WIP: Add Zero Touch Satellite Registration Process in Ground Control #48
Conversation
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Updated group state artifact with nesting Added flattening of state artifact top groups contains state of all subgroups Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Tip OpenAI O1 model for chat
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
ground-control/sql/schema/011_projects.sql (1)
6-6: Consider renaming theprojectscolumn toproject_name.To avoid confusion with the table name and to be more specific, consider renaming the
projectscolumn toproject_nameor a similar name that clearly indicates it holds the name of an individual project.Apply this diff to rename the column:
CREATE TABLE projects ( id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, - projects VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, + project_name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW() NOT NULL, updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW() NOT NULL );ground-control/sql/queries/satellite_groups.sql (2)
6-8: The query is correctly implemented, but consider adding a check for the existence of the satellite and group.The
RemoveSatelliteFromGroupquery is correctly implemented. TheWHEREclause ensures that only the specified satellite is removed from the specified group.However, it might be a good practice to add a check to ensure that the satellite and group exist before attempting to remove the association. This can be done by using a
SELECTstatement to check for the existence of thesatellite_idandgroup_idin their respective tables before executing theDELETEstatement.
10-13: The query is correctly implemented, but consider adding a check for the existence of the satellite.The
GetGroupsBySatelliteIDquery is correctly implemented. TheJOINoperation ensures that only the groups associated with the specified satellite are returned.However, it might be a good practice to add a check to ensure that the satellite exists before attempting to retrieve the associated groups. This can be done by using a
SELECTstatement to check for the existence of thesatellite_idin thesatellitestable before executing theJOINoperation.ground-control/sql/queries/groups.sql (1)
10-13: Consider selecting only the required columns.The
GetSubgroupsquery looks good. It correctly retrieves all subgroups of a given parent group by its ID using theWHEREclause, which is a good practice. The query returns all columns from thegroupstable for the subgroups, which may not be necessary in all cases.Consider selecting only the required columns in the query to improve performance and reduce the amount of data transferred. For example:
SELECT id, group_name, parent_group_id, created_at, updated_at FROM groups WHERE parent_group_id = $1;internal/utils/auth.go (1)
10-24: LGTM!The
Authfunction is well-implemented and follows good practices:
- It handles the case when the required environment variables are not set by returning an appropriate error.
- It uses
os.Getenvto retrieve the credentials from the environment variables.- It constructs an
authn.Authenticatorusing theauthn.FromConfigmethod from thego-containerregistrypackage with the provided credentials.- It returns the authenticator and a
nilerror on success, orniland the corresponding error on failure.To improve the code's readability and maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the function's purpose and the expected environment variables. Here's an example:
+// Auth creates an authentication mechanism using credentials sourced from environment variables. +// It expects the HARBOR_USERNAME and HARBOR_PASSWORD environment variables to be set. func Auth() (authn.Authenticator, error) { // ... }ground-control/sql/queries/images.sql (1)
5-6: LGTM! Consider pagination for scalability.The
ListImagesquery is implemented correctly and retrieves all records from theimagestable.However, as the table grows, retrieving all records without any filtering or pagination might impact performance. Consider adding pagination support in the future if needed for better scalability.
ground-control/internal/server/server.go (1)
38-38: LGTM! The comment is a good placeholder for future enhancements.The comment indicates a plan to create a dynamic connection string based on the environment (production or development). This aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the functionality related to satellite registration within the Ground Control system, as it suggests an intention to improve the configurability of the server in future iterations.
When implementing this enhancement in the future, consider the following suggestions:
- Use environment variables to determine the current environment (e.g.,
ENV=productionorENV=development).- Create separate connection string templates for each environment, with placeholders for the dynamic values (e.g.,
connStrProdandconnStrDev).- Use a switch statement or if-else block to select the appropriate connection string template based on the environment.
- Replace the placeholders in the selected connection string template with the actual values from the environment variables.
This approach will allow for a clean separation of connection settings based on the environment and make it easier to manage and configure the server in different deployment contexts.
ground-control/internal/database/label_images.sql.go (1)
80-94: LGTM!The new SQL command
RemoveImageFromLabeland its corresponding Go code are correctly implemented and follow the existing coding style and conventions. The addition of this functionality enhances the database interaction capabilities by enabling the removal of specific image-label associations, which aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the functionality related to satellite registration within the Ground Control system.Please consider updating the documentation to reflect the new
RemoveImageFromLabelfunctionality, including its purpose, usage, and any relevant examples or considerations.ground-control/reg/satelliteState.go (1)
84-199: LGTM with a few suggestions!The
PushStateArtifactfunction is well-structured and follows a logical flow for creating and pushing state artifacts. The use of a temporary file, handling of both group states and satellite states, and sourcing credentials from environment variables are all good practices.Here are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding more detailed error messages or logging statements to help with debugging in case of failures.
- The function currently returns an error if the manifest already exists in the repository. Consider providing an option to overwrite the existing artifact if desired.
- The function could be split into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability. For example, the code for establishing the remote repository connection could be extracted into a separate function.
Overall, the function is well-implemented and provides a solid foundation for pushing state artifacts to a registry.
ground-control/internal/server/handlers.go (5)
129-154: Consider adding logging statements.The function looks good overall. However, consider adding logging statements to track the deletion of groups for better visibility and debugging purposes.
281-306: Clarify the difference between the ZTR process and the regular satellite registration process.The
ztrHandlerfunction is very similar to theregisterSatelliteHandlerfunction. Please clarify how the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process is different from the regular satellite registration process. Consider adding comments to explain the difference or consolidating the two functions if they serve the same purpose.
387-418: Consider adding logging statements.The function looks good overall. However, consider adding logging statements to track the assignment of images to satellites for better visibility and debugging purposes.
420-456: Consider adding logging statements.The function looks good overall. However, consider adding logging statements to track the removal of images from satellites for better visibility and debugging purposes.
579-615: Consider adding logging statements.The function looks good overall. However, consider adding logging statements to track the deletion of images from groups for better visibility and debugging purposes.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
ground-control/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (40)
- ground-control/.env (1 hunks)
- ground-control/go.mod (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/db.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/group_images.sql.go (3 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/groups.sql.go (4 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/images.sql.go (3 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/label_images.sql.go (3 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/labels.sql.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/models.go (2 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/satellite_groups.sql.go (3 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/satellite_images.sql.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/satellite_labels.sql.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/satellites.sql.go (2 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/server/handlers.go (9 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/server/routes.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/server/server.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/utils/helper.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/reg/adapter.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/reg/satelliteState.go (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/queries/group_images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/queries/groups.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/queries/images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/queries/label_images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/queries/satellite_groups.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/queries/satellite_images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/queries/satellites.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/001_satellites.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/002_groups.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/006_images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/007_group_images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/008_label_images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/009_satellite_images.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/010_robots.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/011_projects.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/012_robot_projects.sql (1 hunks)
- internal/replicate/replicate.go (2 hunks)
- internal/satellite/satellite.go (2 hunks)
- internal/state/stateArtifact.go (1 hunks)
- internal/store/http-fetch.go (2 hunks)
- internal/utils/auth.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- ground-control/internal/database/db.go
- ground-control/internal/database/labels.sql.go
- ground-control/internal/database/satellite_labels.sql.go
- ground-control/reg/adapter.go
- ground-control/sql/schema/001_satellites.sql
- ground-control/sql/schema/006_images.sql
- ground-control/sql/schema/007_group_images.sql
- ground-control/sql/schema/008_label_images.sql
Additional comments not posted (90)
ground-control/sql/schema/012_robot_projects.sql (1)
1-10: LGTM! The schema changes are well-designed and follow best practices.The
group_imagestable effectively establishes a many-to-many relationship between robots and projects. The use of foreign keys withON DELETE CASCADEensures data integrity by automatically deleting associated records when a robot or project is deleted. The composite primary key enforces uniqueness for each combination of robot and project.The inclusion of a rollback command is a good practice, as it allows for easy reversal of the schema changes if needed.
Overall, the schema design is clean, efficient, and maintainable.
ground-control/sql/schema/011_projects.sql (2)
1-13: The schema design follows best practices.The
projectstable schema includes:
- A primary key for unique record identification
- Appropriate data types and constraints for each column
- Timestamps for record keeping
- A clear table name and column names
- A down migration for easy rollback
Great job on the overall schema design!
6-6: Verify if theprojectscolumn length is appropriate.The
projectscolumn currently allows string values up to 255 characters in length. Depending on the expected length of project names, this may be excessive and could potentially waste storage space.Please confirm if project names are expected to be up to 255 characters long. If not, consider reducing the length to a more appropriate value based on the expected maximum length of project names.
ground-control/sql/schema/009_satellite_images.sql (1)
1-9: LGTM!The SQL schema changes for creating and dropping the
satellite_imagestable are well-structured and maintain data integrity. The table establishes a proper many-to-many relationship between satellites and images, with appropriate foreign key constraints and cascading deletes. The composite primary key ensures uniqueness for each satellite-image combination. The naming conventions are consistent with the existing schema, and the migrations allow for easy creation and deletion of the table.ground-control/.env (1)
3-3: Verify theHARBOR_URLvalue for the production environment.The
HARBOR_URLis set todemo.goharbor.io, which might be a placeholder or a demo instance. Please ensure that this URL points to the correct Harbor instance for the production environment.To verify, run the following script:
ground-control/sql/schema/002_groups.sql (1)
6-6: LGTM!The addition of the
parent_group_idcolumn with the foreign key constraint andON DELETE SET NULLbehavior is a good approach to introduce a hierarchical structure within the groups. This change aligns with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary.The SQL syntax and the foreign key constraint are correctly implemented.
ground-control/sql/queries/label_images.sql (2)
4-4: LGTM!The addition of the
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHINGclause is a good practice to handle potential duplicates gracefully. It ensures that theINSERToperation is skipped if an entry with the samelabel_idandimage_idalready exists, preventing errors and maintaining data integrity.
6-8: LGTM!The new
RemoveImageFromLabelcommand is a valuable addition that complements the existingAssignImageToLabelcommand. It provides the necessary functionality to remove specific label-image associations using aDELETEstatement with aWHEREclause matching bothlabel_idandimage_id.The command name and parameter placeholders follow the established conventions, making it consistent with the rest of the file. This addition enhances the overall functionality of the
label_imagestable by enabling both assignment and removal operations.ground-control/go.mod (3)
9-9: LGTM!The addition of the
github.com/opencontainers/image-specdependency without the indirect comment aligns with the project's requirements and suggests a direct usage in the codebase.
10-10: LGTM!The addition of the
gopkg.in/yaml.v2dependency introduces YAML processing capabilities to the project. The chosen versionv2.4.0is a stable release of the library.
11-11: Verify the usage oforas.land/oras-go/v2in the codebase.The addition of the
oras.land/oras-go/v2dependency introduces Open Registry API interaction capabilities to the project. The chosen versionv2.5.0is a recent release of the library.Run the following script to verify the usage of this dependency:
Verification successful
Dependency
oras.land/oras-go/v2is correctly implemented and utilized.The
oras.land/oras-go/v2package is extensively used in thePushStateArtifactfunction withinsatelliteState.go. This function leverages various ORAS features to create and push state artifacts to a remote registry, including:
- Packaging manifests with
oras.PackManifest- Copying artifacts with
oras.Copy- Handling remote repositories with
remote.NewRepository- Implementing authentication using
auth.Clientandauth.StaticCredential- Utilizing retry mechanisms with
retry.DefaultClientThe implementation demonstrates proper usage of the ORAS library for interacting with OCI registries, aligning with the intended purpose of the dependency.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `oras.land/oras-go/v2` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the package import and usage. Expect: At least one occurrence of the package import and usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'oras.land/oras-go/v2'Length of output: 753
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the content of satelliteState.go to verify the usage of oras.land/oras-go/v2 # Display the content of the file cat ground-control/reg/satelliteState.go # Search for function calls or variable usage related to the oras package rg --type go -n 'oras\.' ground-control/reg/satelliteState.goLength of output: 5853
ground-control/sql/schema/010_robots.sql (3)
7-8: LGTM!The foreign key constraint on the
satellite_idcolumn ensures data integrity by enforcing a valid relationship between therobotsandsatellitestables. The cascading delete behavior prevents orphaned records in therobotstable when a satellite is deleted.
9-10: LGTM!Including
created_atandupdated_attimestamp columns is a good practice for tracking record creation and modification times. Setting default values to the current time ensures that the timestamps are automatically populated when a new record is inserted, and marking the columns as non-nullable ensures that the timestamp values are always present.
