Add PR reviews best practices documentation

[dragon-ai-agent]

This document outlines how PR reviews can serve as an Archimedes lever for AI agent improvement in knowledge base curation workflows.

Key sections:

• Why PR reviews matter for AI agents
• Best practices for separation of concerns
• Review process standards
• GitHub workflow considerations
• Implementation guidelines
• Tools and automation
• Success metrics

Fixes #61

Generated with Claude Code

[claude]

Claude finished @dragon-ai-agent's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Add PR reviews best practices documentation

Review Tasks:

• Read and analyze the new documentation file
• Review mkdocs.yml changes
• Check content quality and structure
• Verify alignment with project guidelines
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Summary

This PR adds comprehensive documentation for PR review best practices specifically for AI agent workflows. The documentation is well-structured and aligns with the project's mission of providing practical, actionable guidance for AI-assisted curation.

Strengths

Content Quality

• Clear structure: Well-organized sections with logical flow from "why" to "how" to "implementation"
• Practical focus: Aligns perfectly with the repository's emphasis on actionable content over theory
• Domain-specific: Addresses unique challenges of AI agent workflows, particularly GitHub's PR ownership limitations
• Comprehensive coverage: Covers technical, process, and measurement aspects

Technical Accuracy

• Correctly identifies GitHub workflow limitations with agent-created PRs (docs/how-tos/pr-reviews-for-agent-improvement.md:70-78)
• Provides practical workarounds for review challenges
• Includes realistic examples of good vs. poor separation of concerns

Documentation Standards

• Follows established patterns from other how-to guides
• Uses consistent markdown formatting and structure
• Includes proper cross-references to related documentation

Areas for Improvement

Minor Issues

1. Reference Links (docs/how-tos/pr-reviews-for-agent-improvement.md:150-152):

   • Links to related resources may need verification
   • instruct-github-agent.md exists, but check others are valid

2. Terminology Consistency:

   • Consider using more consistent terminology for "AI agents" vs "agents"
   • Some sections could benefit from links to the glossary

Suggestions for Enhancement

1. Add Concrete Examples:

   • Consider adding a real example of a good PR review comment
   • Could include a sample review checklist template

2. GitHub Workflow Details:

   • Could expand on specific GitHub Actions integration for automated checks
   • More details on repository settings for mandatory reviews

mkdocs.yml Changes

• ✅ Properly added under "Administrator how-tos" section
• ✅ Follows existing navigation structure
• ✅ Correct file path and formatting

Security Considerations

• ✅ No security issues identified
• ✅ Documentation promotes good security practices through review requirements

Performance Considerations

• ✅ Documentation-only changes have no performance impact
• ✅ Guidance on automated pre-review checks could improve efficiency

Test Coverage

• ✅ Documentation change - no code testing required
• Consider: Could add link validation to CI in future

Final Recommendation

✅ APPROVE - This is a high-quality addition to the documentation that fills an important gap in the AI agent workflow guidance. The content is well-researched, practically focused, and aligns perfectly with the project's goals.

The minor suggestions above are enhancements for future iterations rather than blockers for this PR.

---