This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 238
Fix arrow functions inside ternary expressions #408
Merged
winstliu
merged 6 commits into
atom:master
from
MaximSokolov:fix-arrow-functions-inside-teranry-exp
Aug 23, 2016
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2329ef2
:bug: Fix arrow functions inside ternary expressions
MaximSokolov a2ae466
:fire: Remove unneeded code
MaximSokolov 3d1f8f3
:white_check_mark: Add test for debugger statement
MaximSokolov 7296d5d
:fire: Remove unneeded code
MaximSokolov 9945c23
Add subscope for debugger keyword
MaximSokolov 157241d
:art: Move rule to the repo
MaximSokolov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain what this match does in more detail?
In addition, why is the second
$self
needed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See 157241d. There is no need to include
$self
here. Though most of the rules must be moved to the repo and it also requires addition testing, so I kept it as is for now. The second$self
includes everything else between?
and: