Skip to content

Added a few new chapters & made some minor fixes (links and such) #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rachlobay
Copy link

@rachlobay rachlobay commented Jul 11, 2023

Added 3 new chapters

  1. Intro. to Tidymodels - Part 2
  2. Regression in Tidymodels - Part 2
  3. Introducing the ARX forecaster
    & tried to do some basic formatting to them. Also made some minor fixes (links and typos), added some of my clipart drawings, and did some minor reordering of the chapters on the left sidebar (though perhaps how to best order them & make stuff flow better from one to the next should be discussed at a future meeting).

@rachlobay rachlobay requested a review from dajmcdon as a code owner July 11, 2023 00:01
Copy link
Contributor

@dajmcdon dajmcdon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't had a chance to pull and examine the extra chapters yet. I'll get there though. One small change for the moment.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure where this is from, but can we do the ones that have multiple aheads as geom_ribbon() instead of interval? See for example Section 10.2.

Copy link
Contributor

@dajmcdon dajmcdon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general, I think most of the language is far too informal. I made lots of comments to this effect, but I think all of it needs a read through/edit with this in mind.

I also wonder if there's a bit too much tidymodels stuff now. I like the idea of providing some background that is needed to understand how to use our package, but I'm a bit concerned that we've gone too far.

@rachlobay rachlobay requested a review from dajmcdon October 28, 2023 13:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants