CI: Corrects the argument name in workflows #51
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the argument names in the build commands for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/build.yaml (2 hunks)
- ci/utils.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/build.yaml (2)
96-96: LGTM! Consistent argument name change.The change from
--nameto--componentfor the ground-control build is consistent with the previous change for the satellite build. This ensures uniformity across different components in the workflow.
61-61: Summary: Argument name changes successfully address the CI issue.The changes in this file consistently update the argument name from
--nameto--componentfor both the satellite and ground-control builds. These modifications directly address the objectives of the PR and should resolve the CI failure mentioned in issue #50.The new argument name
--componentis more appropriate for specifying the build target and maintains consistency across different parts of the workflow. These changes improve the clarity and correctness of the build process without introducing any apparent side effects.Also applies to: 96-96
ci/utils.go (1)
62-63: Approve change, update comment, and verify usage.The parameter name change from
nametocomponentimproves clarity and aligns with the PR objectives. Good job on this improvement!However, there are a couple of follow-up actions:
- Please update the comment above the function to reflect the new parameter name:
- // Would build the project with the source provided. The name should be the name of the project. + // Would build the project with the source provided. The component should be the name of the project component.
- Ensure all calls to this function in the codebase are updated to use the new parameter name.
To verify the function usage across the codebase, run the following script:
Verification successful
All build function calls are correctly updated. Verification successful.
- Verified that the
buildfunction is called only with the newcomponentparameter inci/main.go.- No remaining calls use the old
nameparameter.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of the build function call # Search for the old function call pattern echo "Searching for old function calls (should be empty):" rg --type go 'build\s*\([^)]*name\s*:' -g '!ci/utils.go' # Search for the new function call pattern echo "Searching for new function calls:" rg --type go 'build\s*\([^)]*component\s*:' -g '!ci/utils.go'Length of output: 312
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of the build function call regardless of parameter names echo "Searching for all build function calls:" rg --type go '\bbuild\s*\(' -g '!ci/utils.go'Length of output: 182
FIXES #50
Summary by CodeRabbit