Extract nodoc into mixin and refactor #2368
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To support #2266, extract the nodoc handling into what was CommentProcessable (now DocumentationComment). This also moves all of the directly documentation comment related handling into DocumentationComment, while punting some things that didn't belong back to ModelElement (having the mixin declare some things abstractly if need be).
I think the overall effect is positive, though it has a drawback or two (shadowed "documentationComment" variables, among other things). I can rename those if it will make the PR more clear.
I haven't renamed the file for ease of review; will do that if approved.