For multiKey simulation - use signature of same type #645
+7
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GhostWalker562
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Previously multikey just used null ed25519 signatures. This gave too optimistic gasEstimates which would lead to MAX_GAS_UNITS_BELOW_MIN_TRANSACTION_GAS_UNITS error. It is better to be pessimistic within reason.
TODO - only include N signatures where N = signaturesRequired. Right now we have N = num of pub keys
Test Plan
Related Links
Checklist
pnpm fmt?CHANGELOG.md?