Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IGNITE-22994 Refactor subscription to activation/deactivation events … #11480

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

alex-plekhanov
Copy link
Contributor

…for internal components

Thank you for submitting the pull request to the Apache Ignite.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution
we ask you to ensure the following steps have been taken:

The Contribution Checklist

  • There is a single JIRA ticket related to the pull request.
  • The web-link to the pull request is attached to the JIRA ticket.
  • The JIRA ticket has the Patch Available state.
  • The pull request body describes changes that have been made.
    The description explains WHAT and WHY was made instead of HOW.
  • The pull request title is treated as the final commit message.
    The following pattern must be used: IGNITE-XXXX Change summary where XXXX - number of JIRA issue.
  • A reviewer has been mentioned through the JIRA comments
    (see the Maintainers list)
  • The pull request has been checked by the Teamcity Bot and
    the green visa attached to the JIRA ticket (see TC.Bot: Check PR)

Notes

If you need any help, please email [email protected] or ask anу advice on http://asf.slack.com #ignite channel.

@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ public GridTaskProcessor(GridKernalContext ctx) {
ctx.io().addMessageListener(TOPIC_TASK_CANCEL, new TaskCancelMessageListener());
ctx.io().addMessageListener(TOPIC_TASK, new JobMessageListener(true));

ctx.internalSubscriptionProcessor().registerGlobalStateListener(this);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GridTaskProcessor is a GridComponent. Its onKernalStart() and onKernalStop() are called by IgniteKernal. We call twice onKernalStart(). Looks wierd. Should it be either GridComponent or IgniteChangeGlobalStateSupport but not both?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In scope of refactoring we shouldn't change logic. It was called twice before changes, perhaps there is a reason for this.

@@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ public GridEncryptionManager(GridKernalContext ctx) {
}
});

ctx.internalSubscriptionProcessor().registerGlobalStateListener(this);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GridEncryptionManager doesn't call onKernalStart on activation. As for GridTaskProcessor, investigation is required and this activity is out of scope of this ticket.

@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ public GridTaskProcessor(GridKernalContext ctx) {
ctx.io().addMessageListener(TOPIC_TASK_CANCEL, new TaskCancelMessageListener());
ctx.io().addMessageListener(TOPIC_TASK, new JobMessageListener(true));

ctx.internalSubscriptionProcessor().registerGlobalStateListener(this);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In scope of refactoring we shouldn't change logic. It was called twice before changes, perhaps there is a reason for this.

Copy link

@asfgit asfgit closed this in edb32fa Aug 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants