vendor: respect repository field in restore and update

[cryptix]

Somehow the repository field from the manifest isn't used.

With this I can replace packages with forks.

[davecheney]

I deeply regret adding restore to gb vendor, thanks for fixing this, I’ll take a look soon.

…

On 11 Jan 2018, at 05:45, Henry ***@***.***> wrote: Somehow the repository field from the manifest isn't used. With this I can replace packages with forks. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: #730 Commit Summary respect repository field in restore and update File Changes M cmd/gb-vendor/restore.go (8) M cmd/gb-vendor/update.go (2) Patch Links: https://github.com/constabulary/gb/pull/730.patch https://github.com/constabulary/gb/pull/730.diff — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[cryptix]

I deeply regret adding restore to gb vendor, ...

oh why is that?

I might not be best style but I tend to keep small patches inside my tree until I move them to PRs/external forks. It reduces the overhead of dealing with a lot more repos for me and the restore command is pretty helpful to get back the upstream state.

[davecheney]

It has been the biggest source of bugs, especially when people became so reliant on it that parallel downloading of artifacts had to be implemented.

…

On 11 Jan 2018, at 19:02, Henry ***@***.***> wrote: I deeply regret adding restore to gb vendor. oh why is that? I might not be best style but I tend to keep small patches inside my tree until I move them to PRs/external forks. It reduces the overhead of dealing with a lot more repos for me and the restore command is pretty helpful to get back the upstream state. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[cryptix]

I just noticed an issue with my approach. Consider these two entries in manifest, they retrieve two packages from the same repository.

Since I just replaced importPath with repository, it now clones the root of the repositories into the two improtpath locations, leading to a broken vendor state.

Disregard the previous comment. Somehow my vendor/manifest didn't have "path": "..." entries to build the correct copy.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #730 into master will increase coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #730      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   50.52%   50.7%   +0.18%     
=========================================
  Files          42      41       -1     
  Lines        3119    3102      -17     
=========================================
- Hits         1576    1573       -3     
+ Misses       1405    1386      -19     
- Partials      138     143       +5

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
build.go
cmd/gb/build.go	71.34% <0%> (+66.47%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f11784c...0153a33. Read the comment docs.

[cryptix]

Testing this some more, I noticed that I broke vanity imports.

I pushed a really dirty hack in 0153a33 to make golang.org/x/... work again but it's not good since it only works for go.googlesource.com/....