tech-dose-assignments

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/comparable-vs-comparator-in-java/ https://github.com/Java-Techie-jt https://github.com/basanta-spring-boot https://github.com/iamkhs/Head-First-Java https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gy9cmPwNhZvola7kqnfY3DElk7PYrz2ARpaCODTp8Go/edit#gid=0 https://github.com/lokeshgupta1981/Spring-Cloud https://github.com/Eric-programming/CodeSolution/blob/master/src/Object_Oriented_Programming/Abstraction/Abstraction.java

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

JSON Processing Libraries: Jackson's ObjectMapper vs. org.json.JSONObject

https://www.baeldung.com/jackson-object-mapper-tutorial

When working with JSON data in Java, you have the option to choose between different libraries. Two popular choices are Jackson's ObjectMapper and the org.json.JSONObject class. Both libraries have their own strengths, features, and use cases. Below is a comparison to help you decide which one best suits your needs.

Library Overview

• Jackson's ObjectMapper:

  • Part of the Jackson library, a comprehensive JSON-processing library for Java.
  • Offers advanced features for both serialization (Java objects to JSON) and deserialization (JSON to Java objects).
  • Provides a highly customizable and flexible API.

• org.json.JSONObject:

  • Part of the org.json library, a lightweight JSON library for Java.
  • Primarily used for basic JSON manipulation tasks.
  • Has a simpler API compared to Jackson.

Usage Scenarios

• Jackson's ObjectMapper:

  • Ideal for projects that require more advanced JSON manipulation, serialization, and deserialization.
  • Suitable for cases involving large or complex JSON structures.
  • Offers better performance for handling demanding use cases.

• org.json.JSONObject:

  • Best suited for simple JSON tasks, where lightweight functionality is sufficient.
  • Good for projects with minimal JSON requirements.
  • May not perform as well with very large or intricate JSON data.

Customization and Flexibility

• Jackson's ObjectMapper:

  • Provides extensive customization options, including custom serializers/deserializers and naming strategies.
  • Allows fine-tuning of serialization and deserialization processes.

• org.json.JSONObject:

  • Offers fewer customization options compared to Jackson.
  • Simpler and more straightforward API.

Performance

• Jackson's ObjectMapper:

  • Known for better performance, especially with larger JSON files and complex structures.
  • Offers options for streaming and incremental parsing, making it memory-efficient.

• org.json.JSONObject:

  • Suitable for simpler cases, but may not perform as well with very large or complex JSON data.

Dependencies

• Jackson's ObjectMapper:

  • Requires inclusion of the Jackson library as a dependency in your project.

• org.json.JSONObject:

  • Standalone library with no external dependencies.

Choose the library that best aligns with your project's requirements, whether it's the advanced features and customization options of Jackson's ObjectMapper or the simplicity and lightweight nature of org.json.JSONObject.

Remember to consider factors such as project complexity, performance needs, and customization requirements when making your decision.