feat(heureka): integrate GraphQL backend

[taymoor89]

Summary

This PR configures graphql-codegen to generate types and hooks from GraphQL Schema as well as configures ApolloClient to communicate with the GraphQL backend.

Changes Made

• graphql-codegen configured.
• ApolloClient configured.
• Lists services in raw form to demonstrate successful communication.

Related Issues

• [Task](Heureka): Integrate graphql backend #761

Screenshots (if applicable)

Testing Instructions

1. npm i
2. npm run dev

Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable).
• My changes generate no new warnings or errors.
• I have created a changeset for my changes.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: b22ba0a

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
heureka-next	Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

PR Preview Action v1.6.0
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2025-02-18 12:28 UTC

[hodanoori]

Thanks Taimoor. I'm wondering why preview of heureka-next is not loading for me whereas the heureka preview is coming up. Is it the same for you?

[taymoor89]

Thanks Taimoor. I'm wondering why preview of heureka-next is not loading for me whereas the heureka preview is coming up. Is it the same for you?

Yes I was also facing the same issue, the problem was that there was no apiEndpoint defined. The script was unable to generate appProps.json file because we do not have HEUREKA_NEXT_APP_PROPS_BASE64 secret configured. For the moment I've reused HEUREKA_APP_PROPS_BASE64 secret because it is essentially the same but I'll talk to Arturo to help us create one.

[hodanoori]

lgtm

[barsukov]

good job for all of us! ;)
I think we should not mock Services on tests of The shell, just write a simple tests for services...
other than that looks perfect

[barsukov]

LGTM!

[hodanoori]

lgtm