it's not specified in the configuration.
- Could you please explain the reasoning behind this change and its expected impact?
- Consider adding a comment explaining why
falseis being passed here.- It might be helpful to update the function's documentation to reflect this new parameter.
To better understand the impact of this change, let's examine the implementation of
getMocVersion:cli/commands/sync.ts (2)
9-9: LGTM: Good refactoring ofgetMocPathThe addition of this import statement indicates a positive refactoring step. Moving
getMocPathto a separate helper file improves code organization and promotes reusability.
9-9: Summary: Positive refactoring with minor improvement suggestionThe changes in this file represent a positive step towards better code organization and reusability. The refactoring of
getMocPathinto a separate helper function and its usage ingetUsedPackagesimproves consistency and maintainability.While the changes are generally good, consider implementing the suggested error handling for
mocPathto make the code more robust against potential failures in obtaining the Motoko compiler path.Overall, these changes enhance the quality of the codebase.
Also applies to: 53-54, 64-64
cli/commands/bench.ts (1)
58-58: Clarify the purpose of the new parameter ingetMocVersion(true)The
compilerVersionis now set usinggetMocVersion(true)instead ofgetMocVersion(). This change might affect how the compiler version is retrieved for benchmarking.
- Could you please explain the purpose of the new
trueparameter?- How does this change impact the benchmarking process?
- Have you verified that this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects in the benchmark results?
To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, let's check for other usages of
getMocVersion:✅ Verification successful
<!-- [monologue] [task review_verification_2/2] [observations] - `getMocVersion(true)` in `cli/commands/bench.ts` now throws an error if the Motoko compiler version cannot be retrieved. - Other usages of `getMocVersion` in the codebase either pass `false` or rely on the default parameter, which does not throw. - The implementation of `getMocVersion` confirms that passing `true` will throw an error, enforcing the presence of the Motoko compiler for benchmarking. [analysis] - In the context of benchmarking, it's critical to ensure that the Motoko compiler is available to produce accurate results. - Throwing an error when the compiler version cannot be retrieved prevents the benchmark from running in an invalid state. - This behavior aligns with best practices for ensuring the reliability and integrity of benchmark processes. [actions] - Confirm that the change to pass `true` is intentional to enforce the presence of the Motoko compiler during benchmarking. - Ensure that this change does not negatively impact other parts of the benchmarking workflow. - Verify that appropriate error handling is in place to inform users if the compiler is missing. -->Verified: The change to use
getMocVersion(true)incli/commands/bench.tscorrectly enforces that the Motoko compiler version must be retrieved. This ensures the benchmarking process fails gracefully if the compiler is not available, maintaining the integrity of benchmark results.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of getMocVersion rg "getMocVersion\(" --type tsLength of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of getMocVersion to analyze the throwOnError parameter cat cli/helpers/get-moc-version.tsLength of output: 521
cli/helpers/get-moc-version.ts (2)
1-1: Switch toexecFileSyncenhances security and reliabilityUsing
execFileSyncinstead ofexecSyncavoids invoking a shell and reduces the risk of shell injection vulnerabilities. This change enhances the security and reliability of the function.
4-4: Addition ofthrowOnErrorparameter improves error handling flexibilityIntroducing the optional
throwOnErrorparameter allows callers to decide whether the function should throw an error or handle it silently. This enhances the flexibility of error handling based on the caller's needs.cli/helpers/get-moc-path.ts (1)
4-4: Ensure all function calls are updated to match the new signature.The
getMocPathfunction now accepts an optional parameterthrowIfNotFound. Please verify that all calls togetMocPathare updated accordingly if they require this new functionality.Run the following script to find all usages of
getMocPath:
| if (throwOnError) { | ||
| console.error(e); | ||
| throw new Error('moc not found'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include original error message in thrown error for better debugging
When re-throwing an error, consider including the original error message to provide more context for debugging.
Apply this diff to update the error handling:
console.error(e);
- throw new Error('moc not found');
+ throw new Error(`moc not found: ${e.message}`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (throwOnError) { | |
| console.error(e); | |
| throw new Error('moc not found'); | |
| } | |
| if (throwOnError) { | |
| console.error(e); | |
| throw new Error(`moc not found: ${e.message}`); | |
| } |
| try { | ||
| mocPath = execFileSync('dfx', ['cache', 'show']).toString().trim() + '/moc'; | ||
| } | ||
| catch (e) { | ||
| mocPath = ''; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure consistent error handling and logging.
The errors in the two catch blocks are handled differently—one logs the error while the other doesn't. For consistency and better debugging, consider logging errors in both catch blocks.
Either log the errors in both catch blocks or handle them consistently based on the sensitivity of the information.
Also applies to: 18-26
| catch (e) { | ||
| mocPath = ''; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider logging the error in the catch block.
When the attempt to retrieve mocPath via dfx cache show fails, the error is silently ignored. Logging the error can help with debugging.
Modify the catch block to log the error:
catch (e) {
mocPath = '';
+ console.error('Failed to get mocPath from dfx cache show:', e.message);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| catch (e) { | |
| mocPath = ''; | |
| } | |
| catch (e) { | |
| mocPath = ''; | |
| console.error('Failed to get mocPath from dfx cache show:', e.message); | |
| } |
| catch (e) { | ||
| console.error(e); | ||
| throw new Error('moc not found'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid logging raw error objects to prevent potential information leakage.
Logging the raw error with console.error(e); may expose sensitive information. Consider logging a concise, user-friendly message instead.
Update the catch block to log a more appropriate message:
catch (e) {
- console.error(e);
+ console.error('Error executing moc with --version:', e.message);
throw new Error('moc not found');
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| catch (e) { | |
| console.error(e); | |
| throw new Error('moc not found'); | |
| catch (e) { | |
| console.error('Error executing moc with --version:', e.message); | |
| throw new Error('moc not found'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cli/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-6: LGTM! Consider adding more details to bug fixes.The new entries in the changelog are well-structured and informative. The new
mops watchcommand is clearly described with a link to the documentation, which is excellent.For the bug fixes, consider adding more context or specific details:
- For the replica test hanging bug, mention the specific scenario or condition that caused it.
- For the DFX installation issue, clarify if it's now a soft dependency or if there's a graceful fallback.
These details would provide more value to users reading the changelog.
cli/commands/replica.ts (2)
6-6: Ensure 'promisify-child-process' is added to project dependencies.The import of
spawnAsyncfrom 'promisify-child-process' is correct and aligns with the asynchronous changes in thedeploymethod. However, make sure this package is added to your project's dependencies if it's not already included.Consider adding the following to your
package.jsonif not already present:"dependencies": { "promisify-child-process": "^4.1.1" }
148-168: Excellent asynchronous implementation with abort handling.The changes to use
spawnAsyncand handle potential aborts are well-implemented. This improves the responsiveness of the application and allows for graceful cancellation of the deployment process.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding more specific error handling. Instead of re-throwing the error directly, you could log it or wrap it with additional context:
} catch (error) { if (error.code === 'ABORT_ERR') { return { stderr: '' }; } console.error('Error during DFX deployment:', error); throw new Error(`DFX deployment failed: ${error.message}`); }This would provide more context in case of failures unrelated to abortion.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cli/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- cli/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- cli/commands/replica.ts (4 hunks)
- cli/package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cli/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cli/commands/replica.ts (3)
130-130: LGTM: Enhanced method signature with AbortSignal support.The addition of the optional
signalparameter of typeAbortSignalis a good practice. It allows for cancellation of the deployment process, which is particularly useful for long-running operations.
193-203: LGTM: Consistent abort handling in Pocket IC deployment.The addition of
signal?.abortedchecks after asynchronous operations in the Pocket IC deployment logic is consistent with the changes made in the DFX deployment logic. This ensures that the method can exit early if the operation is cancelled, providing a uniform cancellation mechanism across different deployment types.
6-6: Resolution of previouspromisifyusage issue.The previous review comment about incorrect usage of
promisifywith thespawnfunction has been successfully addressed. The current implementation usesspawnAsyncfrom 'promisify-child-process', which is the correct approach for handling asynchronous child processes.Also applies to: 148-165
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
watchcommand in the CLI for monitoring.mofiles, checking for syntax errors, running tests, and deploying canisters.Deployerclass for managing canister deployments with enhanced state management and error handling.ErrorChecker,Generator,Tester, andWarningCheckerclasses to streamline various operational checks during development.dfx.jsonto filter and retrieve Motoko canisters.signalparameter.mocVersionandcompilerVersion.Bug Fixes
getDefaultPackagesfunction to support the newdfxVersion"0.23.0".Documentation
mops watchcommand, detailing its functionalities and command-line options.Chores
dfx.jsonconfiguration file to reflect the new version "0.23.0".@types/nodedependency version inpackage.json.dfx.schema.jsonto validate configuration files.