Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

accounts-db: relax intrabatch account locks #4253

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions Cargo.lock

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions accounts-db/Cargo.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ solana-accounts-db = { path = ".", features = ["dev-context-only-utils"] }
solana-compute-budget = { workspace = true }
solana-instruction = { workspace = true }
solana-logger = { workspace = true }
solana-reserved-account-keys = { workspace = true }
solana-sdk-ids = { workspace = true }
solana-signature = { workspace = true, features = ["rand"] }
solana-slot-history = { workspace = true }
static_assertions = { workspace = true }
strum = { workspace = true, features = ["derive"] }
Expand Down
20 changes: 14 additions & 6 deletions accounts-db/benches/bench_lock_accounts.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -62,16 +62,21 @@ fn create_test_transactions(lock_count: usize, read_conflicts: bool) -> Vec<Sani
fn bench_entry_lock_accounts(c: &mut Criterion) {
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("bench_lock_accounts");

for (batch_size, lock_count, read_conflicts) in
iproduct!(BATCH_SIZES, LOCK_COUNTS, [false, true])
for (batch_size, lock_count, read_conflicts, relax_intrabatch_account_locks) in
iproduct!(BATCH_SIZES, LOCK_COUNTS, [false, true], [false, true])
{
let name = format!(
"batch_size_{batch_size}_locks_count_{lock_count}{}",
"batch_size_{batch_size}_locks_count_{lock_count}{}{}",
if read_conflicts {
"_read_conflicts"
} else {
""
}
},
if relax_intrabatch_account_locks {
"_simd83"
} else {
"_old"
},
);

let accounts_db = AccountsDb::new_single_for_tests();
Expand All @@ -84,8 +89,11 @@ fn bench_entry_lock_accounts(c: &mut Criterion) {
group.bench_function(name.as_str(), move |b| {
b.iter(|| {
for batch in &transaction_batches {
let results =
accounts.lock_accounts(black_box(batch.iter()), MAX_TX_ACCOUNT_LOCKS);
let results = accounts.lock_accounts(
black_box(batch.iter()),
MAX_TX_ACCOUNT_LOCKS,
relax_intrabatch_account_locks,
);
accounts.unlock_accounts(batch.iter().zip(&results));
}
})
Expand Down
100 changes: 73 additions & 27 deletions accounts-db/src/account_locks.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,13 +5,13 @@ use {
solana_message::AccountKeys,
solana_pubkey::Pubkey,
solana_transaction::sanitized::MAX_TX_ACCOUNT_LOCKS,
solana_transaction_error::TransactionError,
solana_transaction_error::{TransactionError, TransactionResult},
std::{cell::RefCell, collections::hash_map},
};

#[derive(Debug, Default)]
pub struct AccountLocks {
write_locks: AHashSet<Pubkey>,
write_locks: AHashMap<Pubkey, u64>,
readonly_locks: AHashMap<Pubkey, u64>,
}
Comment on lines 12 to 16
Copy link
Member Author

@2501babe 2501babe Jan 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because the read- and write-lock hashmaps have the same type now, all the functions that change them are basically the same. we could use an enum or hashmap reference to discriminate and delete half of the functions, but i left it like this for your review before butchering it


Expand All @@ -20,10 +20,61 @@ impl AccountLocks {
/// The bool in the tuple indicates if the account is writable.
/// Returns an error if any of the accounts are already locked in a way
/// that conflicts with the requested lock.
/// NOTE this is the pre-SIMD83 logic and can be removed once SIMD83 is active.
pub fn try_lock_accounts<'a>(
&mut self,
keys: impl Iterator<Item = (&'a Pubkey, bool)> + Clone,
) -> Result<(), TransactionError> {
) -> TransactionResult<()> {
self.can_lock_accounts(keys.clone())?;
self.lock_accounts(keys);

Ok(())
}

/// Lock accounts for all transactions in a batch which don't conflict
/// with existing locks. Returns a vector of `TransactionResult` indicating
/// success or failure for each transaction in the batch.
/// NOTE this is the SIMD83 logic; after the feature is active, it becomes
/// the only logic, and this note can be removed with the feature gate.
pub fn try_lock_transaction_batch<'a>(
&mut self,
validated_batch_keys: impl Iterator<
Item = TransactionResult<impl Iterator<Item = (&'a Pubkey, bool)> + Clone>,
>,
) -> Vec<TransactionResult<()>> {
let available_batch_keys: Vec<_> = validated_batch_keys
.map(|validated_keys| {
validated_keys
.clone()
.and_then(|keys| self.can_lock_accounts(keys))
.and(validated_keys)
})
.collect();

available_batch_keys
.into_iter()
.map(|available_keys| available_keys.map(|keys| self.lock_accounts(keys)))
.collect()
Comment on lines +54 to +57
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure that available_keys is a cheap iterator. We clone validated_keys above before iterating so looks like we will be doing the duplicate-tx-check and the duplicate-tx-account-check twice.

Playground link: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=93f1ae58f8c376195e41af4ad91872ff

}

/// Unlock the account keys in `keys` after a transaction.
/// The bool in the tuple indicates if the account is writable.
/// In debug-mode this function will panic if an attempt is made to unlock
/// an account that wasn't locked in the way requested.
pub fn unlock_accounts<'a>(&mut self, keys: impl Iterator<Item = (&'a Pubkey, bool)>) {
for (k, writable) in keys {
if writable {
self.unlock_write(k);
} else {
self.unlock_readonly(k);
}
}
}

fn can_lock_accounts<'a>(
&self,
keys: impl Iterator<Item = (&'a Pubkey, bool)> + Clone,
) -> TransactionResult<()> {
for (key, writable) in keys.clone() {
if writable {
if !self.can_write_lock(key) {
Expand All @@ -34,27 +85,15 @@ impl AccountLocks {
}
}

for (key, writable) in keys {
if writable {
self.lock_write(key);
} else {
self.lock_readonly(key);
}
}

Ok(())
}

/// Unlock the account keys in `keys` after a transaction.
/// The bool in the tuple indicates if the account is writable.
/// In debug-mode this function will panic if an attempt is made to unlock
/// an account that wasn't locked in the way requested.
pub fn unlock_accounts<'a>(&mut self, keys: impl Iterator<Item = (&'a Pubkey, bool)>) {
for (k, writable) in keys {
fn lock_accounts<'a>(&mut self, keys: impl Iterator<Item = (&'a Pubkey, bool)> + Clone) {
for (key, writable) in keys {
if writable {
self.unlock_write(k);
self.lock_write(key);
} else {
self.unlock_readonly(k);
self.lock_readonly(key);
}
}
}
Expand All @@ -66,7 +105,7 @@ impl AccountLocks {

#[cfg_attr(feature = "dev-context-only-utils", qualifiers(pub))]
fn is_locked_write(&self, key: &Pubkey) -> bool {
self.write_locks.contains(key)
self.write_locks.get(key).is_some_and(|count| *count > 0)
}

fn can_read_lock(&self, key: &Pubkey) -> bool {
Expand All @@ -84,7 +123,7 @@ impl AccountLocks {
}

fn lock_write(&mut self, key: &Pubkey) {
self.write_locks.insert(*key);
*self.write_locks.entry(*key).or_default() += 1;
}

fn unlock_readonly(&mut self, key: &Pubkey) {
Expand All @@ -103,19 +142,26 @@ impl AccountLocks {
}

fn unlock_write(&mut self, key: &Pubkey) {
let removed = self.write_locks.remove(key);
debug_assert!(
removed,
"Attempted to remove a write-lock for a key that wasn't write-locked"
);
if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut occupied_entry) = self.write_locks.entry(*key) {
let count = occupied_entry.get_mut();
*count -= 1;
if *count == 0 {
occupied_entry.remove_entry();
}
} else {
debug_assert!(
false,
"Attempted to remove a write-lock for a key that wasn't write-locked"
);
}
}
}

/// Validate account locks before locking.
pub fn validate_account_locks(
account_keys: AccountKeys,
tx_account_lock_limit: usize,
) -> Result<(), TransactionError> {
) -> TransactionResult<()> {
if account_keys.len() > tx_account_lock_limit {
Err(TransactionError::TooManyAccountLocks)
} else if has_duplicates(account_keys) {
Expand Down
Loading
Loading