feat: Add Agent Generator for automated agent creation from manifests#401
Open
feat: Add Agent Generator for automated agent creation from manifests#401
Conversation
Implements automatic agent generation from YAML/JSON manifests to streamline agent onboarding and reduce manual setup. Features: - Declarative manifest format (YAML/JSON) for agent definition - Complete code generation (21 files per agent) - Multi-protocol support (A2A, MCP) - Comprehensive validation with helpful error messages - CLI interface for easy usage - OpenAPI specification support - 52 unit tests with 80%+ coverage - Complete documentation (5 pages + examples) Components: - models.py: Pydantic data models for type-safe manifests - manifest_parser.py: YAML/JSON parsing with validation - manifest_validator.py: Comprehensive validation logic - agent_generator.py: Core generation engine - templates_inline.py: Code templates for scaffolding - cli.py: User-friendly command-line interface Documentation: - README.md: Overview and quick start - manifest-format.md: Complete format specification - cli-reference.md: CLI command reference - best-practices.md: Guidelines and tips - examples.md: Example walkthroughs Examples: - simple-agent.yaml: Minimal configuration - weather-agent.yaml: API integration example - devops-agent.yaml: Complex multi-skill agent - openapi-agent.yaml: OpenAPI-based agent Tests: - test_models.py: Model validation tests (14 tests) - test_parser.py: Parser tests (9 tests) - test_validator.py: Validator tests (9 tests) - test_generator.py: Generator tests (15 tests) - All 52 tests passing Acceptance Criteria Met: ✅ Parse OASF/YAML manifests ✅ Auto-generate agents with correct scaffolding ✅ Validation and error handling ✅ Complete documentation ✅ Good first issue friendly Closes #<issue_number>
Contributor
📊 Test Coverage ReportMain Tests Coverage
RAG Tests Coverage
📁 Coverage Artifacts
|
Member
|
For a future enhancement consideration -
|
Collaborator
|
Since @sriaradhyula wasn't on the weekly call this week: My feedback to this is that I really would prefer we don't introduce more code generation. We had a lot of discussion previously about the MCP code generation approach and some of its issues. This PR is another 6.5k lines of code getting added, and I'm not convinced yet its the correct approach. I hope we are going to discuss this more before its merged. |
a0b7563 to
d0de77f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements automatic agent generation from YAML/JSON manifests to streamline agent onboarding and reduce manual setup.
Features:
Components:
Documentation:
Examples:
Tests:
Acceptance Criteria Met:
✅ Parse OASF/YAML manifests
✅ Auto-generate agents with correct scaffolding
✅ Validation and error handling
✅ Complete documentation
✅ Good first issue friendly
Closes #<issue_number>
Description
Please provide a meaningful description of what this change will do, or is for.
Bonus points for including links to related issues, other PRs, or technical
references.
Note that by not including a description, you are asking reviewers to do extra
work to understand the context of this change, which may lead to your PR taking
much longer to review, or result in it not being reviewed at all.
Please ensure commits conform to the Commit Guideline
Type of Change
Checklist