Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Refactor] imports to use Relation.Nullary.Irrelevant #2676

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 23, 2025

Conversation

jmougeot
Copy link
Contributor

@jmougeot jmougeot commented Mar 14, 2025

Update imports to replace references to Relation.Nullary with Relation.Nullary.Irrelevant where applicable, enhancing clarity and organization in the codebase. #2624

Copy link
Member

@Taneb Taneb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a new module, so there should be a changelog entry

@jmougeot
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmougeot commented Mar 14, 2025

I just added the changelog entry, but I’m not sure if I did it correctly.

@jamesmckinna
Copy link
Contributor

Also a good idea, for the sake of the GitHub history, to explicitly mention #2624 , which this now does over as a 'clean' PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@jamesmckinna jamesmckinna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides the nitpick, I am now convinced about the benefits of the refactoring, esp. wrt removing the imports with hiding (Irrelevant) directives.

@jmougeot jmougeot changed the title Refactor imports to use Relation.Nullary.Irrelevant [Refactor] imports to use Relation.Nullary.Irrelevant #2624 Mar 17, 2025
@jmougeot jmougeot changed the title [Refactor] imports to use Relation.Nullary.Irrelevant #2624 [Refactor] imports to use Relation.Nullary.Irrelevant Mar 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesmckinna jamesmckinna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested tweak, but optional.

Co-authored-by: jamesmckinna <[email protected]>
@jamesmckinna
Copy link
Contributor

@Taneb @JacquesCarette are either/both of you happy now? Suggest clearing this one off the docket?

@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into agda:master with commit 4871f37 Mar 23, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants