Skip to content

Dlesbre/pldi25 nutshell #17

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Dlesbre/pldi25 nutshell #17

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

dlesbre
Copy link
Collaborator

@dlesbre dlesbre commented Apr 24, 2025

Voici un petit nutshell pour notre dernier papier. Si tu as le temps de le relire je suis preneur de retours.

J'ai du changer un peu la config du site pour rajouter le support du mode latex en markdown.

@dlesbre dlesbre requested a review from mlemerre April 24, 2025 13:22
(polyhedra has $$\mathcal O(2^{|\mathbb X|})$$ complexity).

In the middle of this spectrum lie *weakly-relational abstractions*. They only
store a select few relations between pairs of variables. For example, octagons
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Je ne pense pas que la definition soit la bonne; pour moi weakly-relational c'est des relations entre des paires de variable seulement (mais pas forcement sur certaines variables)

a transitive closure to find all known relations, which costs $$\mathcal O(|\mathbb X|^3)$$.

Thus, the central assumption of the paper can be expressed as **what if we do not need to compute
this transitive closure?** More formally, we assume that the relation obtained on each path between
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this expensive transitive closure? (On en calcule une, elle est juste plus efficace)

the "union" operation has been renamed "add_relation", and the get_relation operation
is new.
</center>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Peut-etre etre precautionneux quant au fait que ca existe deja?

@dlesbre
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dlesbre commented Apr 25, 2025

J'ai modifié pour prendre en compte tes commentaires. J'ai aussi rajouté des exemples concrets de la section 7.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants