Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update metadata name(s) #4366

Conversation

NicholasTurner23
Copy link
Contributor

@NicholasTurner23 NicholasTurner23 commented Feb 5, 2025

Description

Just some clean up

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced type safety and consistency in handling device networks and sensor categories, ensuring only valid selections are processed.
    • Standardized naming conventions for sensor categories (e.g., low-cost and gaseous devices) across data extraction and cleaning workflows.
    • Improved error logging and data handling, contributing to more robust and reliable sensor data processing for end-users.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@NicholasTurner23 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1bb106 and 187e37a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/datautils.py (6 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request refactors multiple modules to standardize device network and category handling by transitioning from string values to Enum types. Function signatures in the AirQoApi and DataUtils classes now accept Enums, with internal logic updated to use the Enum’s string representation. In addition, the DeviceCategory enumeration has been renamed (LOW_COST → LOWCOST and LOW_COST_GAS replaced by GAS) and corresponding references are updated across utilities, DAGs, and helper functions. Minor enhancements in logging and file handling are also included.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_api.py Updated get_devices_by_network: changed device_network parameter type from str to DeviceNetwork and uses device_network.str for parameter handling.
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/constants.py Renamed Enum members: LOW_COSTLOWCOST and replaced LOW_COST_GAS with GAS; updated category_from_str logic accordingly.
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/datautils.py Enhanced error logging in extract_devices_data, added a debug print for the devices DataFrame, modified load_cached_data to append “.csv” to filenames, and updated _fetch_devices_from_api to use default None for parameters; refined enum usage in clean_low_cost_sensor_data.
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_utils.py,
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_warehouse_utils.py,
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/kcca_utils.py,
src/workflows/dags/airqo_measurements.py
Standardized device category usage by replacing references from DeviceCategory.LOW_COST to DeviceCategory.LOWCOST and DeviceCategory.LOW_COST_GAS to DeviceCategory.GAS across various modules.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as Client
    participant API as AirQoApi
    participant Endpoint as API Endpoint
    Client->>API: get_devices_by_network(device_network: DeviceNetwork, device_category: DeviceCategory)
    API->>API: Convert enums to their string values (.str)
    API->>Endpoint: Fetch devices with constructed parameters
    Endpoint-->>API: Return devices list
    API-->>Client: Return devices list
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Baalmart
  • BenjaminSsempala

Poem

In the realm of code where enums reign,
Device categories shift with a subtle gain.
LOW_COST becomes LOWCOST in a graceful tone,
With logging and prints, their new form is shown.
Functions dance in a structured code flight,
A refactored saga shining clear and bright.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/constants.py (1)

6-12: Update docstring to reflect the new enum names.

The docstring still references the old name LOW_COST instead of LOWCOST. Please update it to match the new enum names.

-    LOW_COST -> Reference monitors
+    LOWCOST -> Reference monitors
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec8dfea and b1bb106.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_api.py (2 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_utils.py (1 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/constants.py (2 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_warehouse_utils.py (2 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/datautils.py (6 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/kcca_utils.py (1 hunks)
  • src/workflows/dags/airqo_measurements.py (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/workflows/dags/airqo_measurements.py (1)
Learnt from: AnthonyByansi
PR: airqo-platform/AirQo-api#3262
File: src/workflows/dags/airqo_measurements.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:15:21.461Z
Learning: The dataset name `AirQodataset` was corrected to `AirQo-dataset` in multiple places within the `airqo_measurements.py` file to ensure consistency.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_warehouse_utils.py (1)

72-72: LGTM! Device category renaming is consistent.

The changes correctly update the device category from LOW_COST to LOWCOST in both locations, maintaining consistency with the enum changes.

Also applies to: 122-122

src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/constants.py (2)

14-14: LGTM! Device category enum values are consistently renamed.

The renaming from LOW_COST to LOWCOST and LOW_COST_GAS to GAS improves naming consistency while maintaining the same underlying values.

Also applies to: 16-16


52-54: LGTM! Category string comparison is updated.

The category_from_str method correctly uses the new GAS category name.

src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/kcca_utils.py (1)

135-135: LGTM! Device category is consistently updated.

The change correctly updates the device category from LOW_COST to LOWCOST in the process_latest_data method.

src/workflows/dags/airqo_measurements.py (1)

187-187: LGTM! Device categories are consistently updated across all DAGs.

The changes correctly update all device category references:

  • LOW_COST to LOWCOST in the low-cost sensor DAGs
  • LOW_COST_GAS to GAS in the gaseous sensor DAGs

The renaming maintains functionality while improving naming consistency throughout the codebase.

Also applies to: 194-194, 363-363, 370-370, 489-489, 554-554, 562-562, 613-613, 622-622

src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_utils.py (1)

159-159: LGTM! Device category name standardization.

The change from DeviceCategory.LOW_COST to DeviceCategory.LOWCOST aligns with the broader effort to standardize device category naming across the codebase.

src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/datautils.py (4)

62-62: LGTM! Improved error logging.

Enhanced error logging by including the exception message provides better debugging context.


127-127: LGTM! Explicit file extension handling.

Appending '.csv' to the file_name parameter ensures consistent file extension handling.


138-139: LGTM! Enhanced type safety with Enums.

The changes improve type safety by:

  1. Using Enum types for parameters
  2. Setting appropriate default values
  3. Correctly passing the parameters to the API call

Also applies to: 145-146


665-665: LGTM! Consistent device category naming.

Updated device category names to match the standardized naming convention:

  • LOW_COST_GASGAS
  • LOW_COSTLOWCOST

Also applies to: 669-669, 684-684

src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_api.py (1)

243-245: LGTM! Enhanced type safety and consistent Enum handling.

The changes improve the code by:

  1. Using Enum types for parameters instead of strings
  2. Consistently accessing Enum string values using the str property
  3. Maintaining type safety throughout the function

Also applies to: 293-293, 301-301

@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ def extract_devices_data(
if devices.empty:
logger.exception("Failed to download or fetch devices.")
raise RuntimeError("Failed to cached and api devices data.")

print(devices)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace print statement with proper logging.

Using print statements in production code is not recommended. Consider using the logger instead.

-        print(devices)
+        logger.debug(f"Loaded devices: {devices}")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
print(devices)
logger.debug(f"Loaded devices: {devices}")

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit 3e3a75a into airqo-platform:staging Feb 5, 2025
45 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2025
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants