Adjust release procedure and CI system for "trunk-based" development strategy #2120
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, releases were always made from a point in the revision history of the
main
branch (typically the tip of the branch at the time of the release). Although the simplicity of this approach is nice, it can be limiting in some cases. For this reason, the project is switching to using a "trunk-based" development strategy, as described here:https://trunkbaseddevelopment.com/
This approach allows making releases at any time that consist of the arbitrary subset of revisions suitable for shipping to the users at that time. The commits that should be included in the release are cherry-picked to a release branch and the tag created on that branch.
This means that:
main
branch as soon as they have passed review rather than having to postpone the merge of changes that are not ready to be included in the next release.main
branch contains changes that are not ready to be included in the release.This development strategy is already in use in other Arduino Tooling projects (e.g., Arduino CLI, Arduino Lint, and Arduino Firmware Uploader).
The documented release procedure must be adjusted to reflect the new development strategy.
CI System Adjustments
The status of the GitHub Actions workflows should be evaluated before making a release. However, this is not so simple as checking the status of the commit at the tip of the release branch. The reason is that, for the sake of efficiency, the workflows are configured to run only when the processes are relevant to the trigger event (e.g., no need to run unit tests for a change to the readme).
In the case of the default branch, you can simply set the workflow runs filter to that branch and then check the result of the latest run of each workflow of interest. However, that was not possible to do with the release branch since it might be that the workflow was never run in that branch. The status of the latest run of the workflow in the default branch might not match the status for the release branch if the release branch does not contain the full history.
For this reason, it will be helpful to trigger all relevant workflows on the creation of a release branch. This will ensure that each of those workflows will always have at least one run in the release branch. Subsequent commits pushed to the branch can run based on their usual trigger filters and the status of the latest run of each workflow in the branch will provide an accurate indication of the state of that branch.
Branches are created for purposes other than releases, most notably feature branches to stage work for a pull request. Due to the comprehensive nature of this project's CI system, it would not be convenient or efficient to fully run all CI workflows on the creation of every feature branch.
Unfortunately, GitHub Actions does not support filters on the
create
event of branch creation like it does for thepush
andpull_request
events. There is support for abranches
filter of thepush
event, but that filter is an "AND" to thepaths
filter while this application requires an "OR". For this reason, the workflows must be triggered by the creation of any branch. The unwanted job runs are prevented by adding arun-determination
job with the branch filter handled by Bash commands. The other jobs of the workflow use thisrun-determination
job as a dependency, only running when it indicates they should via a job output. Because this minimalrun-determination
job runs very quickly, it is roughly equivalent to the workflow having been skipped entirely for non-release branch creations.This system has been in use in the Tooling Team's collection of reusable "asset" workflows:
And in the downstream consumers of those workflows:
Motivation
Change description
Other information
Reviewer checklist