Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add deltaSrc to replication protocol #2242

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add deltaSrc to replication protocol #2242

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

torcolvin
Copy link

First commit fixes sublists being eaten, caught by asciidoctor and by eye.

  • Put a visual separation between properties and body definition. Fixes a case where missing + was present.

Substantive part of the changes was adding deltaSrc property to the definition.

@cbl-bot
Copy link

cbl-bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Code Coverage Results:

Type Percentage
branches 66.15
functions 78.43
instantiations 70.43
lines 77.57
regions 73.37

@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ _(optional)_ +
`versioning`: `rev-trees` (default) or `version-vectors` -- see the <<revIDs>> section. +
_other properties_: Named parameters for the filter function
_(optional)_ +
`sendReplacementRevs`: Boolean indicating whether the passive peer (pusher) should send replacement revs rather than NoRev when the body of a requested rev is unavailable and a newer revision is available. _(optional)_+
`sendReplacementRevs`: Boolean indicating whether the passive peer (pusher) should send replacement revs rather than NoRev when the body of a requested rev is unavailable and a newer revision is available. _(optional)_ +
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Random space added?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not random, it is required to put this text on a newline. https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/blocks/hard-line-breaks/

Without this, the next line would be on the same line.

while processing the `rev` message, in which case it MUST NOT send the
`rev`'s response until it's received responses to the `getattach`
``rev``'s response until it's received responses to the `getAttachment`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why the need for double backtick?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, this whole section is indented.

@torcolvin
Copy link
Author

I used asciidoctor replication.adoc to test display locally which renders a bit different than github but allows for visual assessment where I found formatting errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants