Skip to content

Conversation

@mkeemon
Copy link

@mkeemon mkeemon commented Jul 23, 2021

The inverse_relationship option was missing from the documentation. This led to a lot of digging into the internals to properly set up has_many through and has_and_belongs_to_many relationships using Resources.

The `inverse_relationship` option was missing from the documentation. This led to a lot of digging into the internals  to properly set up `has_many through` and `has_and_belongs_to_many` relationships using Resources.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant