setup.cfg/extras_require configuration

[abhinavsingh]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.94%. Comparing base (6602be3) to head (b08c179).
Report is 16 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1452      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    83.97%   83.94%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          180      180              
  Lines         8288     8288              
  Branches      1266     1266              
===========================================
- Hits          6960     6957       -3     
- Misses        1127     1130       +3     
  Partials       201      201              

Flag	Coverage Δ
GHA	83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
Linux	83.42% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
Python 3.10	84.44% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
Python 3.11	83.62% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️
Python 3.12	83.68% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
Python 3.6	84.39% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
Python 3.7	84.39% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
Python 3.8	84.45% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
Python 3.9	84.51% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
Windows	77.60% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️
macOS	83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
pytest	83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[webknjaz]

@abhinavsingh that's probably because you dropped the lockfiles, including the one that pinned the build env, providing reproducible builds. Those were supposed to be updated periodically so that you'd see the breakage in corresponding bump PRs.

Abusing extras as environment definitions is discouraged as it's misuse of their actual purpose. Therefore I'm waiting for the dependency groups and lockfiles PEPs that would standardize the corresponding mechanisms correctly. I see you dropped reproducibility in favor of exposing pip install proxy.py[testing] to the end-users through packaging metadata.