Add more simulation controls to ExpectOptions
#156
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CI fails stochastically on some tests due to conservative settings of
eStopAfterEmpty.This pull request adjusts the implementation of
propWithModelto give the user more control over the stalling generation. Furthermore it makes settingeoStopAfterEmptyoptional and adds a default derivation method.This default is conservative, some circuits might rely on the last transaction for it to start producing data so we assume maximum stalling. Do note that this new configuration severely lowers the default number of stall moments to 10. Problems that arise only when there are more than 10 individual stall moments will never be caught be the default configuration.
However, I don't expect this to be the case for 99% of the circuits, making it a sensible default.