Skip to content

docs: Format stragglers via prettier #13247

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 18, 2025
Merged

docs: Format stragglers via prettier #13247

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 18, 2025

Conversation

asikowitz
Copy link
Collaborator

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions github-actions bot added docs Issues and Improvements to docs product PR or Issue related to the DataHub UI/UX labels Apr 17, 2025
@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@asikowitz asikowitz merged commit e9a7d35 into master Apr 18, 2025
85 checks passed
@asikowitz asikowitz deleted the more-md-format branch April 18, 2025 22:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hsheth2 hsheth2 hsheth2 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs Issues and Improvements to docs pending-submitter-merge product PR or Issue related to the DataHub UI/UX
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@asikowitz @hsheth2