Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
feat: multi-plugins with extra schemas #231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: multi-plugins with extra schemas #231
Changes from 6 commits
f4b610c
50efc03
ff44b37
ec8c6b9
407e378
a19460e
f5f2329
3f3caf1
0d6dd3e
ccd5559
fe098a9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find it easier to read
Iterator[T]
instead ofGenerator[T, None, None]
and understand what the function does (we don't have to remember which argument order for the return, yield and send).Since it does not affect too much the typechecking, I tend to stick with the simpler approach. Is there a benefit in using
Generator
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a habit I have due to a problem in typing: things like
contextlib.contextmanager
takes anIterator
because people usually type these as iterators. This is incorrect, ascontextmanager
calls.close
, which is part of the Generator protocol, not the Iterator protocol. So mypy can't find a mistake like passing anIterator
instead of aGenerator
to things likecontextmanager
. The reason they gave for not fixing it was that everyone types these asIterator
. So I never type it asIterator
. :) Python 3.13 also added single argumentGenerator[T]
, largely to help with this I believe.