-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate nest asyncio #311
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…and asyncio.Future hand write wrap to kiwipy future (concurrent.futures.Future) kiwipy.Future -> concurrent.futures.Future
Move communication to rmq
The refactoring is targeting to decouple the dependencies of using kiwipy+rmq as the communicator for the process control. By forming a `Coordinator` protocol contract, the different type of rmq/kiwipy related codes are removed out from plumpy logic. The new contract also pave the way to make it clearly show how a new type coordinator can be implemented (future examples will be the `tatzelwurm` a task broker that has scheduler support and file based task broker require no background service). For the prototype of how a coordinator should look like, the `MockCoordinator` in `tests/utils` is the coordinator that store things in memory, and can serve as the lightweight ephemeral daemon without persistent functionality. Another major change here is hand write the resolver of future by mimic how tho asyncio does for wrapping `concurrent.futures.Future` into `asyncio.Future`. I use the same way to convert `asyncio.Future` into `concurent.futures.Future` (which is the `kiwipy.Future` as alias). - move the `aio_pika` import lazily by moving the rmq exceptions to `rmq` module, this can increase the performance of `import aiida; aiida.orm`. - ~~`CancellableAction` using composite to behave as a Future like object.~~ - use `asyncio.Future` in favor of alias `plumpy.Future` and - use `concurrent.futures.Future` instead of alias `kiwipy.Future`. - Hand write `_chain` and `_copy_future` since we can not just rely on the API of asyncio that is not exposed. - Forming the `coordinator/Communicator` protocol. - Just forming the `coordinator/Coordinator` protocol and wrap rmq/communicator as a coordinator that not require changs in kiwipy. - Mock the coordinator for unit test. - test against aiida-core see what need to be changed there and improve here. (aiidateam/aiida-core#6675) - The API for plumpy process can be more compact instead of using kiwipy/rmq "subscriber" concept. (how to replace rpc pattern??)
create_state refact Hashable initialized + parameters passed to Hashable Fix pre-commit errors
Notjustrmq rebase
For the auto_persist attributes, the fn auto_save will take care of save the state
Refactoring with de-abstract the save and load interfaces for all savable classes
Savable protocol test for all savable class A round trip save and load to ensure auto_persist proper store all information.
- state_machine.py - message.py - persistence.py - port.py - workchain.py - utils.py - process_spec.py - process_States.py - processes.py
Drop python 3.9
* Use yaml FullLoader that handle UUID type as well * Use UnsafeLoader explicitly for bundles * Using msgpack for passing control messages
Using the same interface for creating all message type, create/launch/continue, play/pause/kill/status It revert the message API did by using MessageBuilder, it cannot handle `MessageBuilder.continue`, it is not a good API design.
The event loop set up of coordinator and controller is from using the same event loop of a single async pytest. This maximum the decouple of tests in `tests/rmq/test_communication.py`. The fixture and the event loop scope of async test are both set to "function".
This can remove the get_event_loop deprecation warning.
fixes #20 As expected, should using the plumpy event loop. But it shows a problem that the custom event loop from tests in other places not set back to the regular event loop.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.