fixing runtime issues with verify token util

[Baalmart]

Description

fixing runtime issues with verify token util

Changes Made

• fixing runtime issues with verify token util

Testing

• Tested locally
• Tested against staging environment
• Relevant tests passed: [List test names]

Affected Services

• Which services were modified:
  • Auth Service

Endpoints Ready for Testing

• New endpoints ready for testing:
  • Verify Token

API Documentation Updated?

• Yes, API documentation was updated
• No, API documentation does not need updating

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Enhanced token verification logic to prevent potential null reference errors when checking client activation status.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor but important modification to the verifyToken method in the token utility file. The change enhances the robustness of client verification by adding an explicit null check before accessing the isActive property. This prevents potential runtime errors that could occur when attempting to check the status of an undefined client object.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/auth-service/utils/token.util.js	Updated conditional check in verifyToken method to add explicit client existence check before accessing isActive property

Possibly related PRs

• Enhancing the logging for API usage for Analytics #4285: Enhances logging for API usage in the verifyToken method
• resolving a runtime with access token verification #4287: Addresses runtime issues with access token verification
• reverting verify token changes #4290: Involves previous modifications to verifyToken functionality

Poem

🔐 Tokens dancing, safety first!
A null check here, a bug dispersed
Gentle guardian of the code's domain
Preventing errors with a careful refrain
Robustness blooms, one line at a time 🛡️

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.24%. Comparing base (46e06c7) to head (927dbb2).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4310   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.24%   11.24%           
========================================
  Files          156      156           
  Lines        17919    17919           
  Branches       388      388           
========================================
  Hits          2015     2015           
  Misses       15902    15902           
  Partials         2        2           

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/auth-service/utils/token.util.js (1)

696-697: LGTM! The null check addition improves robustness.

The explicit null check before accessing client.isActive prevents potential runtime errors while maintaining the same logical outcome. This change effectively addresses the runtime issues mentioned in the PR objectives.

However, consider consolidating the checks for better readability:

-        if (isEmpty(client) || (client && !client.isActive)) {
+        if (!client?.isActive) {

The optional chaining operator (?.) provides a more concise way to safely access nested properties, achieving the same null-safety with improved readability. Both isEmpty(client) and the explicit client && check become unnecessary since ?. handles all nullish cases.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46e06c7 and 927dbb2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/auth-service/utils/token.util.js (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

• GitHub Check: build-push-deploy-auth-service
• GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)

[github-actions]

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here