13-14: LGTM!Including a rollback command is a good practice for reversing schema changes if necessary. The command correctly drops the
robotstable, which is the only table created in this schema file.ground-control/sql/queries/satellite_groups.sql (1)
1-4: LGTM!The
AddSatelliteToGroupquery is correctly implemented. The use ofON CONFLICT DO NOTHINGis a good practice to handle potential duplicates and prevent errors.ground-control/sql/queries/satellite_images.sql (3)
1-4: LGTM!The
AssignImageToSatellitequery correctly implements the logic to assign an image to a satellite. The use ofON CONFLICT DO NOTHINGis a good practice to handle duplicates gracefully. This query aligns with the PR objective of implementing the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process for satellites by associating images with satellites.
6-8: LGTM!The
RemoveImageFromSatellitequery correctly implements the logic to remove an image from a satellite. It uses theWHEREclause to match both thesatellite_idandimage_idto ensure the correct record is deleted. This query aligns with the PR objective of implementing the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process for satellites by allowing the removal of image associations from satellites.
10-14: LGTM!The
GetImagesForSatellitequery correctly implements the logic to retrieve all images associated with a specific satellite. It uses theJOINclause to combine theimagesandsatellite_imagestables based on theimage_idforeign key, and theWHEREclause filters the results based on the providedsatellite_idto ensure only the relevant images are returned. This query aligns with the PR objective of implementing the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process for satellites by allowing the retrieval of associated images for a satellite.ground-control/sql/queries/groups.sql (2)
2-3: LGTM!The changes to the
CreateGroupquery look good. The addition of theparent_group_idparameter allows for the creation of hierarchical group structures, which is a valuable enhancement. The query correctly inserts a new group with the provided parameters and returns the inserted group using theRETURNINGclause, which is a good practice.
6-8: Verify the delete operation.The
DeleteGroupquery looks good. It correctly deletes a group by its ID using theWHEREclause, which is a good practice. The query does not return any data, which is expected for a delete operation.To ensure that the query deletes the group and its associated data correctly, please run the following verification script:
ground-control/sql/queries/satellites.sql (1)
21-23: LGTM!The new
GetSatelliteByIDquery is a valuable addition that aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the satellite registration process. The query is correctly implemented and complements the existing functionality without altering the existing logic. TheLIMIT 1clause ensures that the response is concise and focused.This query can be useful in scenarios where a satellite needs to be retrieved by its unique identifier, such as during the registration process or for displaying satellite details.
ground-control/sql/queries/group_images.sql (3)
4-4: LGTM!Using
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHINGis a good practice to handle duplicate entries gracefully. It ensures idempotency of theINSERToperation.
6-8: LGTM!The
RemoveImageFromGroupcommand is correctly implemented and aligns with the objective of removing an image from a group.
16-31: LGTM!The
GetImagesForGroupAndSubgroupscommand is correctly implemented using a recursive CTE to build a hierarchy of groups and retrieve images for a group and its subgroups. This is a good approach to achieve the desired functionality.ground-control/internal/database/models.go (2)
13-17: LGTM!The addition of the
ParentGroupIDfield of typesql.NullInt32is a good way to represent hierarchical relationships between groups. The field name clearly conveys its purpose and usingsql.NullInt32type correctly handles cases where a group may not have a parent group.
60-63: LGTM!The new
SatelliteImagestruct withSatelliteIDandImageIDfields is a good way to associate satellite entities with their corresponding images. The field names clearly convey the purpose of the struct and usingint32type for the fields is appropriate.ground-control/sql/queries/images.sql (1)
13-15: LGTM! The renaming improves clarity.The
DeleteImagequery is implemented correctly and deletes a single record from theimagestable based on the providedid.The renaming from
DeleteImageListtoDeleteImageimproves clarity, as the query deletes a single record, not a list of records.internal/state/stateArtifact.go (1)
14-48: The implementation ofPullStateArtifactlooks good overall.The function follows a clear structure, handles errors appropriately, and uses structured logging. It effectively pulls the specified state artifact from the given registry.
ground-control/internal/database/satellite_groups.sql.go (5)
3-3: LGTM!The version update for the
sqlctool is a good practice to leverage the latest improvements and bug fixes in the code generation process.
15-15: LGTM!The addition of the
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHINGclause is a good practice to handle potential conflicts and maintain data integrity when inserting satellite-group associations.
28-55: LGTM!The implementation of the
GetGroupsBySatelliteIDfunction is well-structured and correctly retrieves the group names associated with a specific satellite ID. The SQL query, error handling, and rows processing logic are all implemented correctly.
57-60: LGTM!The
RemoveSatelliteFromGroupSQL query is correctly implemented to delete a satellite from a specified group based on the provided satellite and group IDs. It effectively facilitates the management of satellite-group relationships.
62-70: LGTM!The implementation of the
RemoveSatelliteFromGroupParamsstruct and theRemoveSatelliteFromGroupfunction is correct. The struct defines the required parameters, and the function correctly executes the SQL query using those parameters. The error handling is also implemented correctly.ground-control/internal/utils/helper.go (2)
13-51: LGTM!The
ParseArtifactURLfunction is well-implemented with the following highlights:
- Handles URLs without a scheme by adding "https://" as a default.
- Uses
url.Parseto parse the URL and handles errors appropriately.- Extracts the necessary components (registry, repository, tag, digest) from the parsed URL.
- Performs validations to ensure the presence of required components and logs appropriate error messages.
- Returns a populated
reg.Imagesstruct if all validations pass.The function follows good practices and provides a robust way to parse and validate artifact URLs.
54-74: LGTM!The
splitRepoTagDigesthelper function is well-implemented with the following highlights:
- Splits the path to extract the digest based on the presence of "@" symbol.
- If digest is not present, splits the path to extract the tag based on the presence of ":" symbol.
- Returns the split repository, tag, and digest components.
The function provides a clear and concise way to split the path into its constituent parts.
ground-control/internal/database/label_images.sql.go (1)
3-3: LGTM!The
sqlcversion update is a good practice to stay up-to-date with the latest enhancements and bug fixes in the code generation tool.ground-control/internal/database/images.sql.go (2)
50-50: LGTM!The renaming of the function and the corresponding SQL constant simplifies the naming convention and better reflects the function's purpose. The changes are consistent and the function logic is correct.
Also applies to: 55-57
80-81: LGTM!The renaming of the function and the corresponding SQL constant simplifies the naming convention and indicates a shift from a satellite-specific query to a more general image listing. The SQL query simplification enhances the functionality by allowing broader access to image data. The changes are consistent and the function logic is correct.
Also applies to: 84-113
ground-control/internal/server/routes.go (16)
15-15: LGTM!The endpoint renaming from
/registry/listto/repos/listaligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and reflects a shift in focus from registry management to repository management.
17-17: LGTM!The addition of the
/imagesendpoint for adding images aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing images.
18-18: LGTM!The addition of the
/images/listendpoint for listing images aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing images.
19-19: LGTM!The addition of the
/images/{imageID}endpoint for removing images by ID aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing images.
22-22: LGTM!The addition of the
/groupsendpoint for creating groups aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing groups.
23-23: LGTM!The addition of the
/groups/{groupID}endpoint for deleting groups by ID aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing groups.
24-24: LGTM!The endpoint renaming from
/group/listto/groups/listaligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and reflects a more organized and comprehensive approach to managing groups.
25-25: LGTM!The endpoint renaming from
/group/{group}to/groups/{groupID}aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and reflects a more organized and comprehensive approach to managing groups.
26-26: LGTM!The addition of the
/groups/imagesendpoint for assigning images to groups aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing images associated with groups.
27-27: LGTM!The addition of the
/groups/imagesendpoint for deleting images from groups aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing images associated with groups.
28-28: LGTM!The addition of the
/groups/{groupID}/imagesendpoint for listing images for a specific group aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces a new functionality for managing images associated with groups.
29-30: LGTM!The addition of the
/groups/satelliteendpoints for adding and removing satellites from groups aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces new functionalities for managing satellites associated with groups.
33-34: LGTM!The addition of the
/label/imageendpoints for assigning and deleting images from labels aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces new functionalities for managing images associated with labels.
37-38: LGTM!The addition of the
/satellites/registerand/satellites/ztrendpoints for registering satellites and handling Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) aligns with the PR objective of implementing the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process for satellites and introduces new functionalities for satellite registration.
40-42: LGTM!The addition of the
/satellites/list,/satellites/{satellite}(GET), and/satellites/{satellite}(DELETE) endpoints for listing satellites, retrieving satellites by ID, and deleting satellites by ID aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces new functionalities for managing satellites.
44-45: LGTM!The addition of the
/satellites/imageendpoints for assigning and removing images from satellites aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to satellite registration and introduces new functionalities for managing images associated with satellites.ground-control/internal/database/satellite_images.sql.go (3)
24-27: LGTM!The
AssignImageToSatellitefunction correctly implements the logic to assign an image to a satellite by inserting a record into thesatellite_imagestable. The use of theON CONFLICT DO NOTHINGclause is a good choice to handle potential duplicates gracefully.This function aligns with the PR objective of implementing the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process for satellites.
48-79: LGTM!The
GetImagesForSatellitefunction correctly implements the logic to retrieve all images associated with a given satellite ID. The join between theimagesandsatellite_imagestables ensures that only the relevant images are fetched.The error handling is appropriate, covering potential errors during query execution, row scanning, and closing the rows.
This function aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the functionality related to satellite registration within the Ground Control system.
91-94: LGTM!The
RemoveImageFromSatellitefunction correctly implements the logic to remove the association between a satellite and an image based on their respective IDs. The delete statement uses the appropriate condition to identify the record to be removed.This function aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the functionality related to satellite registration within the Ground Control system.
internal/store/http-fetch.go (2)
14-14: LGTM!The import statement for the
utilspackage is correctly formatted.
106-115: Excellent refactoring!The changes in this code segment significantly improve the authentication mechanism:
- The authentication logic is encapsulated in the
utils.Auth()function, making the code cleaner and more maintainable.- Error handling is enhanced by checking the error returned by
utils.Auth()and logging an error message if authentication fails.- The
authobject is directly used in the call tocrane.Digest, streamlining the authentication process.These modifications enhance the robustness, clarity, and security of the code by centralizing credential management.
ground-control/internal/database/satellites.sql.go (2)
54-57: LGTM!The SQL query is correctly implemented to retrieve a satellite record by its ID. It selects the required columns, uses a parameter placeholder for the ID value, and limits the result to 1 row.
59-70: LGTM!The
GetSatelliteByIDfunction is correctly implemented to execute thegetSatelliteByIDSQL query and return the result as aSatellitestruct. It takes the necessary parameters, executes the query usingQueryRowContext, and scans the result into the struct fields. The function returns theSatellitestruct and any error encountered during the execution.ground-control/internal/database/group_images.sql.go (4)
3-3: LGTM!Updating the SQL code generator to v1.27.0 is a good practice to ensure the latest features, bug fixes, and security patches are available. The minor version update is not expected to introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues.
16-16: LGTM!Adding the
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHINGclause to theassignImageToGroupSQL query improves the robustness of the query by gracefully handling potential conflicts (e.g., duplicate key) during the insertion. This change ensures that the operation is skipped without raising an error in case of a conflict.
81-128: LGTM!The addition of the
getImagesForGroupAndSubgroupsSQL query and the correspondingGetImagesForGroupAndSubgroupsGo function enhances the functionality by providing a more comprehensive retrieval of images based on the group hierarchy. The recursive Common Table Expression (CTE) allows for traversing the group hierarchy and retrieving images from the specified group and its child groups.The implementation of the Go function follows the standard pattern of executing the query, scanning the results, and returning the list of images. The error handling and resource management (e.g., closing the rows) are properly implemented.
130-143: LGTM!The addition of the
removeImageFromGroupSQL query and the correspondingRemoveImageFromGroupGo function enhances the functionality by allowing users to remove an image from a specific group. This change provides the capability to manage image associations more effectively.The implementation of the Go function follows the standard pattern of executing the query and returning any error that occurred. The
RemoveImageFromGroupParamsstruct provides a clear and structured way to pass the required parameters to the function.ground-control/internal/database/groups.sql.go (8)
3-3: LGTM!The sqlc version update is a minor change and does not affect the functionality.
15-17: LGTM!The
createGroupSQL query is correctly updated to include theparent_group_idfield, which is necessary to support the hierarchical group structure.
21-24: LGTM!The
CreateGroupParamsstruct is correctly updated to include theParentGroupIDfield of typesql.NullInt32, which is necessary to support the hierarchical group structure and handle nullable integer values in the database.
28-33: LGTM!The
CreateGroupfunction is correctly updated to include theParentGroupIDfield in the SQL query parameters and theGroupstruct, which is necessary to support the hierarchical group structure.Also applies to: 38-38
45-53: LGTM!The new
DeleteGroupfunction is correctly implemented to delete a group by its ID using thedeleteGroupSQL query. The function takes the group ID as a parameter, executes the SQL query usingExecContext, and performs error handling by returning the error from the SQL execution.
56-56: LGTM!The
GetGroupByID,GetGroupByName, and their corresponding SQL queries are correctly updated to include theparent_group_idfield in the SELECT statements and theGroupstruct, which is necessary to support the hierarchical group structure.Also applies to: 66-66, 74-74, 84-84
91-124: LGTM!The new
GetSubgroupsfunction is correctly implemented to retrieve all subgroups of a given parent group ID using thegetSubgroupsSQL query. The function takes the parent group ID as a parameter, executes the SQL query usingQueryContext, correctly handles the database rows, scans the results intoGroupstructs, and performs error handling for database query execution, row scanning, and closing the rows.
127-127: LGTM!The
listGroupsSQL query and theListGroupsfunction are correctly updated to include theparent_group_idfield in the SELECT statement and theGroupstruct, which is necessary to support the hierarchical group structure.Also applies to: 142-142
internal/replicate/replicate.go (1)
167-170: LGTM!The changes to the authentication process in the
CopyImagefunction look good. Replacing the previous logic with a call to the newutils.Auth()function simplifies the code and centralizes the authentication logic in theutilspackage. This improves maintainability and reduces the risk of errors related to environment variable management.The error handling for authentication is also streamlined by directly logging any errors returned by
utils.Auth(), which enhances the clarity and robustness of the code.Overall, the changes align with the provided list of alterations and maintain the core functionality of the image replication process.
ground-control/reg/satelliteState.go (4)
17-21: LGTM!The
GroupStatestruct is well-defined, with clear field names and appropriate serialization tags. The use of theomitemptytag for theImagesfield is a good practice to avoid serializing empty slices.
23-28: LGTM!The
SatelliteStatestruct is well-defined, with clear field names and appropriate serialization tags. The use of theomitemptytag for theImagesfield is a good practice to avoid serializing empty slices.
45-50: LGTM!The
Stateinterface is well-defined, with clear method signatures for marshaling, retrieving state information, and determining the state type. The interface provides a flexible and extensible way to handle different types of states.
52-82: LGTM!The implementation of the
Stateinterface methods forGroupStateandSatelliteStateis straightforward and adheres to the interface contract. The use ofjson.MarshalIndentprovides nicely formatted JSON output, and theGetName,GetRegistry, andisGroupStatemethods provide convenient access to the struct fields and state type.ground-control/internal/server/handlers.go (12)
220-230: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
232-252: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
254-279: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
335-344: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
346-364: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
366-385: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
480-500: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
560-563: LGTM!The changes to the function are implemented correctly and handle errors appropriately.
617-640: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
642-662: LGTM!The function is implemented correctly and handles errors appropriately.
675-688: LGTM!The changes to the function are implemented correctly and handle errors appropriately.
699-747: Consider adding logging statements.The function looks
Signed-off-by: bupd <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
ground-control/internal/database/models.go (3)
47-52: Consider renaming theProjectsfield for clarity.The addition of the
Projectstruct is a good way to introduce a new entity in the data model to represent projects. The field names are clear and follow Go naming conventions.However, the
Projectsfield name is plural, which might be confusing. Consider renaming it toNameorProjectNamefor clarity.type Project struct { ID int32 - Projects string + Name string CreatedAt time.Time UpdatedAt time.Time }
63-66: Consider adding timestamp fields for consistency and tracking.The addition of the
RobotProjectstruct is a good way to establish a relationship between robots and projects. The field names are clear and follow Go naming conventions.However, the struct does not have any timestamp fields like
CreatedAtandUpdatedAt. Consider adding them for consistency with other structs and to track the creation and modification times of the relationship.type RobotProject struct { RobotID int32 ProjectID int32 + CreatedAt time.Time + UpdatedAt time.Time }
81-84: Consider adding timestamp fields for consistency and tracking.The addition of the
SatelliteImagestruct is a good way to establish a relationship between satellites and images. The field names are clear and follow Go naming conventions.However, similar to the
RobotProjectstruct, consider addingCreatedAtandUpdatedAtfields for consistency with other structs and to track the creation and modification times of the relationship.type SatelliteImage struct { SatelliteID int32 ImageID int32 + CreatedAt time.Time + UpdatedAt time.Time }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
ground-control/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (4)
- ground-control/go.mod (1 hunks)
- ground-control/internal/database/models.go (3 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/010_robots.sql (1 hunks)
- ground-control/sql/schema/012_robot_projects.sql (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- ground-control/sql/schema/010_robots.sql
- ground-control/sql/schema/012_robot_projects.sql
Additional comments not posted (4)
ground-control/go.mod (2)
9-9: LGTM!The addition of the direct dependency on
github.com/opencontainers/image-specwith a specific version constraint is a good practice. It ensures consistent builds and aligns with the removal of thego-containerregistrydependency, suggesting a strategic shift in the module's image-related functionality.
10-10: Verify the usage of the neworas-godependency in the codebase.The addition of the direct dependency on
oras.land/oras-go/v2with a specific version constraint is a good practice. It suggests that the module now interacts with container registries using the ORAS protocol, which aligns with the PR objectives related to implementing the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process for satellites.To ensure that the new dependency is being used effectively, please run the following script to search for references to the
oras-gopackage in the codebase:Verification successful
To gain a more comprehensive understanding of how the
oras-gopackage is being used, let's examine the actual usage of the imported packages within thesatelliteState.gofile.
It seems our previous search was too narrow and didn't capture the usage of the
oras-gopackage. Let's broaden our search to find any references toorasor its subpackages within thesatelliteState.gofile.
The
oras-godependency is being used effectively and extensively in the codebase.The verification process has confirmed that the
oras-gopackage and its subpackages are being utilized properly in theground-control/reg/satelliteState.gofile. The implementation demonstrates appropriate usage of ORAS features, including:
- File store creation and management
- Manifest packing and handling
- Remote repository interactions
- Authentication and credential management
- Artifact copying (pushing) to the registry
This usage aligns well with the PR objectives related to implementing the Zero Touch Registration (ZTR) process for satellites. The code shows a thoughtful implementation that supports both group and individual satellite states, indicating a flexible and well-designed solution.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `oras-go` package in the codebase. # Test: Search for import statements and references to the `oras-go` package. # Expect: At least one import statement and multiple references to the package. rg --type go -A 5 $'oras-go'Length of output: 740
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the content of the satelliteState.go file, focusing on the usage of oras-go package. # Test: Search for functions or methods that use the oras-go package. # Expect: To find implementations using the imported oras-go packages. rg --type go -A 20 'func.*oras' ground-control/reg/satelliteState.goLength of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any usage of oras-go package in satelliteState.go # Test: Look for any references to oras or its subpackages # Expect: To find code snippets using the oras-go package rg --type go -A 10 -e 'oras\.' -e 'file\.' -e 'remote\.' -e 'auth\.' -e 'retry\.' ground-control/reg/satelliteState.goLength of output: 2790
ground-control/internal/database/models.go (2)
13-17: LGTM!The addition of the
ParentGroupIDfield usingsql.NullInt32is a suitable way to represent optional hierarchical relationships between groups. This change enhances the data model's capability to represent nested group structures, which aligns with the PR objectives.
54-61: Securely handle theSecretfield.The addition of the
Robotstruct is a good way to introduce a new entity in the data model to represent robots. The field names are clear, follow Go naming conventions, and the use ofsql.NullInt32for theSatelliteIDfield suggests an optional association between robots and satellites.However, the
Secretfield might contain sensitive information. Please ensure that it is properly encrypted and handled securely to prevent any potential leaks or unauthorized access.
|
closing this PR in favor of #54 |
Fixes: #41 & #36
Fix: #36
Note: This PR should be merged after merging #40, as it is built on top of the changes introduced in that PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
robotstable to store robot information and arobot_projectstable to manage relationships between robots and projects.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation