Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spatial readme #4381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

Spatial readme #4381

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

wabinyai
Copy link
Contributor

@wabinyai wabinyai commented Feb 6, 2025

Description

I updated the API usage details and recommended a POST request for improved efficiency.

Related Issues

Changes Made

  • Brief description of change 1
  • Brief description of change 2
  • Brief description of change 3

Testing

  • Tested locally
  • Tested against staging environment
  • Relevant tests passed: [List test names]

Affected Services

  • Which services were modified:
    • Service 1
    • Service 2
    • Other...

Endpoints Ready for Testing

  • New endpoints ready for testing:
    • Endpoint 1
    • Endpoint 2
    • Other...

API Documentation Updated?

  • Yes, API documentation was updated
  • No, API documentation does not need updating

Additional Notes

[Add any additional notes or comments here]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced the site selection guide to emphasize the tool’s machine learning capabilities for optimizing sensor placement.
    • Updated the API usage details, now recommending a POST request for improved efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README in the spatial directory has been updated. The "Site Selection Using Locate Tool" section now explicitly describes a machine learning approach for analyzing and identifying optimal sensor placement locations. Additionally, the API endpoint method has been changed from a GET request to a POST request. The required parameters and example request remain unchanged.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/spatial/README.md Enhanced "Site Selection Using Locate Tool" description with ML details; updated API method (GET → POST)

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant API as API Server
    participant ML as ML Module
    U->>API: POST /api/v2/spatial/site_location with payload
    API->>ML: Process sensor placement using ML
    ML-->>API: Return optimal locations
    API-->>U: Deliver response
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective ([#123], [#456]) Addressed Explanation
[#123] PR Template Formalization No changes related to the Github PR template were made.
[#456] Calculate Exceedances The PR does not modify or implement exceedance calculations.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation, priority-high

Suggested reviewers

  • Baalmart

Poem

In the realm of docs so bright,
A POST replaces a GET tonight,
ML dances with sensor lore,
Guiding placements to explore,
A merge of updates, clear and neat—
Code and docs in joyful fleet! 😊

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Errors were encountered while retrieving linked issues.

Errors (1)
  • JIRA integration encountered authorization issues. Please disconnect and reconnect the integration in the CodeRabbit UI.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.21%. Comparing base (50b701d) to head (7854ea7).
Report is 5 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4381   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.21%   11.21%           
========================================
  Files          156      156           
  Lines        17985    17985           
  Branches       388      388           
========================================
  Hits          2017     2017           
  Misses       15966    15966           
  Partials         2        2           

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/spatial/README.md (2)

94-94: Enhanced Locate Tool Description with ML Capabilities

The updated description clearly states that the Locate Tool leverages Machine Learning (ML) to analyze and identify optimal sensor placement within a defined polygon. This added detail improves clarity regarding its purpose.

Note: Ensure that similar language consistency is maintained throughout the documentation—specifically, verify that the term "analyze" is used uniformly (avoid mixing with "analyse") as highlighted by the static analysis hint.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~94-~94: Do not mix variants of the same word (‘analyze’ and ‘analyse’) within a single text.
Context: ...ement by using Machine Learning (ML) to analyze and identify optimal locations within a...

(EN_WORD_COHERENCY)


123-123: Typographical Correction Needed

There is a minor typo in the note on line 123: "withinh" should be corrected to "within".

A suggested diff for clarity:

- Must have locations should be  coordinates withinh the polygon.
+ Must have locations should be coordinates within the polygon.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50b701d and 7854ea7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/spatial/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/spatial/README.md

[uncategorized] ~94-~94: Do not mix variants of the same word (‘analyze’ and ‘analyse’) within a single text.
Context: ...ement by using Machine Learning (ML) to analyze and identify optimal locations within a...

(EN_WORD_COHERENCY)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build-push-deploy-spatial
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/spatial/README.md (1)

97-98: Updated API Endpoint Method

The HTTP method for the site_location endpoint has been updated from GET to POST, reflecting the new design intended for sensor placement requests. Please confirm that backend logic and corresponding tests have also been updated to support POST requests.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Spatial changes in this PR available for preview here

@wabinyai wabinyai assigned Baalmart and wabinyai and unassigned Baalmart Feb 6, 2025
@wabinyai wabinyai requested a review from Baalmart February 6, 2025 13:39
@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit 5ded992 into staging Feb 6, 2025
52 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart deleted the Readme-update branch February 6, 2025 16:16
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2025
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants