Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support PowerScale LDAP Provider Datasource #113

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

taohe1012
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Support PowerScale LDAP Provider Datasource.

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #

ISSUE TYPE

  • Feature Pull Request
RESOURCE OR DATASOURCE NAME

LDAP Provider Datasource

OUTPUT

AT and UT for LDAP Provider are passed:
image

image

image

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 80% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have maintained backward compatibility

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Unit tests
  • Acceptance tests

@taohe1012
Copy link
Collaborator Author

run e2e test

1 similar comment
@taohe1012
Copy link
Collaborator Author

run e2e test

@taohe1012 taohe1012 force-pushed the feature-ldap-datasource branch from 6c13336 to b6866f5 Compare January 16, 2024 06:08
@taohe1012
Copy link
Collaborator Author

run e2e test

@taohe1012 taohe1012 merged commit 324494f into main Jan 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@taohe1012 taohe1012 deleted the feature-ldap-datasource branch January 17, 2024 03:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants