Skip to content

Conversation

@coding-ice
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coding-ice coding-ice requested a review from afc163 October 11, 2025 07:20
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 11, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2025

⚡️ Deploying PR Preview...

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @coding-ice, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates Biome, a modern linter and formatter, into the project's development workflow. The primary goal is to standardize the codebase's style and improve maintainability by automatically enforcing consistent formatting and identifying potential issues. This involved configuring Biome's rules, adding a dedicated script for its execution, and subsequently reformatting existing files to align with the new standards. Additionally, some minor structural improvements were made to React components by moving helper components out of their parent components.

Highlights

  • Biome Tooling Integration: Introduced Biome as the new code formatter and linter for the project, enhancing code quality and consistency.
  • Codebase Reformatting: Applied Biome's formatting rules across the entire codebase, leading to standardized code style and improved readability.
  • Biome Configuration Updates: Modified biome.json to refine ignore patterns for specific directories and adjusted linting rules, including disabling useUniqueElementIds.
  • Refactoring of React Components: Extracted several inline functional components (CardInfo, IconText, AvatarView, MoreBtn) into standalone functions or components for improved modularity and better component structure.
  • Build Script Enhancement: Added a new biome script to package.json to easily run Biome checks and auto-format the code.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces Biome for code formatting and linting, and applies formatting across the codebase. The changes are mostly stylistic and improve code consistency. Several components have also been refactored out of render methods, which is a great improvement for performance and maintainability. I've found a couple of points to discuss: one in the Biome configuration and a regression in one of the refactored components that needs to be addressed.

@coding-ice coding-ice mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2025
12 tasks
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 25.92593% with 20 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 39.18%. Comparing base (c6973db) to head (dfe8fbc).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on all-blocks.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/pages/list/search/articles/index.tsx 10.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
...s/account/center/components/Applications/index.tsx 28.57% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/pages/list/basic-list/index.tsx 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
src/pages/account/settings/components/base.tsx 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
...pages/account/center/components/Articles/index.tsx 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           all-blocks   #11572      +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage       39.04%   39.18%   +0.13%     
==============================================
  Files             194      194              
  Lines            2323     2325       +2     
  Branches          399      399              
==============================================
+ Hits              907      911       +4     
- Misses           1412     1414       +2     
+ Partials            4        0       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@coding-ice
Copy link
Member Author

check 了一下,覆盖率掉了,这个需要解决不

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Oct 22, 2025
@afc163 afc163 merged commit a1b37b4 into ant-design:all-blocks Oct 22, 2025
10 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants