Add support for multiple Celery worker groups with queue-specific configurations #56589
+444
−240
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds support for multiple Celery worker groups. Each group can now be independently configured to target specific queues and use distinct resource settings
Changes
New Configuration:
workers.celeryQueueGroups
Added support for defining multiple worker deployments through the
workers.celeryQueueGroups
configuration. Each group can specify:name
: (required) Unique name for the worker groupqueues
: (required) Comma-separated list of Celery queuesreplicas
: (required) Number of worker replicasnodeSelector
: (optional)affinity
: (optional)tolerations
: (optional)topologySpreadConstraints
: (optional)resources
: (optional)labels
: (optional)podAnnotations
: (optional)priorityClassName
: (optional)env
: (optional)worker-deployment.yaml
LogicceleryQueueGroups
defined), the template maintains original setup using existingworkers.* configuration
exec airflow celery worker --queues <group-queues>
worker-service.yaml
Logicworker-group
label selector{{ airflow.fullname }}-worker-<group-name>
closes: #56591
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rst
or{issue_number}.significant.rst
, in airflow-core/newsfragments.