Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: improve publish and prod protection #12

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

Conversation

simon-something
Copy link
Member

@simon-something simon-something commented Jan 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow for publishing
    • Added production environment configuration
    • Upgraded release creation process
    • Enabled automatic release notes generation

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/publish.yml. The changes primarily focus on updating the workflow configuration for publishing processes. Both the crates-io and github-release jobs now explicitly specify a production environment through the environment: Prod declaration. The crates-io job now includes a checkout step using actions/checkout@v4, which was previously absent. In the github-release job, the release creation action has been switched from actions/create-release@latest to softprops/action-gh-release@v2. The release configuration has been simplified, with the addition of generate_release_notes: true and the removal of previous release name and body parameters.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94c53fa and c0ffee3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/publish.yml

[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12

(indentation)


[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 8

(indentation)


[warning] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12

(indentation)


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Current test coverage

Filename                      Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cli.rs                              7                 7     0.00%           7                 7     0.00%           7                 7     0.00%           0                 0         -
gen.rs                             67                49    26.87%          14                 4    71.43%         211               115    45.50%           0                 0         -
main.rs                             4                 4     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%           6                 6     0.00%           0                 0         -
types.rs                           42                42     0.00%          13                13     0.00%          75                75     0.00%           0                 0         -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                             120               102    15.00%          35                25    28.57%         299               203    32.11%           0                 0         -

@simon-something
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (2)

20-22: LGTM! Consider adding cargo login verification.

Good addition of the checkout step. The job correctly uses CRATES_API_TOKEN for authentication.

Consider adding a verification step to ensure the token works:

 - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+- name: Verify crates.io token
+ run: cargo login ${CRATES_API_TOKEN}
 - run: cargo publish --token ${CRATES_API_TOKEN}
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12

(indentation)


34-39: LGTM! Good choice of GitHub release action.

The switch to softprops/action-gh-release and enabling automatic release notes generation are good improvements. This action is well-maintained and provides better features.

Consider adding draft releases for additional review:

 with:
   tag_name: ${{ github.ref }}
   generate_release_notes: true
+  draft: true
🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (2)

31-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use a specific version for the checkout action.

Using @master for actions can lead to unexpected breaking changes. It's recommended to use a specific version.

 - name: Checkout code
-  uses: actions/checkout@master
+  uses: actions/checkout@v4
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

              uses: actions/checkout@v4
            - name: Create Release

18-18: 💡 Codebase verification

Production environment Prod does not exist

The workflow references a Prod environment that hasn't been created in the repository settings. This bypasses the intended security controls since deployments will proceed without any protection rules. Please:

  • Create the Prod environment in repository settings
  • Configure appropriate protection rules:
    • Required reviewers
    • Wait timer
    • Deployment branch restrictions
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Production environment protection rules.

Adding environment protection is a good security practice. However, we need to ensure the Prod environment is properly configured with protection rules.

Let's verify the environment configuration:

Also applies to: 28-28

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if Prod environment exists and has protection rules

# Get environment protection rules
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  "/repos/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/environments/Prod" | \
  jq '{
    protection_rules: .protection_rules,
    deployment_branch_policy: .deployment_branch_policy,
    reviewers: .reviewers
  }'

Length of output: 325

@simon-something simon-something merged commit bb05fd5 into dev Jan 30, 2025
7 checks passed
@simon-something simon-something deleted the chore/publish-ci branch January 30, 2025 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants